Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Degrees of Belief pp 121–159Cite as

Non-Additive Degrees of Belief

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 342))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary. http://www.m-w.com

  • Oxford English Dictionary. http://dictionary.oed.com

  • Anonymous Author: A calculation of the credibility of human testimony. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 21, 359–365 (1699)

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, J.A.: Computational methods for a mathematical theory of evidence. In: P.J. Hayes (ed.) IJCAI’81, 7th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 868–875. Vancouver, Canada (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernoulli, J.: Ars Conjectandi. Thurnisiorum, Basel (1713)

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, D.: Theory of Committees and Elections. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, USA (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, P., de Rijke, M., Venema, Y.: Modal Logic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Boole, G.: The Laws of Thought. Walton and Maberley, London (1854)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottema, O.: On the area of a triangle in barycentric coordinates. Crux Mathematicorum 8, 228–231 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, M.: Algebraic structures related to Dempster-Shafer theory. In: B. Bouchon-Meunier, R.R. Yager, L.A. Zadeh (eds.) IPMU’94, 5th International Conference on Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems, LNCS 945, pp. 51–61. Paris, France (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • de Finetti, B.: La prévision: ses lois logiques, ses sources subjectives. Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré 7(1), 1–68 (1937)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempster, A.P.: Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 38, 325–339 (1967)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dempster, A.P.: A generalization of Bayesian inference. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 30(2), 205–247 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempster, A.P.: The Dempster-Shafer calculus for statisticians. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 48(2), 365–377 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douven, I.: Decision theory and the rationality of further deliberation. Economics and Philosophy 18(2), 303–328 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, A.C.: The sign of four. Lippincott’s Magazine (1890a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, A.C.: A study in scarlet, pt. 2. Beeton’s Christmas Annual (1890b)

    Google Scholar 

  • E. H. Shortliffe, Buchanan G.B.: A model of inexact reasoning in medicine. Mathematical Biosciences 351–379(23) (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edgeworth, F.Y.: Probability. In: H. Chisholm (ed.) Encyclopædia Britannica, vol. 22, 11th edn., pp. 376–403. University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK (1911)

    Google Scholar 

  • Edman, M.: Adding independent pieces of evidence. In: Modality, Morality and other Problems of Sense and Nonsense: Essays dedicated to Sören Halldén, pp. 180–191. CWK Gleerups, Lund, Sweden (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekelöf, P.O.: Rättegång, 6th edn. Norstedts Juridik AB, Stockholm, Sweden (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellsberg, D.: Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms. Quarterly Journal of Economics 75, 643–669 (1961)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, G.W.: Dictionary of Paradox. University Press of America, Lanham, MD (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Feynman, R.P., Leighton, R.B., Sands, M.: The Feynman Lectures on Physics, vol. I, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley, Tucson, A2 (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gärdenfors, P., Hansson, B., Sahlin, N.E. (eds.): Evidentiary Value: Philosophical, Judicial and Psychological Aspects of a Theory. CWK Gleerups, Lund, Sweden (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilboa, I.: Expected utility with purely subjective non-additive probabilities. Journal of Mathematical Economics 16, 65–88 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginsberg, M.: Non-monotonic reasoning using Dempster’s rule. In: R.J. Brachman (ed.) AAAI’84, 4th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 112–119. Austin, USA (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustason, W.: Reasoning from Evidence: Inductive Logic. Prentice Hall (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I.: The Emergence of Probability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I.: An Introduction to Probability and Inductive Logic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Haenni, R.: Are alternatives to Dempster’s rule alternatives? – Comments on “About the belief function combination and the conflict management problem”. International Journal of Information Fusion 3(3), 237–241 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haenni, R.: Ignoring ignorance is ignorant. Tech. rep., Center for Junior Research Fellows. University of Konstanz, Germany (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Haenni, R.: Ordered valuation algebras: a generic framework for approximating inference. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 37(1), 1–41 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haenni, R.: Shedding new light on Zadeh’s criticism of Dempster’s rule of combination. In: FUSION’05, 8th International Conference on Information Fusion, vol. 2, pp. 879–884. Philadelphia, USA (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Haenni, R.: Towards a unifying theory of logical and probabilistic reasoning. In: F.B. Cozman, R. Nau, T. Seidenfeld (eds.) ISIPTA’05, 4th International Symposium on Imprecise Probabilities and Their Applications, pp. 193–202. Pittsburgh, USA (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Haenni, R.: Using probabilistic argumentation for key validation in public-key cryptography. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 38(3), 355–376 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haenni, R.: Uncover Dempster’s rule where it is hidden. In: FUSION’06, 9th International Conference on Information Fusion, contribution No. 251. Florence, Italy (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Haenni, R.: Probabilistic argumentation. Journal of Applied Logic (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Haenni, R., Hartmann, S.: A general model for partially reliable information sources. In: P. Svensson, J. Schubert (eds.) FUSION’04, 7th International Conference on Information Fusion, vol. I, pp. 153–160. Stockholm, Sweden (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Haenni, R., Hartmann, S.: Modeling partially reliable information sources: a general approach based on Dempster-Shafer theory. International Journal of Information Fusion 7(4), 361–379 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haenni, R., Kohlas, J., Lehmann, N.: Probabilistic argumentation systems. In: D.M. Gabbay, P. Smets (eds.) Handbook of Defeasible Reasoning and Uncertainty Management Systems, vol. 5: Algorithms for Uncertainty and Defeasible Reasoning, pp. 221–288. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Haenni, R., Lehmann, N.: Building argumentation systems on set constraint logic. In: B. Bouchon-Meunier, R.R. Yager, L.A. Zadeh (eds.) Information, Uncertainty and Fusion, pp. 393–406. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Haenni, R., Lehmann, N.: Probabilistic argumentation systems: a new perspective on Dempster-Shafer theory. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, Special Issue on the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Evidence 18(1), 93–106 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hájek, P., Havránek, T., Jiroušek, R.: Uncertain Information Processing in Expert Systems. CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hájek, P., Valdés, J.J.: Generalized algebraic approach to uncertainty processing in rule-based expert systems (dempsteroids). Computers and Artificial Intelligence 10, 29–42 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrod, R.: Foundations of Inductive Logic. Macmillan, London (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawthorne, J.: Degree-of-belief and degree-of-support: Why Bayesians need both notions. Mind 114(454), 277–320 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawthorne, J.: Inductive logic. In: E.N. Zalta (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University, USA (2005). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2005/entries/logic-indu% ctive/

