Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-06T10:51:24.037Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

ONCE MORE BEYOND CONSENSUS: THE “TRANSNATIONAL TURN” AND AMERICAN LIBERAL NATIONALISM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 September 2011

CARL J. GUARNERI*
Affiliation:
Department of History, Saint Mary's College of California E-mail: cguarner@stmarys-ca.edu

Extract

“It has been our fate as a nation not to have ideologies,” Richard Hofstadter famously wrote, “but to be one.” Defining that “American ideology” or “American creed” obsessed scholars of the consensus era, who celebrated (and occasionally lamented) Americans’ allegiance to a limited liberal vocabulary of rights, freedoms, and markets. The cultural transformations begun in the 1960s seemed to question the very idea of a unitary culture or creed, but some historians responded by exploring alternative ideological founding myths to the liberal consensus. Over the ensuing decades scholars mounted formidable efforts to support republicanism or millennial Christianity as challengers, but liberalism proved a resilient foe. And it seemed to have contemporary history on its side: during the Reagan revolution of the century's final decades the classic liberal combination of scaled-down government and free markets carried the day as Americans’ ideal if not their reality. The Lockean liberal tradition that Louis Hartz described a half-century earlier still appeared the only game in town, although scholars continued to argue over its terms, history, and boundaries.

Type
Review Essays
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Hofstadter, R., Anti-intellectualism in American Life (New York, 1963), 43Google Scholar.

2 Hartz, L., The Liberal Tradition in America (New York, 1955)Google Scholar.

3 Bercovitch, S., The Rites of Dissent: Transformations in the Symbolic Construction of America (New York, 1993)Google Scholar.

4 See, as representative titles, Greene, J. P. and Morgan, P. D., eds., Atlantic History: A Critical Appraisal (Oxford, 2009)Google Scholar; Hoerder, D., Cultures in Contact: World Migrations in the Second Millennium (Durham, NC, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Anderson, B. S., Joyous Greetings: The First International Women's Movement (New York, 2000)Google Scholar; Rodgers, D. T., Atlantic Crossings: Social Politics in a Progressive Age (Cambridge, MA, 1998)Google Scholar.

5 Messer-Kruse, T., The Yankee International: Marxism and the American Reform Tradition, 1848–1876 (Chapel Hill, NC, 1998)Google Scholar.

6 Howe, D. W., The Political Culture of the American Whigs (Chicago, 1979)Google Scholar.

7 Schlesinger, A. M. Jr, The Age of Jackson (Boston, 1945)Google Scholar; Wilentz, S., The Rise of American Democracy: Jefferson to Lincoln (New York, 2005)Google Scholar.

8 Quoted in Howe, D. W., What Hath God Wrought: The Transformation of America, 1815–1848 (New York, 2007), 792Google Scholar.

9 Thoreau, H. D., “Life Without Principle”, Atlantic Monthly 12 (Sept. 1863), 490Google Scholar.

10 Quoted in Thistlethwaite, F., The Anglo-American Connection in the Early Nineteenth Century (Philadelphia, 1959), 109CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 Potter, D. M., “Civil War”, in Woodward, C. V., ed., The Comparative Approach to American History (New York, 1968), 135–45Google Scholar; Bender, T., A Nation among Nations: America's Place in World History (New York, 2006), 116–81Google Scholar; Degler, C. N., “One among Many: The United States and National Unification”, in Boritt, G. S., ed., Lincoln, the War President (New York, 1992), 89119Google Scholar.

12 Rodgers, D. T., Contested Truths: Keywords in American Politics since Independence (New York, 1987)Google Scholar.