Bibliography
Belnap, N.D., 1973. ‘Restricted Quantification and Conditional Assertion,’Truth, Syntax and Modality (ed. by H. Leblanc). North Holland.
Frege, G., 1884.The Foundations of Arithmetic, translated by J. L. Austin. Northwestern University Press, 1968.
Frege, G., 1918–19. ‘The Thought: A logical inquiry’, (translated by A. M. and M. Quinton),Essays on Frege, 1968, ed. by E.D. Klemke.
Grover, D.L., 1972. ‘Propositional Quantifiers,’Journal of Philosophycal Logic, I, 111.
Grover, D. L., 1977. ‘Inheritors and Paradox,’Journal of Philosophy, LXXIV, 590–604.
Grover, D.L., 1979. ‘Prosentences and Propositional Quantification: A response to Zimmerman,’Philosophical Studies 35.
Grover, D. L., Camp, J.L., and Belnap, N.D. ‘A prosentential theory of truth,’Philosophical Studies 27, pp. 73–124.
Kripke, S. A., 1975. ‘Outline of a theory of truth,’Journal of Philosophy, LXXII, 690–716.
Lewis, D., 1972. ‘General Semantics,’Semantics of Natural Language (eds. Davidson and Harman). Reidel.
Martin, R. L., and Woodruff, P. W. ‘On representing ‘true-in-L.’Philosophia, V, 213–217.
Prior, A.N., 1968. ‘Correspondence theory of truth,’ in Edwards, P. (editor in chief),The Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Macmillan.
Quine, W.V., 1970.Philosophy of Logic. Prentice Hall.
Ramsey, F.P., 1927. ‘Facts and Propositions,’Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supp. Vol. 7.
Strawson, P.F., 1949. ‘Truth,’Analysis. IX, 83–97.
Strawson, P.F., 1950. ‘Truth,’Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supp. Vol. 24.
Strawson, P.F., 1974. ‘Positions of Quantifiers,’Semantics and Philosophy (ed. Munitz and Unger). New York University Press.
Tarski, A., 1936. ‘The concept of truth in formalized languages,’ translated inLogic, Semantics Metamathematics, pp. 152–278. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1956.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
I have benefited from many discussions with Herbert Heidelberger and other members of the University of Massachusetts and Smith philosophy department, during the preparation of this paper. I thank Anil Gupta for drawing attention to some confusions in an earlier draft of §3.1. Also helpful have been comments made on an earlier draft by Kent Wilson and other colleagues at Chicago Circle. The research was supported in part by an NEH summer grant.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grover, D.L. Truth. Philosophia 10, 225–252 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02380767
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02380767