Skip to main content
Log in

Talking identity: The production of “self” in interaction

  • Published:
Human Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bigus, O, Hadden, S. C., & Glaser, B. The study of basic social processes. In R. Smith & P. Manning (Eds.),The handbook of social science methods: Qualitative methods. New york: Irving, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, K.A grammar of motives. Berkeley, Calif.: Univ. of California Press, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicourel, A.Method and measurement in sociology. New York: Free Press, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicourel, A.The social organization of juvenile justice. New York: Wiley, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicourel, A.Cognitive sociology. New York: Free Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, C. H.Human nature and the social order. New York: C. Scribner, 1922.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H.Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H., & Sacks, H. On formal structures of practical actions. In J. C. McKinney & E. Tiryakian (Eds.),Theoretical sociology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis.Social Problems, 1965,12, 436–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B., & Strauss, A.The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E.The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E.Behavior in public places. New York: Free Press, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E.Interaction ritual. New York: Doubleday, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E.Strategic interaction. Philadelphia: Univ. of Pennsylvania Press, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurwitsch, A.Field of consciousness. Pittsburgh: Duquesne Univ. Press, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadden, S. C. & Lester, M. Ethnomethodology and grounded theory methodology: An integration of topic and method.Urban Life, forthcoming.

  • Kadushin, C. The professional self concept of music students.American Journal of Sociology, 1969,75 389–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, M., & McPartland, T. S. An empirical investigation of self attitudes.American Sociological Review 1954,19 68–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, M. Self attitudes by age, sex, and professional training.Sociological Quarterly 1960,1 39–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leiter, K. Telling it like it is: A study of teachers' accounts. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyman, S., & Scott, M. Territoriality: A neglected sociological dimension.Social Problems 1969,15 236–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyman, S., & Scott, M. Accounts.American Sociological Review 1968,33 46–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G. H.Philosophy of the present. LaSalle, Ill.: Open Court, 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G. H.Mind, self and society. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G. H.The philosophy of the act. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. W. Situated actions and vocabularies of motives.American Sociological Review 1940,5 904–913.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulford, H., & Salisbury, W. Self conceptions in a general public. In J. Manis & B. Meltzer (Eds.),Symbolic interaction. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollner, M. On the foundations of mundane reason. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara, 1970. Portions are forthcoming inHuman Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H. Sociological description.Berkeley Journal of Sociology 1963,8 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H. Search for help: No one to turn to. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H. An initial investigation of the usability of conversational data for doing sociology. In D. Sudnow (Ed.),Studies in social Interaction. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1972. (a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H. On the analyzability of stories by children. In J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.),Directions in sociolinguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1972. (b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation.Language 1974,50 696–735.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. Notes on a conversational practice: Formulating place. In D. Sudnow (Ed.),Studies in social interaction. New York: Free Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, A.Collected papers, I (M. Natanson, Ed.). the Hague: Nijhoff, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shibutani T. Reference groups as perspectives.American Journal of Sociology 1955,60 562–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, G. Appearances and the self. In A. Rose (Ed.),Human behavior and social processes. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, G., & Gross, E. Embarrassment and the analysis of role requirements.American Journal of Scoiology 1964,70 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A.George Herbert Mead on social psychology. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, W. I.Source book for social origins. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1909.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, M. S. Embarrassment: Its variable and invariable aspects.Social Forces 1968,46 382–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, C. & Zimmerman, D. H. Women's place in everyday talk: Reflections on parent-child interaction.Social Problems 1977,24. 521–530

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieder, D. L.Language and social reality: The case of the convict code. London: Mouton Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, T. P. Conceptions of interaction and forms of sociological explanation.American Sociological Review 1970,35 697–709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, D. H., & Pollner, M. The everyday world as a phenomenon. In J. Douglas (Ed.),Understanding everyday life. Chicago: Aldine, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, D. H., & West, C. Sex roles, interruptions and silences in conversation. In B. Thorne & N. Henley (Eds.),Language and sex: Difference and dominance. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Reprints of this paper may be obtained from Marilyn Lester at Department of Sociology, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Nevada 89154.

We wish to thank the following people who read and commented on one or more versions of this work: Odis Bigus, Allen Grimshaw, Candace West, Graham Tomlinson, and Don Zimmerman. We also wish to thank Carolyn Mullins for editorial assistance.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hadden, S.C., Lester, M. Talking identity: The production of “self” in interaction. Hum Stud 1, 331–356 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02132622

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02132622

Keywords

Navigation