Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-04T14:19:15.264Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Boundaries of “Good Behavior” and Judicial Competence: Exploring Responsibilities and Authority Limitations of Cognitive Specialists in the Regulation of Incapacitated Judges

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Brandon Hamm  and
Bryn S. Esplin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Both law and medicine rely on self-regulation and codes of professionalism to ensure duties are performed in a competent, ethical manner. Unlike physicians, however, judges are lawyers themselves, so judicial oversight is also self-regulation. As previous literature has highlighted, the hesitation to report a cognitively-compromised judge has resulted in an “opensecret” amongst lawyers who face numerous conflicts of interest.

Through a case study involving a senior judge with severe cognitive impairment, this article considers the unique ethical dilemmas that cognitive specialists may encounter when navigating duties to patient, society, and the medical profession, without clear legal guidance.

Systemic self-regulatory inadequacies in the legal profession are addressed, as well as challenges that arise when trying to preserve the trust and dignity of an incapacitated patient who must fulfill special duties to society.

Ultimately, because of their unique neurological expertise and impartial assessments, we submit that allowing cognitive specialists to submit their assessments to an internal judiciary board may act as an additional check and balance to ensure the fair and competent administration of justice.

Type
Independent Articles
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 46 , Issue 2: Law and the Opioid Crisis: An Inter-Disciplinary Examination , Summer 2018 , pp. 514 - 520
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hall, M. et al., “Trust in Physicians and Medical Institutions: What is it, Can in be Measured, and Does it Matter?” The Mil-bank Quarterly 79, no. 4 (2001): 613-639; C. Chantler and R. Ashton, “The Purpose and Limits of Professional Self-Regulation,” JAMA 302, no. 18 (2009): 2032-2033; F. Zacharias, “The Myth of Self-Regulation,” Minnesota Law Review 93, no. 4 (2009):1147-1190.Google Scholar
Cruess, L.R. and Cress, S.R., “Expectations and Obligations: Professionalism and Medicine’s Social Contract with Society,” Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 51, no. 4 (2008): 579-598.Google Scholar
See M. Hall et al., supra note 1.Google Scholar
Hamilton, A, “The Federalist No. 78,” in The Federalist Papers, ed. Rossiter, C. (NY: New American Library, 1961), at 469.Google Scholar
U.S. Const. Art. 3 § 1 (1787): “The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their office during good Behaviour and shall at stated Times receive for their Service a Compensation which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in office.”Google Scholar
See U.S. Constitution.Google Scholar
Shartel, B., “Federal Judges-Appointment, Supervision, and Removal-Some Possibilities under the Constitution,” Michigan Law Review 28, no. 7 (1930): 870-909.Google Scholar
Pratt, W.F., “Judicial Disability and the Good Behavior Clause,” Scholarly Works, paper 180 (1976): 706-720.Google Scholar
Fischer, J. M., “External Control over the American Bar,” Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics 19, no. S9 (2006): 59-110.Google Scholar
Walker, Y., “Protecting the Public: The Impact of the Americans with Disabilities Act on Licensure Considerations Involving Mentally Impaired Medical and Legal Professionals,” Journal of Legal Medicine 25, no. 4 (2004): 441-468; A. D’Amato, “Self-Regulation of Judicial Misconduct Could Be Mis-Regulation,” Michigan Law Review 89, no. 609 (1990): 609-623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, F., “The Task of Judging the Judges,” Judicature 59, no. 10 (1976): 458-467.Google Scholar
See F. Zacharias, supra note 1; See Y. Walker, supra note 10; See A. D’Amato, supra note 10; See F. Greenberg, supra note 11.Google Scholar
American Bar Association, “Preamble and Scope” in “Model Rules of Professional Conduct” (2016), available at <http://www.americanbar.org/groups/professional_responsibility/publications/model_rules_of_professional_conduct/model_rules_of_professional_conduct_preamble_scope.html> (last visited May 20, 2018).+(last+visited+May+20,+2018).>Google Scholar
Administrative Office of the United States Courts, “Guide to Judiciary Policy,” Vol. 2A, Ch. 2, (2017) available at <http://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/vol02a-ch02_0.pdf> (last visited May 20, 2018).+(last+visited+May+20,+2018).>Google Scholar
Goldstein, J., “Life Tenure for Federal Judges Raises Issues of Senility, Dementia,” ProPublica (2011), available at <www.propublica.org/article/life-tenure-for-federal-judges-raises-issues-of-senility-dementia> (last visited May 20, 2018).+(last+visited+May+20,+2018).>Google Scholar
Herbert, L.E., Weuve, J., Scherr, P.A., and Evans, D.A.. “Alzheimer Disease in the United States (2010-2050) Estimated Using the 2010 Census,” Neurology 80, no. 19 (2013): 1778-1783.Google Scholar
See J. Goldstein, supra note 15.Google Scholar
Deere v. Cullen, 718 F3d 1124: §13.52 (9th Cir. 2013).Google Scholar
See Y. Walker, supra note 10.Google Scholar
42 U.S. Code § 11101-11152 (1986).Google Scholar
OR Rev Stat § 807.710 “Reports of Persons with Cognitive or Functional Impairment.” (2015).Google Scholar
N. American Medical Association, “Impaired Drivers and Their Physicians,” Code of Medical Ethics sect 8.2 (2016), available at <https://www.ama-assn.org/sites/default/files/media-browser/code-2016-ch8.pdf> (last visited May 20, 2018).+(last+visited+May+20,+2018).>Google Scholar
Berger, J.T. and Rosner, F., “Ethical Challenges Posed by Dementia and Driving,” The Journal of Clinical Ethics 11, no. 4 (2000): 304-308.Google Scholar
Song, J. and Terry, P., “A Pedophilic Pediatrician: The Conflicting Obligations,” Journal of Clinical Ethics 10, no. 2(1999):142-150.Google Scholar
Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California, 17 Cal. 3d 425 (S. Ct. 1976). Under the Tarasoff ruling, the Supreme Court of California ruled that mental health professionals at Cowell Memorial Hospital had a “duty to warn” suspected victim, Tatiana Tarasoff, of fellow student Poddar Prosenjit’s intent to kill her after Prosenjit disclosed his specific intent to Dr. Lawrence Moore during a psychotherapy session two months earlier.Google Scholar
Keating, H. and Ackerman, T, “When the Doctor’s on Drugs,” Hastings Center Report 21, no. 5 (1991): 29-31.Google Scholar
Schouten, R., “Impaired Physicians: Is There a Duty to Report to State Licensing Boards?” Harvard Review of Psychiatry 8, no. 1 (2000): 36–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Bar Association, Formal Opinion 03-431 “Lawyer’s Duty to Report Rule Violations by Another Lawyer Who May Suffer from Disability or Impairment” (2003) available at <http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/migrated/cpr/clientpro/03_431.authcheckdam.pdf> (last visited May 20, 2018). See ABA Formal Opinion 03-429 for more discussion of mental impairments that affect a lawyer only on occasion.+(last+visited+May+20,+2018).+See+ABA+Formal+Opinion+03-429+for+more+discussion+of+mental+impairments+that+affect+a+lawyer+only+on+occasion.>Google Scholar
Texas Health and Safety Code § 12.096 (2001).Google Scholar
Texas Medical Advisory Board, Department of State Health Services EMS Certification and Licensing, “Guide for Determining Driver Limitation,” (2014) available at <http://www.txacp.org/files/Guide%20for%20Determining.pdf> (last visited May 20, 2018).+(last+visited+May+20,+2018).>Google Scholar
Texas Health and Safety Code § 12.098 (2001).Google Scholar
National Center for Health Statistics, “Health, United States, 2015: Special Feature on Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities,” (April 27, 2016).Google Scholar