REFERENCES
Garrison, J.: 1995, ‘Dewey's Philosophy and the Experience of Working: Labor, Tools and Language’, Synthese 105, 87–114.
Hager, P.: 1994, Continuity and Change in the Development of Russell's Philosophy. Nijhoff International Philosophy Series, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
Hager, P.: 1996, ‘Professional Practice in Education: Research and Issues’, Australian Journal of Education 40(3), 235–247.
Hickman, L.: 1990, John Dewey's Pragmatic Technology, Indiana University Press, Bloomington & Indianapolis.
Irvine, A. D. & Wedeking, G. A. (eds.): 1993, Russell and Analytic Philosophy, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
Meyer, S. (ed.): 1985, Dewey and Russell: An Exchange, Philosophical Library, New York.
Novak, J.: 1995, ‘Why I Am Not a Russellian’, Bertrand Russell Society Quarterly 88, November, 33–34 (reprinted from Free Inquiry, Fall 1995).
Tiles, J. E.: 1988, Dewey (The Arguments of the Philosophers Series), Routledge, London & New York.
Tiles, J. E.: 1992, ‘Introduction: Nature, Knowledge and Naturalism’, in J.E. Tiles (ed.), John Dewey: Critical Assessments (Vol. IV: Nature, Knowledge and Naturalism), Routledge, London & New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hager, P.J. Tom Burke, Dewey's New Logic: A Reply to Russell. Studies in Philosophy and Education 17, 57–61 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005071515162
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005071515162