Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Content Analysis of Secondary Data: A Study of Courage in Managerial Decision Making

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Empirical studies in business ethics often rely on self-reported data, but this reliance is open to criticism. Responses to questionnaires and interviews may be influenced by the subject's view of what the researcher might want to hear, by a reluctance to talk about sensitive ethical issues, and by imperfect recall. This paper reviews the extent to which published research in business ethics relies on interviews and questionnaires, and then explores the possibilities of using secondary data, such as company documents and newspaper reports, as a source for empirical studies in applied ethics. A specific example is then discussed, describing the source material, the method, the development of the research questions, and the way in which reliability and validity were established. In the example, content analysis was used to examine the extent to which the executive virtue of courage was observed or called for in items published in four international daily newspapers, and to explore the meaning which was attributed to "courage" in the papers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, A. M.: 1995, ‘The New Nutrition Facts Label in the Print Media: A Content Analysis’, Journal of the American Dietetic Association 95, 349–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, M.: 1996, ‘Leadership Studies: From Procedure and Abstraction to Reflexivity and Situation’, Leadership Quarterly 7, 455–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle: [c330BC] 1953. Nicomachean Ethics, translated J. A. K. Thompson (Penguin Books, Harmondsworth).

    Google Scholar 

  • Babbie, E.: 1995, The Practice of Social Research, 7th edition (Wadsworth, Belmont CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barley, S. R., G. W. Meyer and D. C. Gash: 1988, ‘Cultures of Culture: Academics, Practitioners and the Pragmatics of Normative Control’, Administrative Science Quarterly 33, 24–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, B. L.: 1998, Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences, 3rd edition (Allyn & Bacon, Boston MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brierley, J. A. and C. J. Cowton: 2000, ‘Putting Meta-Analysis to Work: Accountants' Organizational-Professional Conflict’, Journal of Business Ethics 24, 343–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlyle, T.: [1841] 1908, On Heroes, Hero-Worship, and the Heroic in History, in Everyman's Library, Vol. 278 (JM Dent, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowton, C. J.: 1998a, ‘Research in Real Worlds: The Empirical Contribution to Business Ethics’, in C. J. Cowton and R. S. Crisp (eds.), Business Ethics: Perspectives on the Practice of Theory (Oxford University Press, Oxford), pp. 97–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowton, C. J.: 1998b, ‘The Use of Secondary Data in Business Ethics Research’, Journal of Business Ethics 17, 423–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciulla, J. B.: 1991, ‘Business Ethics as Moral Imagination’, in R. E. Freeman (ed.), Business Ethics: The State of the Art (Oxford University Press, New York), pp. 212–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, D. R. and M. B. Metzger: 1992, ‘Towards Candor, Cooperation & Privacy in Applied Business Ethics Research: The Randomized Response Technique’, Business Ethics Quarterly 2, 207–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, W. N. III., D. L. Worrell and C. I. Lee: 1994, ‘Stock Market Reactions to Announced Corporate Illegalities’, Journal of Business Ethics 13, 979–987.

