Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Integrating Care Ethics and Design Thinking

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article explores the integration of the seemingly disparate notions of care ethics and design thinking. The business community has adapted “design thinking” from engineering and architecture to facilitate innovation and problem solving through participatory processes. “Care ethics” is a relational approach to morality characterized by a concern for context, empathy, and action. Although design thinking is receiving significant attention and application in business practices, care ethics has only achieved limited traction among business ethicists in academia. “Caring design” is offered as a mutually beneficial integration of the two ideas. Care ethics and design thinking have much in common. For example, the relational and responsive dimension of design thinking is analogous in some important ways, namely empathy and inquiry, to the relational and responsive approach of care ethics. The shared themes in care ethics and design thinking make the integration of the two plausible and reciprocal advantages make the combination compelling. Explicit ethical language can shape design thinking as more than a tool of productivity while the participatory processes of design thinking can aid in expanding the circle of care ethics as a social and political ethic. Furthermore, caring design may provide a palatable path for greater acceptance of care ethics among business professionals. An overview of design thinking and care ethics is offered prior to exploring how the synergies are mutually beneficial. The article concludes with a focus on how to educate the next generation of business students for caring design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allert, H., Sabine, R., & Richter, C. (Eds.). (n.d.). Design as inquiry: A manual. t[h]inker: Creating knowledge through design and conceptual innovation. http://www.knowledge-through-design.uni-kiel.de/component/k2/item/200-designasinquiryamanual. Accessed February 6, 2016, p. 10.

  • André, K. (2013). Why should business education care about care? Toward an educare perspective. Research Center ESSEC working paper 1315. https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00880241/document. Accessed June 1, 2016.

  • André, K., & Pache, A.-C. (2016). From caring entrepreneur to caring enterprise: Addressing the ethical challenges of scaling up social enterprises. Journal of Business Ethics, 133, 659–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB). (2004). Ethics education in business schools: Report of the ethics education task force. Fl: Tampa.

  • Baker, D. F., & Baker, S. J. (2012). To “catch the sparkling glow”: A canvas for creativity in the management classroom. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 11, 704–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennis, W., & O’Toole, J. (2005). How business schools lost their way. Harvard Business Review, 83, 96–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. (2009). Change by design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. New York: Harper Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cant, G., & Kulik, B. W. (2009). More than lip service: The development and implementation plan of an ethics decision-making framework for an integrated undergraduate business curriculum. Journal of Academic Ethics, 7, 231–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chadegania, A. A., & Jaria, A. (2016). Corporate ethical culture: Review of literature and introducing pp model. Procedia Economics and Finance, 36, 51–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, L. J., Peirce, E., Hartman, L. P., Hoffman, W. M., & Carrier, J. (2007). Ethics, CSR, and sustainability in the Financial Times top 50 global business schools: Baseline data and future research directions. Journal of Business Ethics, 73, 347–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Code, L. (2015). Care, concern, and advocacy: Is there a place for epistemic responsibility? Feminist Philosophical Quarterly, 1(1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, S. (2015). The core of care ethics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • d.school Stanford. (2012). ReDesigning theatre. http://dschool.stanford.edu/redesigningtheater/the-design-thinking-process/. Accessed July 16, 2016.

  • Dalmiya, V. (2002). Why should a knower care? Hypatia, 17(1), 34–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, D., & Martin, R. (2006). Design thinking and how it will change management education: An interview and discussion. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 5(4), 512–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faste, R. A. (2001). The human challenge in engineering design. International Journal of Engineering Education, 17(4 & 5), 327–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisman, R., & Galinsky, A. (2012). Can you train business school students to be ethical? The way we’re doing it now doesn’t work. We need a new way. Slate. http://www.slate.com/articles/business/the_dismal_science/2012/09/business_school_and_ethics_can_we_train_mbas_to_do_the_right_thing_.html. Accessed January 18, 2017.

