Skip to main content
Log in

Informed Consent Out of Context

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several attempts have been made to transfer the concept of informed consent from medical and research ethics to dealing with affected groups in other areas such as engineering, land use planning, and business management. It is argued that these attempts are unsuccessful since the concept of informed consent is inadequate for situations in which groups of affected persons are dealt with collectively (rather than individually, as in clinical medicine). There are several reasons for this. The affected groups from which informed consent is sought cannot be identified with sufficient precision. Informed consent is associated with individual veto power, but it does not appear realistic to give veto power to all individuals who are affected for instance by an engineering project. Most importantly, the concept of informed consent puts focus on the public’s acceptance of ready-made proposals rather than on its participation in the decision-making process as a whole, which includes the development of alternatives for the decision. Therefore, the concept of informed consent is not applicable to a company’s relations with groups and collectives. It may, however, be applicable to a company’s relations with individual persons such as customers and employees.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • S. Cohen (1995) ArticleTitle‘Stakeholders and Consent’ Business and Professional Ethics Journal 14 IssueID1 3–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Condorcet: [1793] 1847, “Plan de Constitution, Presenté à la convention nationale les 15 et 16 février 1793”, Oeuvres, vol. 12, pp. 333–415.

  • M. English (1991) ArticleTitle‘Siting, Justice, and Conceptions of the Good’ Public Affairs Quarterly 5 IssueID1 1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Faden T. Beauchamp (1986) A History and Theory of Informed Consent Oxford University Press NY, OUP

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Fisher (2001) ArticleTitle‘Lessons for Business Ethics from Bioethics’ Journal of Business Ethics 34 15–24 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1011916709062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • N. Fotion (1987) ArticleTitle‘Simmons and the Concept of Consent: Commentary on Consent and Fairness in Planning Land Use’ Business and Professional Ethics Journal 6 IssueID2 21–24

    Google Scholar 

  • R. E. Freeman (1984) Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach Ballinger Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • S. M. Grunberg W. T. Cefalu (2003) ArticleTitle‘The Integral Role of Clinical Research in Clinical Care’ New England Journal of Medicine 348 1386–1388 Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJMsb025342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. O. Hansson (2003) ArticleTitle‘Ethical Criteria of Risk Acceptance’ Erkenntnis 59 291–309 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1026005915919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T. A. Long (1983) ArticleTitle‘Informed Consent and Engineering: an Essay Review’ Business and Professional Ethics Journal 3 59–66

    Google Scholar 

  • M. W. Martin R. Schinzinger (1983) Ethics in Engineering McGraw-Hill New York

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Rowan (1998) ArticleTitle‘Informed Consent as an Ethical Principle for Business’ Business and Professional Ethics Journal 17 IssueID1–2 95–111

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Schinzinger M. W. Martin (1983) ArticleTitle‘Commentary: Informed Consent in Engineering and Medicine’ Business and Professional Ethics Journal 3 67–78

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Shrader-Frechette (1993) ArticleTitle‘Consent and Nuclear Waste Disposal’ Public Affairs Quarterly 7 IssueID4 363–377

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Simmons (1987) ArticleTitle‘Consent and Fairness in Planning Land Use’ Business and Professional Ethics Journal 6 IssueID2 5–20

    Google Scholar 

  • H. J. Buren ParticleVan SuffixIII (2001) ArticleTitle‘If Fairness is the Problem, is␣Consent the Solution? Integrating ISCT and Stakeholder Theory’ Business Ethics Quarterly 11 IssueID3 481–499

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sven Ove Hansson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hansson, S.O. Informed Consent Out of Context. J Bus Ethics 63, 149–154 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-2584-z

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-2584-z

Keywords

Navigation