In a previous work, we have shown that the null result of the Michelson–Morley experiment in vacuum is deeply connected with the notion of time. The same is true for the postulate of constancy of the two-way speed of light in vacuum in all frames independently of the state of motion of the emitting body. The argumentation formerly given is very general and has to be true not only within Special Relativity and its “equivalence” of all inertial frames, but as well as in Lorentz-Poincaré scenario of a preferred reference frame. This paper is the second of a trilogy intending to revisit the foundations of Special Relativity, and addresses the question of the constancy of the one-way speed of light and of the differences and similarities between both scenarios. Although they manifestly differ in philosophy, it is debated why and how the assumption of a “special system of reference experimentally inaccessible” is indeed compatible with Einstein’s Special Relativity, as beautifully outlined and discussed by Bell [Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988)]. This rather trivial statement is still astonishing nowadays to a big majority of scientists. The purpose of this work is to bring such assertion into perspective, widening the somewhat narrow view of Special Relativity often presented in textbooks and scientific papers.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Guerra V., de Abreu R., (2005). “The conceptualization of time and the constancy of the speed of light”. Eur. J. Phys. 26, S117
Bell J.S., (1988). Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Selleri F., (1996). “Noninvariant one-way velocity of light”. Found. Phys. 26, 641
Selleri F., (2005). “The inertial transformations and the relativity principle”. Found. Phys. Lett. 18, 325
Mansouri R., Sexl R.U., (1977). “A test theory of special relativity: I. Simultaneity and clock synchronization”. Gen. Relat. Gravit. 8, 497
M. Consoli and E. Costanzo, “The motion of the solar system and the Michelson–Morley experiment,” http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0311576 (2003).
Consoli M., Costanzo E., (2004). “From classical to modern ether-drift experiments: the narrow window for a preferred frame”. Phys. Lett. A 333, 355
R. T. Cahill and K. Kitto, “Re-analysis of Michelson–Morley experiments reveals agreement with COBE cosmic background radiation preferred frame so impacting on interpretation of general relativity,” http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0205070 (2002).
Cahill R.T., Kitto K., (2003). “Michelson-Morley experiments revisited and the cosmic background radiation preferred frame”. Apeiron 10, 104
Cahill R.T., (2004). “Absolute motion and gravitational effects”. Apeiron 11, 53
Miller D.C., (1933). “The ether-drift experiment and the determination of the absolute motion of the Earth”. Rev. Mod. Phys. 5, 203
V. Guerra and R. de Abreu, “Comment on ‘from classical to modern ether-drift experiments: the narrow window for a preferred frame’ [Phys. Lett. A 333, 355 (2004)],” Phys. Lett. A (2006) in press, doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2006.09.033
de Abreu R., Guerra V., (2005). Relativity—Einstein’s Lost Frame, 1st edn. Extramuros, Lisboa
A. Einstein, in Einstein’s Miraculous Year, J. Stachel, ed. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1998) [(the article first appeared in Ann. Phys. 17, 123–160 (1905)].
Feynman R.P., Leighton R.B., Sands M., (1979). The Feynman Lectures on Physics, 13th edn. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA
Serway R.A., Beichner R.J., (2000). Physics For Scientists and Engineers with Modern Physics, 5th edn. Saunders College Publishing, London
Leubner C., Aufinger K., Krumm P., (1992). “Elementary relativity with ‘everyday’ clock synchronization”. Eur. J. Phys. 13, 170
M. C. Duffy, Physical Interpretations of Relativity Theory IX (Proceedings), vol.1 (PD Publications, Liverpool, 2004), pp. 158–202.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guerra, V., de Abreu, R. On the Consistency between the Assumption of a Special System of Reference and Special Relativity. Found Phys 36, 1826–1845 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-006-9085-5
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-006-9085-5