Skip to main content
Log in

Even-NPIs in YES/NO Questions

  • Published:
Natural Language Semantics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It has been a long-standing puzzle that Negative Polarity Items appear to split into two subvarieties when their effect on the interpretation of questions is taken into account: while questions with any and ever can be used as unbiased requests of information, questions with so-called `minimizers', i.e. idioms like lift a finger and the faintest idea, are always biased towards a negative answer (cf. Ladusaw 1979). Focusing on yes/no questions, this paper presents a solution to this puzzle. Specifically it is shown that in virtue of containing even (cf. Heim 1984), minimizers, unlike any, trigger a presupposition, which reduces the set of the possible answers to a question to the singleton containing the negative answer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Barker, L. and E. Herburger: 2000, 'Even Even can be an NPI: Facts from Spanish', in Georgetown University Working Papers in Theoretical Linguistics 1, pp. 79–92. Georgetown University, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, M.: 1977, 'A Response to Karttunen', Linguistics and Philosophy 1, 279–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borkin, A.: 1971, 'Polarity Items in Questions', in L. Dobrin et al. (eds.), Papers from the Seventh Regional Meeting, pp. 53–62. Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerzoni, E.: 2003, Why ‘Even’ Ask? On the Pragmatics of Ouestions and the Semantics of Answers. PhD dissertation, MIT.

  • Han, C.-H: 1998, 'Deriving the Interpretation of Rhetorical Questions', in E. Curtis, J. Lyle, and G. Webster (eds.), Proceedings of WCCFL 16, pp. 237–253. CSLI Publications, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, C.-H. and L. Siegel: 1996, 'syntactic and Semantic Conditions on NPI Licensing in Questions', in J. Camacho, L. Choueiri, and M. Watanabe (eds.), Proceedings of WCCFL 15, pp. 177–191. CSLI Publications, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, I.: 1984. 'A Note on Negative Polarity and DE-ness', in C. Jones and P. Sells (eds.), Proceedings of NELS 14, pp. 98–107. GLSA, Amherst, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higginbotham, J.: 1993, 'Interrogatives', in K. Hale and S. Keyser (eds.), The View from Building 20, pp. 195–227. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, L.: 1969, 'A Presuppositional Analysis of Only and Even', in R. Binnick, A. Davison, G. Green, and J. Morgan (eds.), Papers from the Fifth Regional Meeting, pp. 98–107. Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, L.: 1989, A Natural History of Negation. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karttunen, L.: 1977, 'syntax and Semantics of Questions', Linguistics and Philosophy 1(3), 3–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karttunen, L. and S. Peters: 1979, 'Conventional Implicature', in C.-K. Oh and D. Dinneen (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 11: Presuppositions, pp. 1–56. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krifka, M.: 2001, 'For a Structured Account of Questions and Answers' (revised version), in C. Fery and W. Sternefeld (eds.), Audiatur Vox Sapientia A Festschrift for Arnim von Stechow, pp. 287–319. Akademie Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladusaw, W.: 1979, Polarity Sensitivity as Inherent Scope Relations, PhD dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladusaw, W.: 2002, 'The Biasing Effect of Polarity Items in Questions', paper presented at CLS 38. To appear in Papers from the Thirty-Eighth Regional Meeting. Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahiri, U.: 1998, 'Focus and Negative Polarity in Hindi', Natural Language Semantics 6(1), 57–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y.-S and L. Horn: 1994, 'Any as Indefinite Plus Even', ms., Yale University.

  • Progovac, L.: 1993, 'Negative Polarity and Grammatical Representation', Linguistics and Philosophy 10, 49–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rooth, M.: 1985, Association with Focus, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rooth, M.: 1996, 'Focus', in S. Lappin (ed.) 'The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory, pp. 271–291. Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rullmann, H.: 1997, 'Even, Polarity and Scope', in M. Gibson, G. Wiebe, and G. Libben (eds), Papers in Experimental and Theoretical Linguistics 4, 40–64.

  • Schwarz, B.: 2000, 'Notes on Even', ms, University of Stuttgart.

  • Stalnaker, R.C.: 1978, 'Assertion', in P. Cole (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 9: Pragmatics, pp. 315–332. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, K.: 1996, 'The Scope of Even', Natural Language Semantics 4(3), 193–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwarts, F.: 1993, 'Three Types of Polarity', manuscript, University of Groningen. To appear in F. Hamm and E. Hinrichs (eds.), Semantics.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guerzoni, E. Even-NPIs in YES/NO Questions. Natural Language Semantics 12, 319–343 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-004-8739-0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-004-8739-0

Keywords

Navigation