    Google Scholar 

  • Helton, J.C.: Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis in the presence of stochastic and subjective uncertainty. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 57, 3–76 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonczy, J., Haenni, R.: Credential networks: a general model for distributed trust and authenticity management. In: A. Ghorbani, S. Marsh (eds.) PST’05, 3rd Annual Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust, pp. 101–112. St. Andrews, Canada (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jøsang, A.: Artificial reasoning with subjective logic. In: A.C. Nayak, M. Pagnucco (eds.) 2nd Australian Workshop on Commonsense Reasoning. Perth, Australia (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jøsang, A.: A logic for uncertain probabilities. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems 9(3), 279–311 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jøsang, A.: The consensus operator for combining beliefs. Artificial Intelligence 141(1), 157–170 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jøsang, A., Bondi, V.A.: Legal reasoning with subjective logic. Artificial Intelligence and Law 8(4), 289–315 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katzner, D.W.: Time, Ignorance, and Uncertainty in Economic Models. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, M1 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelsey, D., Quiggin, J.: Theories of choice under ignorance and uncertainty. Journal of Economic Surveys 6(2), 133–53 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J.M.: A Treatise of Probability. Macmillan, London (1921)

    Google Scholar 

  • Khosla, D.: Method and apparatus for joint kinematic and feature tracking using probabilistic argumentation. United States Patent No. 7026979 (2006). http://www.wikipatents.com/ 7026979.html

  • Khosla, D., Chen, Y.: Joint kinematic and feature tracking using probabilistic argumentation. In: FUSION’03, 6th International Conference on Information Fusion, vol. I, pp. 11–16. Cairns, Australia (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlas, J.: Information Algebras: Generic Stuctures for Inference. Springer, London (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlas, J.: Probabilistic argumentation systems: A new way to combine logic with probability. Journal of Applied Logic 1(3–4), 225–253 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlas, J., Monney, P.A.: Propagating belief functions through constraint systems. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 5, 433–461 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlas, J., Monney, P.A.: A Mathematical Theory of Hints – An Approach to the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Evidence, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol. 425. Springer (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlas, J., Shenoy, P.P.: Computation in valuation algebras. In: D.M. Gabbay, P. Smets (eds.) Handbook of Defeasible Reasoning and Uncertainty Management Systems, vol. 5: Algorithms for Uncertainty and Defeasible Reasoning, pp. 5–39. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlas, R.: Decentralized trust evaluation and public-key authentication. Ph.D. thesis, University of Bern, Switzerland (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlas, R., Jonczy, J., Haenni, R.: A trust evaluation method based on logic and probability theory. In: Y. Karabulut, J. Mitchell, P. Herrmann, C.D. Jensen (eds.) IFIPTM’08, 2nd Joint iTrust and PST Conferences on Privacy Trust Management and Security, pp. 17–32. Trondheim, Norway (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopman, B.O.: The axioms and algebra of intuitive probability. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 41, 269–292 (1940)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyburg, H.E.: Probability and Inductive Logic. Macmillan, New York, USA (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyburg, H.E.: Higher order probabilities and intervals. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 2, 195–209 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, J.H.: Neues Organon oder Gedanken über die Erforschung und Bezeichnung des Wahren und dessen Unterscheidung vom Irrtum und Schein. Johann Wendler, Leipzig (1764)

    Google Scholar 

  • Laplace, P.S.: Théorie Analytique des Probabilités, 3ème edn. Courcier, Paris (1820)

    Google Scholar 

  • Laskey, K.B., Lehner, P.E.: Assumptions, beliefs and probabilities. Artificial Intelligence 41(1), 65–77 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • List, C.: On the significance of the absolute margin. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55(3), 521–544 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • List, C., Goodin, R.E.: Epistemic democracy: Generalizing the Condorcet jury theorem. Journal of Political Philosophy 9(3), 277–306 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marquis de Condorcet: Essai sur l’application de l’analyse à la probabilité des décisions rendues à la pluralité des voix. L’Imprimerie Royale, Paris, France (1785)

    Google Scholar 

  • Matheron, G.: Random Sets and Integral Geometry. John Wiley and Sons, New York (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, H.T.: On random sets and belief functions. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 63, 531–542 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, H.T., Walker, E.A.: On decision making using belief functions. In: R.R. Yager, J. Kacprzyk, M. Fedrizzi (eds.) Advances in the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Evidence, pp. 311–330. John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Older, W., Vellino, A.: Constraint arithmetic on real intervals. In: F. Benhamou, A. Colmerauer (eds.) Constraint Logic Programming: Selected Research, pp. 175–196. MIT Press (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, J.: The Uncertain Reasoner’s Companion – a Mathematical Perspective. No. 39 in Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearl, J.: How to do with probabilities what people say you can’t. In: CAIA’85, 2nd IEEE Conference on AI Applications, pp. 6–12. Miami, USA (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearl, J.: Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, USA (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearl, J.: Reasoning with belief functions: An analysis of compatibility. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 4(5–6), 363–389 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, K.: The History of Statistics in the 17th and 18th Centuries against the Changing Background of Intellectual, Scientific and Religious Thought: Lectures by Karl Pearson given at University College (London) during the Academic Sessions 1921–1933. Lubrecht & Cramer, London, U.K. (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Picard, J., Savoy, J.: Using probabilistic argumentation systems to search and classify web sites. IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin 24(3), 33–41 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, F.P.: Truth and probability. In: R.B. Braithwaite (ed.) The Foundations of Mathematics and other Logical Essays, chap. 7, pp. 156–198. Routledge, London, U.K. (1926)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogova, G.L., Scott, P.D., Lollett, C.: Higher level fusion for post-disaster casualty mitigation operations. In: FUSION’05, 8th International Conference on Information Fusion, contribution No. C10-1, vol. 2. Philadelphia, USA (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogova, G.L., Scott, P.D., Lollett, C., Mudiyanur, R.: Reasoning about situations in the early post-disaster response environment. In: FUSION’06, 9th International Conference on Information Fusion, contribution No. 211. Florence, Italy (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruspini, E.H.: The logical foundations of evidential reasoning. Tech. Rep. 408, SRI International, AI Center, Menlo Park, USA (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruspini, E.H., Lowrance, J., Strat, T.: Understanding evidential reasoning. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 6(3), 401–424 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahlin, N.E., Rabinowicz, W.: The evidentiary value model. In: D.M. Gabbay, P. Smets (eds.) Handbook of Defeasible Reasoning and Uncertainty Management Systems, vol. 1: Quantified Representation of Uncertainty and Imprecision, pp. 247–266. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarin, R.H., Wakker, P.P.: A simple axiomatization of nonadditive expected utility. Econometrica 60, 1255–1272 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmeidler, D.: Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity. Econometrica 57(3), 571–587 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schum, D.A.: Probability and the process of discovery, proof, and choice. Boston University Law Review 66(3–4), 825–876 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackle, G.L.S.: A non-additive measure of uncertainty. Review of Economic Studies 17(1), 70–74 (1949)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shackle, G.L.S.: Expectation in Economics, 2 edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (1952)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackle, G.L.S.: The logic of surprise. Economica, New Series 20(78), 112–117 (1953)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, G.: A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, G.: Non-additive probabilities in the work of Bernoulli and Lambert. Archive for History of Exact Sciences 19, 309–370 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, G.: Perspectives on the theory and practice of belief functions. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 4(5–6), 323–362 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, G.: The early development of mathematical probability. In: I. Grattan-Guinness (ed.) Companion Encyclopedia of the History and Philosophy of the Mathematical Sciences, pp. 1293–1302. Routledge, London, U.K. (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, G.: The significance of Jacob Bernoulli’s Ars Conjectandi for the philosophy of probability today. Journal of Econometrics 75, 15–32 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shenoy, P.P.: Valuation-based systems: A framework for managing uncertainty in expert systems. In: L.A. Zadeh, J. Kacprzyk (eds.) Fuzzy Logic for the Management of Uncertainty, pp. 83–104. John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shenoy, P.P., Shafer, G.: Axioms for probability and belief-function propagation. In: R.D. Shachter, T.S. Levitt, J.F. Lemmer, L.N. Kanal (eds.) UAI’88, 4th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 169–198. Minneapolis, USA (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Smarandache, F., Dezert, J.: Advances and Applications of DSmT for Information Fusion. American Research Press (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Smets, P.: The combination of evidence in the Transferable Belief Model. IEEE Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 12, 447–458 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smets, P.: Probability of provability and belief functions. Journal de la Logique et Analyse 133, 177–195 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • Smets, P.: Quantifying beliefs by belief functions: An axiomatic justification. In: R. Bajcsy (ed.) IJCAI’93: 13th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 598–603. Chambéry, France (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • Smets, P.: Analyzing the combination of conflicting belief functions. Information Fusion 8(4), 387–412 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smets, P., Kennes, R.: The transferable belief model. Artificial Intelligence 66, 191–234 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C.A.B.: Consistency in statistical inference and decision. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 23, 31–37 (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  • Smithson, M.: Ignorance and Uncertainty. Springer (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Spohn, W.: Ordinal conditional functions: A dynamic theory of epistemic states. In: W.L. Harper, B. Skyrms (eds.) Causation in Decision, Belief Change, and Statistics, vol. II, pp. 105–134. Kluwer Academic Publishers (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Spohn, W.: Survey of ranking theory. In: F. Huber, C. Schmidt-Petri (eds.) Degrees of Belief. Springer (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Uchii, S.: Sherlock Holmes and probabilistic induction (1991). http://www1.kcn.ne.jp/h-uchii/ Holmes/index.html

  • Van Fraassen, B.C.: Laws and Symmetry. Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K. (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • Walley, P.: Statistical Reasoning with Imprecise Probabilities. Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability 42. Chapman and Hall, London, U.K. (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • Walley, P., Fine, T.L.: Towards a frequentist theory of upper and lower probability. Annals of Statistics 10, 741–761 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, J.: Objective Bayesian nets. In: S.N. Artëmov, H. Barringer, A.S. d’Avila Garcez, L.C. Lamb, J. Woods (eds.) We Will Show Them! Essays in Honour of Dov Gabbay, vol. 22, pp. 713–730. College Publications (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, N.: Uncertain linear constraints. In: R. López de Mántaras, L. Saitta (eds.) ECAI’04: 16th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 231–235. Valencia, Spain (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yager, R.R., Liping, L. (eds.): Classic Works of the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Belief Functions, Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol. 219. Springer (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yen, J.: Can evidence be combined in the Dempster-Shafer theory? International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 2(3), 346–347 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L.A.: On the validity of Dempster’s rule of combination of evidence. Tech. Rep. 79/24, University of California, Berkely (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L.A.: A mathematical theory of evidence (book review). AI Magazine 55(81–83) (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L.A.: A simple view of the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence and its implication for the rule of combination. AI Magazine 7(2), 85–90 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Bern Institute of Computer Science and Applied Mathematics Neubrückstrasse 10, CH–3012 Bern, Switzerland

    Rolf Haenni

Authors
  1. Rolf Haenni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Formal Epistemology Research Group Zukunftskolleg and Department of Philosophy, University of Konstanz, P.O. Box X906, 78457 Konstanz, Germany

    Franz Huber

  2. Department of Philosophy, University of Leipzig, 04009 Leipzig, Germany

    Christoph Schmidt-Petri

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Haenni, R. (2009). Non-Additive Degrees of Belief. In: Huber, F., Schmidt-Petri, C. (eds) Degrees of Belief. Synthese Library, vol 342. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9198-8_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation