REFERENCES
Barnes, E.: 1992. ‘Explanatory Unification and Scientific Understanding’, Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 1, 3–12.
Bartelborth, T.: 1996, ‘Scientific Explanation’, in U. C. Moulines (ed.), Structuralist Theory of Science: Focal Issues, New Results, de Gruyter, New York, pp. 23–43.
Churchman, C. and R. Ackoff: 1946, ‘Varieties of Unification’, Philosophy of Science 13, 287–300.
Fölsing, A.: 1997, Albert Einstein: A Biography, Viking, New York.
Forster, M.: 1988, ‘Unification, Explanation, and the Composition of Causes in Newtonian Mechanics’, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 19, 55–101.
Gemes, K.: 1994, ‘Explanation, Unification and Content’, Nous 28, 225–40.
Grosholz, E.: 1980, ‘Descartes'z Unification of Algebra and Geometry’, in S. Gaukroger (ed.), Descartes: Philosophy, Mathematics and Physics, Harvester Press, Sussex, U.K., pp. 156–68.
Grosholz, E.: 1985, ‘Two Episodes in the Unification of Logic and Topology’, British Journal of the Philosophy of Science 36, 147–57.
Halonen, I. and J. Hintikka: (Forthcoming), ‘Toward a Theory of the Process of Explanation’, Synthese.
Hempel, C.: 1965, Aspects of Scientific Explanation, Free Press, New York.
Hintikka, J.: 1988, “What is the Logic of Experimental Inquiry?', Synthese 74, 133–90.
Hintikka, J.: 1990, ‘Paradigms for Language Theory’,Acta Philosophica Fennica 49, 181–209.
Hintikka, J.: 1992, The Concept of Induction in the Light of the Interrogative Approach to Inquiry', in J. Earman (ed.), Inference, Explanation and Other Frustrations, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, pp. 23–43.
Hintikka, J.: 1995, ‘What is Elementary Logic?’, in K. Gavroglu, J. Stachel and M. Wartofsky (eds.), Physics, Philosophy and the Scientific Community, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 301–26.
Hintikka, J. and I. Halonen: 1995, ‘Semantics and Pragmatics forWhy-questions’, Journal of Philosophy 92, 636–57.
Hintikka, J., I. Halonen, and A. Mutanen: ‘Interrogative Logic as a General Theory of Reasoning’, in Jaakko Hintikka (ed.), Inquiry as Inquiry: A Logic of Scientific Discovery, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 47–90.
Hintikka, J. and U. Remes: 1974, The Method of Analysis, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.
Humphreys, P.: 1993, ‘Greater Unification Equals Greater Understanding?’, Analysis 53, 183–8.
Jones, T.: 1995a, ‘How the Unification Theory of Explanation Escapes Asymmetry Problems’, Erkenntnis 43, 229–40.
Jones, T.: 1995b, ‘Reductionism and the Unification Theory of Explanation’, Philosophy of Science 62, 21–30.
Jones, T.: 1997, ‘Unification, Reduction, and Non-Ideal Explanations’, Synthese 112, 75–96.
Kanitscheider, B. 1991, ‘Unification as an Epistemological Problem’, in G. Schurz (ed.), Advances in Scientific Philosophy, Rodopi, Amsterdam.
Kitcher, P.: 1976. ‘Explanation, Conjunction, and Unification’, Journal of Philosophy 73, 207–12
Kitcher, P.: 1981, ‘Explanatory Unification’, Philosophy of Science 48, 507–11.
Kitcher, P.: 1985, ‘Two Approaches to Explanation’, Journal of Philosophy 82, 632–9.
Kitcher, P.: 1989, ‘Explanatory Unification and the Causal Structure of the World’, in P. Kitcher and W. Salmon (eds.), pp. 410–505.
Kitcher, P. and W. Salmon (eds.): 1989, Scientific Explanation, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 13, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
Mach, 1960, The Science of Mechanics, Open Court, La Salle, CA.
Morrison, M.: 1990, ‘Unification, Realism and Inference’, British Journal of the Philosophy of Science 41, 305–32.
Morrison, M.: 1992, ‘A Study in Theory Unification: The Case of Maxwell's Electromagnetic Theory’, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 23, 103–45.
Newton, 1952, Opticks (based on the fourth edition, London 1730), Dover, New York
Newton, I.: 1952, in H. S. Thayer (ed.), Newton's Philosophy of Nature, Hafner, New York
Pais, A.: 1982, “Subtle is the Lord”: The Science and the Life of Albert Einstein, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Salmon, W.: 1990, ‘Scientific Explanation: Causation and Unification’, Critica 22, 3–24.
Schurtz, G.: 1997, ‘Unification, Understanding and Scientific Progress’, in G. Meggle (ed.), Analyomen 2, Volume I: Logic, Epistemology, Philosophy of Science, de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 481–94.
Szekely, D.: 1969, ‘The Principles of the Theory of the Unification of Sciences’, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 10, 181–213.
Van Fraassen, B.: 1977, ‘The Pragmatics of Explanation’, American Philosophical Quarterly 14, 143–50.
Weber, E.: 1995, ‘Some Problems for Kitcher's Unification Account of Explanation’, Communication and Cognition 28, 441–55.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Halonen, I., Hintikka, J. Unification – It's Magnificent But Is It Explanation?. Synthese 120, 27–47 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005202403274
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005202403274