  • Folkmann, M. N. (2013). The aesthetics of imagination in design. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E., & Liedtka, J. (1991). Corporate social responsibility: A critical approach. Business Horizons, 34(4), 92–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal, S. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4, 75–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glen, R., Suciu, C., & Baughn, C. (2014). The need for design thinking in business schools. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 13(4), 653–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halwani, R. (2003). Care ethics and virtue ethics. Hypatia, 18, 161–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamington, M. (2004). Embodied care: Jane Addams, Maurice Merleau-Ponty and feminist ethics. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamington, M. (2010). The will to care: Performance, expectation, and imagination. Hypatia, 25, 675–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamington, M. (2011). Care ethics, knowledge management, and the learning organization. In M. Hamington & M. Sander-Staudt (Eds.), Applying care ethics to business (pp. 245–258). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hamington, M., & Sander-Staudt, M. (Eds.). (2011). Applying care ethics to business. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawk, T. F. (2011). An ethic of care: A relational ethic for the relational characteristics of organizations. In M. Hamington & M. Sander-Staudt (Eds.), Applying care ethics to business (pp. 3–34). Springer.

  • Held, V. (2006). The ethics of care: Personal, political, global. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, M. L. (2000). Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • IDEO. (n.d.) Design Thinking for Educators Toolkit (2nd ed.). http://www.designthinkingforeducators.com/toolkit/. Accessed June 1, 2016.

  • IDEO.org. (2015). The field guide to human-centered design: A step-by-step guide that will get you solving problems like a designer. http://www.designkit.org/resources/1. Accessed June 1, 2016.

  • Jenkins, J. (2008). Creating the right environment for design. Design Management Review, 19(3), 16–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. (1993). The moral imagination: Implications of cognitive science for ethics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kimbell, L. (2012). Rethinking design thinking: Part II. Design and Culture, 4(2), 129–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koehn, D. (2011). Care ethics and unintended consequences. In M. Hamington & M. Sander-Staudt (Eds.), Applying care ethics to business (pp. 141–156). Springer.

  • Kolko, J. (2015). Design thinking comes of age. Harvard Business Review, 93, 66–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreutz, K. A., & Benz, K. D. (2014). Catalyzing tacit knowledge exchange with visual thinking techniques to achieve productive open innovation collaborations. In Open innovation: New product development essentials from the PDMA (Product Development and Management Association). Wiley & Sons.

  • Lammi, M., & Becker, K. (2013). Engineering design thinking. Journal of Technology Education, 24(2), 55–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampe, M. (1997). Increasing effectiveness in teaching ethics to undergraduate business students. Teaching Business Ethics, 1(1), 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liedkta, J. (1996). Feminist morality and competitive reality: A role for an ethic of care? Business Ethics Quarterly, 6(2), 179–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liedkta, J. (2014). Innovative ways companies are using design thinking. Strategy and Leadership, 42(2), 40–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liedtka, J., & Oglive, T. (2011). Designing for growth: A design thinking toolkit for managers. New York: Columbia Business School Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linsley, P. M., & Slack, R. E. (2013). Crisis management and an ethic of care: The case of northern rock bank. Journal of Business Ethics, 113, 285–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. (2005). Incorporating design thinking into firms. Rotman: The Magazine of the Rotman School of Management (Fall) (pp. 5–7).

  • McDonagh, D., & Thomas, J. (2010).  Rethinking design thinking: Empathy supporting innovation. Australasian Medical Journal, 3(8), 458–464.

