Skip to main content
Log in

On Legal Order: Some Criticism of the Received View

  • Published:
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The author discusses a number of topics related to the concept of ‘legal order’ and the structure of legal orders. In particular, the following theses are challenged: (1) legal orders are sets of rules; (2) the criterion of membership to such sets is validity; (3) legal orders are dynamic sets; (4) legal orders are provided with a hierarchical configuration; (5) legal orders are coherent and consistent sets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Alchourrón, C.E. and Bulygin, E., Normative Systems. Wien: Springer Verlag, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alchourrón, C.E. and Bulygin, E., Sobre el concepto de orden jurídico, in C.E. Alchourrón, E. Bulygin, Análisis lógico y Derecho. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Constitucionales, 1991, pp. 393 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexy, R., Teoría de los derechos fundamentales. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Constitucionales, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobbio, N., Des critères pour résoudre les antinomies, Dialectica 18 (1964), pp. 237 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulygin, E., Legal Dogmatics and the Systematization of Law, in Rechtstheorie, Beiheft 10, Berlin Duncker & Humblot, 1986., pp. 193 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulygin, E., Norme, validità, sistemi normativi. Torino: Giappichelli, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caracciolo, R., El sistema jurídico. Problemas Actuales. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Constitucionales, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, R., A Matter of Principle. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guastini, R., Gerarchie normative, Materiali per una storia della cultura giuridica 27(2) (1997), pp. 463 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guastini, R., Interpretive Statements, in E. Garzón Valdés et al. (eds), Normative Systems in Legal and Moral Theory. Festschrift for Carlos E. Alchourrón and Eugenio Bulygin. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1997, pp. 279 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guastini, R., Sur la validité de la constitution du point de vue du positivisme juridique, in M. Troper and L. Jaume (eds), 1789 et l'invention de la constitution. Bruxelles-Paris: Bruylant, 1994, pp. 216 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guastini, R., Teoria e dogmatica delle fonti. Milano: Giuffré, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelsen, H., Théorie pure du droit. Paris: Dalloz, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCormick, N., Coherence in Legal Justification, in A. Peczenick et al. (ed)., Theory of Legal Science. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1984, pp. 231 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merkl, A., Prolegomeni ad una teoria della costruzione a gradi del diritto, in A. Merkl, Il duplice volto del diritto. Milano: Giuffré, 1987, 37 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raz, J., The Concept of a Legal System. Oxford: Clarendon, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarello, G., Cultura giuridica e politica del diritto. Bologna: Il Mulino, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, G. H. von, Norm and Action. A Logical Enquiry. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zagrebelsky, G., Il diritto mite. Legge, diritti, giustizia. Torino: Einaudi, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guastini, R. On Legal Order: Some Criticism of the Received View. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 3, 263–272 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009995908573

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009995908573

Navigation