Skip to main content
Log in

Symmetry as a method of proof

  • Published:
Journal of Philosophical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper is a logical study of valid uses of symmetry in deductive reasoning, of what underlying principles make some appeals to symmetry legitimate but others illegitimate. The issue is first motivated informally. A framework is then given covering a fairly broad range of symmetry arguments, and the formulation of symmetry provided is shown to be a valid principle of reasoning, as is a slightly stronger principle of reasoning, one that is shown to be in some sense as strong as possible. The relationship between symmetry and isomorphism is discussed, and finally the framework is extended to a more general model-theoretic setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jon Barwise and John Etchemendy. Visual Information and Valid Reasoning. In Zimmerman and Cunningham (eds), Visulization in Mathematics. Mathematical Association of America, 1990.

  2. Jon Barwise and John Etchemendy. Hyperproof, CSLI, 1994.

  3. Solomon Feferman. Toward Useful Type-Free Theories I. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 49, 1984.

  4. Tore Langholm. Partiality, Truth, and Persistence. CSLI, 1988.

  5. R. G. Wolf. A Survey of Many-Valued Logic. In Dunn and Epstein (eds), Modern Uses of Multiple-Valued Logic. Reidel Publishing Company, 1977.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hammer, E. Symmetry as a method of proof. J Philos Logic 25, 523–543 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00257384

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00257384

Keywords

Navigation