  • McDonald, G. M., & Donleavy, G. D. (1995). Objections to the teaching of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 14(10), 839–853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metz, T., & Miller, S. C. (2016). Relational ethics. In H. LaFollette (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of ethics. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. C. (2012). The ethics of need: Agency, dignity, and obligation. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, C. Y., & DeMoss, M. (2009). Teaching ethics and social responsibility: An evaluation of undergraduate business education at the discipline level. Journal of Education for Business, 84, 213–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N. (2002). Starting at home: Caring and social policy. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N. (2010a). Complexity in caring and empathy. Abstracta Special Issue, V, 6–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N. (2010b). The maternal factor: Two paths to morality. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliner, P. M., & Oliner, S. P. (1995). Toward a caring society. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paillé, P. J., Mejía-Morelos, H., Marché-Paillé, A., Chen, C. C., & Chen, Y. (2016). Corporate greening, exchange process among co-workers, and ethics of care: An empirical study on the determinants of pro-environmental behaviors at coworkers-level. Journal of Business Ethics, 136, 655–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettersen, T. (2011). The ethics of care: Normative structures and empirical implications. Health Care Analysis, 19(1), 51–64.

  • Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. Gloucester: Peter Smith.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2012). ‘Nothing comes without its world’: Thinking with care. The Sociological Review, 60(2), 197–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Razzouk, R., & Shute, V. (2012). What is design thinking and why is it important? Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 330–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, F. (1999). Globalizing care: Ethics, feminist theory, and international relations. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, F. (2011). The ethics of care and global politics. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeldt, L. F., McDonald, D. M., & Youngblood, S. A. (1991). The teaching of business ethics: A survey of AACSB member schools. Journal of Business Ethics, 10, 237–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweitzer, J., Groeger, L., & Sobel, L. (2016). The design thinking mindset: An assessment of what we know and what we see in practice. Journal of Design, Business, and Society, 2(1), 71–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, D., McMaster, R., & Newholm, T. (2016). Care and commitment in ethical consumption: An exploration of the ‘attitude–behaviour gap’. Journal of Business Ethics, 136, 251–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simola, S. (2012). Exploring ‘‘embodied care’’ in relation to social sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 107, 473–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slote, M. (2007). The ethics of care and empathy. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Slote, M. (2010). Moral sentimentalism. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starkey, K., & Tempest, S. (2009). The winter of our discontent: The design challenge for business schools. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 8, 576–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. S., Ladkin, D., & Statler, M. (2015). Caring orientations: The normative foundations of the craft of management. Journal Business Ethics, 128, 575–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Hasso Plattner Institute of Design. (n.d.). Process guide: An introduction to design thinking. https://dschool.stanford.edu/sandbox/groups/designresources/wiki/36873/attachments/74b3d/ModeGuideBOOTCAMP2010L.pdf?sessionID=68deabe9f22d5b79bde83798d28a09327886ea4b. Accessed May 30, 2016.

  • Tronto, J. C. (1993). Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tronto, J. C. (2013). Caring democracy: Markets, equality, and justice. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Krogh, G. (1998). Care in knowledge creation. California Management Review, 40(3), 133–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Krogh, G., Ichijo, K., & Nonaka, I. (2000). Enabling knowledge creation: How to unlock the mystery of tacit knowledge and release the power of imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Werhane, P. (2002). Moral imagination and systems thinking. Journal of Business Ethics, 38, 33–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wicks, A. C., Gilbert, D. R., Jr., & Freeman, R. E. (1994). A feminist reinterpretation of the stakeholder concept. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4), 475–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm, W. J. (2010). Ethical reasoning instruction in non-ethics business courses: A non-intrusive approach. The Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 52(3), 152–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willey, S. L., Mansfield, N. R., & Sherman, M. B. (2012). Integrating ethics across the curriculum: A pilot study to assess students’ ethical reasoning. Journal of Legal Studies Education, 29(2), 263–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

My deep appreciation to Michael Flower and Albrecht Enders as well as to the anonymous reviewers for the Journal of Business Ethics whose insights and suggestions improved this article immensely.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Portland State University, 535 NE Retford Ave., Hillsboro, OR, 97124, USA

    Maurice Hamington

Authors
  1. Maurice Hamington
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maurice Hamington.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Author Maurice Hamington declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by the author.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hamington, M. Integrating Care Ethics and Design Thinking. J Bus Ethics 155, 91–103 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3522-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3522-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation