Skip to main content
Log in

A Defence Of Connectionism Against The "Syntactic'' Argument

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In "Representations without Rules, Connectionism and the Syntactic Argument'', Kenneth Aizawa argues against the view that connectionist nets can be understood as processing representations without the use of representation-level rules, and he provides a positive characterization of how to interpret connectionist nets as following representation-level rules. He takes Terry Horgan and John Tienson to be the targets of his critique. The present paper marshals functional and methodological considerations, gleaned from the practice of cognitive modelling, to argue against Aizawa's characterization of how connectionist nets may be understood as making use of representation-level rules.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Aizawa, K.: 1994, 'Representations without Rules, Connectionism and the Syntactic Argument', Synthese 101, 465–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aizawa, K.: 0000, 'Connectionist Rules: A Rejoinder to Horgan and Tienson's Connectionism and the Philosophy of Psychology', Acta Analytica 22, 59–85.

  • Chomsky, N.: 1986, Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use, Praeger Publishers, CN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A.:1990, 'Connectionism, Competence, and Explanation', British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 41, 195–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A.: 1993, Associative Engines: Connectionism, Concepts, and Representational Change, MIT Press, A Bradford Book, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, M.: 1989, 'Connectionism, Modularity, and Tacit Knowledge', British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 40, 541–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, M.: 1991, 'Concepts, Connectionism, and the Language of Thought', in W. Ramsey, S. Stich, and D. Rumelhart (eds), Philosophy and Connectionist Theory, Lawrence Earlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 229–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, M.: 1995a, 'Tacit Knowledge and Subdoxastic States', in C. Macdonald and G. Macdonald (eds), Philosophy of Psychology: Debates on Psychological Explanation, Volume One, Blackwell, Oxford UK and Cambridge USA, pp. 309–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, M.: 1995b, 'Consciousness and the Varieties of Aboutness', in C. Macdonald and G. Macdonald (eds), Philosophy of Psychology: Debates on Psychological Explanation, Volume One, Blackwell, Oxford, UK and Cambridge, USA, pp. 356–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, P.: 1984, 'Liquids', in J. Hobbs (ed.), Formal Theories of the Commonsense World, Ablex, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horgan, T. and J. Tienson: 1988, 'Settling into a New Paradigm', Connectionism and the Philosophy of Mind: Proceedings of the 1987 Spindel Conference, Southern Journal of Philosophy 26, 97–113, supplement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horgan, T. and J. Tienson: 1989, 'Representations Without Rules', Philosophical Topics 17, 147–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horgan, T. and J. Tienson: 1990, 'Soft Laws', Midwest Studies in Philosophy: The Philosophy of the Human Sciences 15, 256–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horgan, T. and J. Tienson: 1992, 'Cognitive systems as Dynamical Systems', Topoi 11, 27–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horgan, T. and J. Tienson: 1994, 'Representations Don't Need Rules: Reply to James Garson', Mind and Language 9, 38–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horgan, T. and J. Tienson: 1996, Connectionism and the Philosophy of Psychology, MIT Press, A Bradford Book, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horgan, T. and J. Tienson: 1999a, 'Short Précis of Connectionism and the Philosophy of Psychology', Acta Analytica 22, 9–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horgan, T. and J. Tienson: 1999b, 'Authors' Replies', Acta Analytica 22, 275–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marr, D.: 1982, Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information, W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marr, D. and T. Poggio: 1976, 'Cooperative Computation of Stereo Disparity', Science 194, 283–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacocke, C.: 1986, 'Explanation in Computational Psychology: Language, Perception and Level 1.5', Mind and Language 1, 101–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffer, S.: 1991, 'Does Mentalese have a Compositional Semantics?', in Barry Loewer and Georges Rey (eds), Meaning in Mind: Fodor and his Critics, Blackwell, Oxford UK and Cambridge USA, pp. 181–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. R.: 1995, 'Consciousness, Explanatory Inversion and Cognitive Science', in C. Macdonald and G. Macdonald (eds), Philosophy of Psychology: Debates on Psychological Explanation, Volume One, Blackwell, Oxford, UK and Cambridge, USA, pp. 331–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sejnowski, T. and C. Rosenberg: 1986, 'Parallel Networks that Learn to Pronounce English Text', Complex Systems 1, 145–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smolensky, P.: 1995, 'Reply: Constituent Structure and Explanation in an Integrated Connectionist/Symbolic Cognitive Architecture', in C. Macdonald and G. Macdonald (eds), Connectionism: Debates on Psychological Explanation, Blackwell Publishers, Cambridge USA and Oxford UK, pp. 223–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Gelder, T.: 1991, 'What is the "P" in "PDP"? A Survey of the Concept of Distribution', in W. Ramsey, S. P. Stich, and D. E. Rumelhart (eds), Philosophy and Connectionist Theory, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ and London, pp. 33–59.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guarini, M. A Defence Of Connectionism Against The "Syntactic'' Argument. Synthese 128, 287–317 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011905917986

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011905917986

Keywords

Navigation