Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T03:51:30.821Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Do Conspiracies Tend to Fail? Philosophical Reflections on a Poorly Supported Academic Meme

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2022

Kurtis Hagen Open the ORCID record for Kurtis Hagen [Opens in a new window]
Kurtis Hagen*
Affiliation:
Independent scholar
*
Email: kurtishagen@yahoo.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Critics of conspiracy theories often charge that such theories are implausible because conspiracies of the kind they allege tend to fail. Thus, according to these critics, conspiracy theories that have been around for a while would have been, in all likelihood, already exposed if they had been real. So, they reason, they probably are not. In this article, I maintain that the arguments in support of this view are unconvincing. I do so by examining a list of four sources recently cited in support of the claim that conspiracies tend to fail. I pay special attention to two of these sources, an article by Brian Keeley, and, especially, an article by David Grimes, which is perhaps the single “best” article in support of the idea that conspiracies tend to fail. That is, it offers the most explicit and elaborate attempt to establish this view. Further, that article has garnered significant (uncritical) attention in the mainstream press. I argue that Grimes's argument does not succeed, that the common assertion that conspiracies tend to fail remains poorly supported, and that there are good reasons to think that at least some types of conspiracies do not tend to fail.

Keywords

Conspiraciesconspiracy theoryepistemologyGrimesTuskegee study
Type
Article
Information
Episteme , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , June 2023 , pp. 429 - 448
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aston, J. (2012). ‘MMR Doctor John Walker-Smith Wins High Court Appeal.’ The Independent (7 March). https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/mmr-doctor-john-walker-smith-wins-high-court-appeal-7543114.html.Google Scholar
Barajas, J. (2016). ‘How Many People Does it Take to Keep a Conspiracy Alive?’ PBS News Hour (15 February). https://www.pbs.org/newshour/science/math-formula-charts-the-lifespan-of-hoaxes.Google Scholar
Barry, K. (2015). Vaccine Whistleblower: Exposing Autism Research Fraud at the CDC. New York, NY: Skyhorse Publishing.Google Scholar
Basham, L. (2001). ‘Living with the Conspiracy.’ The Philosophical Forum 32(3), 265–80. (Reprinted in Coady 2006.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basham, L. (2018). ‘Joining the Conspiracy.’ Argumenta 3(2)(‘Issue 6’), 271–90.Google Scholar
Berezow, A. (2016). ‘Math Study Shows Conspiracies ‘Prone to Unravelling’.’ BBC (26 January 2016). https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-35411684.Google Scholar
Clarke, S. (2002). ‘Conspiracy Theories and Conspiracy Theorizing.’ Philosophy of the Social Sciences 32, 131–50. (Reprinted in Coady 2006.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coady, D. (2003). ‘Conspiracy Theories and Official Stories.’ International Journal of Applied Philosophy 17(2), 197–209. (Reprinted in Coady 2006.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coady, D. (ed.) (2006). Conspiracy Theories: The Philosophical Debate. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
Coady, D. (2012). What to Believe Now: Applying Epistemology to Contemporary Issues. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Coady, D. (2018). ‘Anti-Rumor Campaigns and Conspiracy-Bating as Propaganda.’ In Dentith, M.R.X. (ed.), Taking Conspiracy Theories Seriously, pp. 171–87. London: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Dai, Y. and Handley-Schachler, M. (2015). ‘A Fundamental Weakness in Auditing: The Need for a Conspiracy Theory.’ Procedia Economics and Finance 28, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01074-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dentith, M.R.X. (2019). ‘Conspiracies on the Basis of the Evidence.’ Synthese 196, 2243–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1532-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, K.M., Uscinski, J.E., Sutton, R.M., Cichocka, A., Nefes, T., Chee, C.S. and Deravi, F. (2019). ‘Understanding Conspiracy Theories.’ Advances in Political Psychology 40(1). doi: 10.1111/pops.12568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elisha, E., Guetzkow, J., Shir-Raz, Y. and Ronel, N. (2021). ‘Retraction of Scientific Papers: The Case of Vaccine Research.’ Critical Public Health. doi: 10.1080/09581596.2021.1878109.Google Scholar
Fonzi, G. (1993). The Last Investigation. New York, NY: Skyhorse.Google Scholar
Goertzal, T. (2010). ‘Conspiracy Theories in Science.’ EMBO Reports 11(7), 493–9. doi: 10.1038/embor. 2010.84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimes, D.R. (2016). ‘On the Viability of Conspiratorial Beliefs.’ PLoS ONE 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147905.Google ScholarPubMed
Hagen, K. (2010). ‘Is Infiltration of ‘Extremist Groups’ Justified?’ International Journal of Applied Philosophy 24(2), 153–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagen, K. (2020). ‘Should Academics Debunk Conspiracy Theories?’ Social Epistemology 34(5), 423–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancock, L. (2006). Someone Would Have Talked: The Assassination of President John F. Kennedy and the Conspiracy to Mislead History. Southlake, TX: JFK Lancer Productions & Publications.Google Scholar
Hertsgaard, M. (2016). ‘How the Pentagon Punished NSA Whistleblowers.’ The Guardian (22 May). https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/may/22/how-pentagon-punished-nsa-whistleblowers.Google Scholar
Institute of Medicine (2013). The Childhood Immunization Schedule and Safety: Stakeholder Concerns, Scientific Evidence, and Future Studies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13563.Google Scholar
Keeley, B.L. (1999). ‘Of Conspiracy Theories.’ Journal of Philosophy 96, 109–26. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1084585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, N. (2007). ‘Radically Socialized Knowledge and Conspiracy Theories.’ Episteme 4(2), 181–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, B. (2020). ‘Dealing with Conspiracy Theory Attributions,’ Social Epistemology 34(5), 409–22. doi: 10.1080/02691728.2020.1748744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonnell, T. (2016). ‘This Chart Shows Why Your Conspiracy Theory Is Really Dumb.’ Mother Jones (1 February). https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/02/you-are-wrong/.Google Scholar
Ohlheiser, A. (2016). ‘Why the Internet's Biggest Conspiracy Theories Don't Make Mathematical Sense.’ The Washington Post (28 January). https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-intersect/wp/2016/01/28/the-internets-favorite-conspiracies-would-involve-too-many-people-to-stay-secret-says-science/.Google Scholar
Pauly, M. (n.d.). ‘Conspiracy Theories.’ Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://iep.utm.edu/conspira/ (last accessed 19 March 2021).Google Scholar
Pigden, C. (1995). ‘Popper Revisited, or What is Wrong with Conspiracy Theories?’ Philosophy of the Social Sciences 25, 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/004839319502500101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popper, K. (1972). Conjectures and Refutations, 4th edition. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Prouty, F. (2011). The Secret Team, 2nd edition. New York, NY: Skyhorse Publishing.Google Scholar
Räikkä, J. (2009). ‘On Political Conspiracy Theories.’ Journal of Political Philosophy 17(2), 185–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, E. (2017). ‘The Moon Landing is Not a Conspiracy Theory – and this Equation Explains Why.’ Wired (2 May). https://www.wired.co.uk/article/conspiracy-theories-equation.Google Scholar
Reverby, S.M. (2009). Examining Tuskegee: The Infamous Syphilis Study and its Legacy. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Schou, N. (2009). Kill the Messenger: How the CIA's Crack-Cocaine Controversy Destroyed Journalist Gary Webb. New York, NY: Bold Type Books.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. and Vermeule, A. (2009). ‘Conspiracy Theories: Causes and Cures.’ Journal of Political Philosophy 17(2), 202–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, W.W. (2014). ‘Statement of William W. Thompson, Ph.D., Regarding the 2004 Article Examining the Possibility of a Relationship Between MMR Vaccine and Autism.’ https://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/William-Thompson-statement-27-August-2014.pdf.Google Scholar
Welna, D. (2014). ‘Before Snowden: The Whistleblowers Who Tried to Lift The Veil.’ NPR, Morning Edition (22 July). https://www.npr.org/2014/07/22/333741495/before-snowden-the-whistleblowers-who-tried-to-lift-the-veil.Google Scholar
Willingham, E. (2015). ‘A Congressman, A CDC Whisteblower [sic] and an Autism Tempest in a Trashcan.’ Forbes (6 August). https://www.forbes.com/sites/emilywillingham/2015/08/06/a-congressman-a-cdc-whisteblower-and-an-autism-tempest-in-a-trashcan/?sh=417978d65396.Google Scholar
Wolf, Z.B. (2007). ‘Big Brother Spying on Americans’ Internet Data?’ ABC News (7 November). https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=3833172&page=1.Google Scholar
WNN Staff. (2017). ‘Dr. Whitehurst and the FBI Lab Scandal.’ Whistleblower News Network (21 November). https://whistleblowersblog.org/2017/11/articles/intelligence-community-whistleblowers/dr-whitehurst-and-the-fbi-lab-scandal/.Google Scholar