Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-10T07:50:01.921Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Learning in simple systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 April 2009

Geoffrey Hall
Geoffrey Hall
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of York, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom. gh1@york.ac.ukhttp://www.york.ac.uk/depts/psych/www/people/biogs/gh1.html
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Studies of conditioning in simple systems are best interpreted in terms of the formation of excitatory links. The mechanisms responsible for such conditioning contribute to the associative learning effects shown by more complex systems. If a dual-system approach is to be avoided, the best hope lies in developing standard associative theory to deal with phenomena said to show propositional learning.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 32 , Issue 2 , April 2009 , pp. 210 - 211
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Carew, T. J., Hawkins, R. D. & Kandel, E. R. (1983) Differential classical conditioning of a defensive withdrawal reflex in Aplysia californica. Science 219:397–400.Google Scholar
Hall, G. (2002) Associative structures in Pavlovian and instrumental conditioning. In: Stevens' handbook of experimental psychology, vol. 3, 3rd edition, ed. Gallistel, C. R., pp. 1–45. Wiley.Google Scholar
Mauk, M. D. & Thompson, R. F. (1987) Retention of classically conditioned eyelid responses following acute decerebration. Brain Research 403:89–95.Google Scholar
Rescorla, R. A. & Wagner, A. R. (1972) A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and non-reinforcement. In: Classical conditioning: Current theory and research, vol. 2, ed. Black, A. H. & Prokasy, W. F., pp. 64–99. Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Wagner, A. R. (1981) SOP: A model of automatic memory processing in animal behavior. In: Information processing in animals: Memory mechanisms, ed. Spear, N. E. & Miller, R. R., pp. 5–47. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Wagner, A. R. & Donegan, N. H. (1989) Some relationships between a computational model (SOP) and a neural circuit for Pavlovian (rabbit eyeblink) conditioning. In: Computational models of learning in simple neural systems, ed. Hawkins, R. D. & Bower, G. H., pp. 157–203. Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar