Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ws8qp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-27T08:23:53.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Asylum Evaluations—The Physician's Dilemma

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2002

HARVEY M. WEINSTEIN
Affiliation:
Human Rights Center and the School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley.
ERIC STOVER
Affiliation:
Human Rights Center and the School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley.

Extract

In the following paper, Annemiek Richters of the University of Leiden in the Netherlands addresses the dilemmas faced by health professionals who are asked to evaluate and provide supporting documentation for those refugees who seek political asylum in the countries of Europe. It is in the politically charged arena of asylum applications, government regulations, and public policy where bioethics, human rights, and health converge. Despite the 1951 Convention on Refugees, a treaty signed by nations around the world to safeguard the rights of those who are displaced, and other treaties that protect the rights of vulnerable populations, refugee and asylum policies have become increasingly strict in an effort to deter those who would seek safety. This tightening of borders in the countries of the West challenges physicians who find themselves caught between obligations to treat, to advocate, and to challenge policies that make treatment a potentially dangerous proposition. Unfortunately, the World Trade Center attacks have exacerbated the problem by labeling asylees and refugees as potential terrorists and subject to deportation.

Type
HEALTH AND HUMAN RIGHTS
Copyright
© 2002 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)