    Google Scholar 

  • DePree, M.: 1997, ‘Attributes of Leaders’, Executive Excellence 14, 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, R. C. and W. D. Richardson: 1994, ‘Ethical Decision Making: A Review of the Empirical Literature’, Journal of Business Ethics 13, 205–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankfort-Nachmias, C. and D. Nachmias: 1996, Research Methods in the Social Sciences, 5th edition (Arnold, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Franzosi, R.: 1995, ‘Computer-Assisted Content Analysis of Newspapers’, Quality & Quantity 29, 157-172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagood, M. J.: 1941, Statistics for Sociologists (Reynal & Hitchcock, New York). Quoted in I.L. Janis (1965) ‘The Problem of Validating Content Analysis’, in H. D. Lasswell, N. C. Leites and Associates (eds.), Language of Politics: Studies in Quantitative Semantics (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), pp. 55–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakim, C.: 1982, Secondary Analysis in Social Research: A Guide to Data Sources and Methods with Examples (Allen & Unwin, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, H.: 1999, ‘Courage as a Management Virtue’, Business & Professional Ethics Journal 18, 27-46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty, W. H. and H. P. Sims, Jr.: 1978, ‘Some Determinants of Unethical Decision Behavior: An Experiment’, Journal of Applied Psychology 64, 451–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henningham, J.: 1996, ‘The Shape of Daily News: A Content Analysis of Australia's Metropolitan Newspapers’, Media International Australia 79, 22–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holsti, O. R.: 1969, Content Analysis for the Social Sciences (Addison Wesley, Reading, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornstein, H. A.: 1986, Managerial Courage (Wiley, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • House, R. J., W. D. Sprangler and J. Woycke: 1991, ‘Personality and Charisma in the U.S. Presidency: A Psychological Theory of Leader Effectiveness’, Administrative Science Quarterly 36, 364–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, J. M. and C. A. Higgins: 1990, ‘Champions of Technological Innovation’, Administrative Science Quarterly 35, 317–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Insch, G. S., J. E. Moore and L. D. Murphy: 1997, ‘Content Analysis in Leadership Research: Examples, Procedures, and Suggestions for Future Use’, Leadership Quarterly 8, 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamal, K. and N. E. Bowie: 1995, ‘Theoretical Considerations for a Meaningful Code of Professional Ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics 14, 703–714.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janda, K.: 1969, ‘A Microfilm and Computer System for Analyzing Comparative Politics Literature’, in G. Gerbner, O. L. Holsti, K. Krippendorf, W. J. Paisley and P. J. Stone (eds.), The Analysis of Communication Content (Wiley, New York), pp. 407–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janis, I. L.: 1965, ‘The Problem of Validating Content Analysis’, in H. D. Lasswell, N. C. Leites and Associates (eds.), Language of Politics: Studies in Quantitative Semantics (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), pp. 55–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabanoff, B., R. Waldersee and M. Cohen: 1995, ‘Espoused Values and Organizational Change Themes’, Academy of Management Journal 38, 1075–1104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, A. and J. M. Goldsen: 1965, ‘The Reliability of Content Analysis Categories’, in H. D. Lasswell, N. C. Leites and Associates (eds.), Language of Politics; Studies in Quantitative Semantics (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), pp. 83–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kouzes, J. M. and B. Z. Posner: 1995, The Leadership Challenge: How to Keep Getting Extraordinary Things Done in Organizations, 2nd edition (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, K.: 1980, Content Analysis (Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacy, S., K. Robinson and D. Riffe: 1995, ‘Sample Size in Content Analysis of Weekly Newspapers’, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 72, 336-345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, H. D., N. C. Leites and Associates (eds.): 1965, Language of Politics: Studies in Quantitative Semantics (MIT Press, Cambridge MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Meindl, J. R., S. B. Erlich and J. M. Dukerich: 1985, ‘The Romance of Leadership’, Administrative Science Quarterly 30, 78–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, A.: 1965, ‘The Feasibility of the Use of Samples in Content Analysis’, in H. D. Lasswell, N. C. Leites and Associates (eds.), Language of Politics: Studies in Quantitative Semantics (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), pp. 127–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, W. L.: 1994, Social Research Methods, 2nd edition (Allyn & Bacon, Boston, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, J. G. and K. Mercuri: 1993, ‘Private Lives, Public Officials’, American Behavioral Scientist 37, 291–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato: [c320BC] 1970, Laches, in Dialogues, Vol. 2, translated B. Jowett (Sphere Books, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, D. M. and M. F. Fernandes: 1991, ‘The Social Desirability Response Bias in Ethics Research’, Journal of Business Ethics 10, 805–817.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, D. M. and A. M. Gibson: 1990, ‘Methodology in Business Ethics Research: A Review and Critical Assessment’, Journal of Business Ethics 9, 457–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, D. C.: 1993, ‘Empiricism in Business Ethics: Suggested Research Directions’, Journal of Business Ethics 12, 585–599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarantakos, S.: 1993, Social Research (Macmillan Australia, South Melbourne).

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D.: 1993, Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. L.: 1987, Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists (Cambridge University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Teal, T.: 1996, ‘The Human Side of Management’, Harvard Business Review 74(6), 35–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treviño, L. K.: 1986, ‘Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person-Situation Interactionist Model’, Academy of Management Review 11, 601–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, D. N.: 1986, Courage: A Philosophical Investigation (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, G. R. and L. K. Treviño: 1994, ‘Normative and Empirical Business Ethics: Separation, Marriage of Convenience, or Marriage of Necessity?’, Business Ethics Quarterly 4, 129–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, J.: 1992, ‘Scenarios in Business Ethics Research: Review, Critical Assessment, and Recommendations’, Business Ethics Quarterly 2, 137–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, R. P.: 1990, Basic Content Analysis, Sage University Paper series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences 49 (Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodrum, J.: 1984, ‘“Mainstreaming” Content Analysis in Social Science: Methodology, Advantages, Obstacles and Solutions’, Social Science Research 13, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of International Business, University of South Australia, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, Australia, 5000

    Howard Harris

Authors
  1. Howard Harris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harris, H. Content Analysis of Secondary Data: A Study of Courage in Managerial Decision Making. Journal of Business Ethics 34, 191–208 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012534014727

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012534014727

Search

Navigation