Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-15T13:28:12.713Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Co-Production is Good, but Other Things are Good Too

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2023

Abstract

The world of mental health has become used to the notion of co-production as a good thing. While the paper is not a critical analysis of co-production, the authors make the case that while it is a good thing, it is not the only good thing; and it is neither sufficient, nor necessary for good things to happen in mental health services. Alternative concepts of progressive innovation in this field are introduced. Real world case studies (most of them previously unpublished) are then worked through to test which concept(s) – co-production, or the alternatives, or neither – are the better fit, bearing in mind the complex relationships to be negotiated, not just between service users and mental health professionals, but between service users and members of other professions, and of the general public. Finally, the question is raised as to whether there is anything (such as the flattening of hierarchies or stigma reduction) which all these innovations – co-production and the alternatives – have in common.

Type
Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Royal Institute of Philosophy

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Basaglia, Franco et al., L'Istituzione Negata. Rapporto da un Ospedale Psichiatrico, Baldini Castoldi Dalai (2010).Google Scholar
Baklien, Børge and Bongaardt, Rob, ‘The Quest for Choice and the Need for Relational Care in Mental Health Work’, Med Health Care Philos, 17 (2014), 625–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crepaz-Keay, David and Cyhlarova, Eva, ‘A New Self-Management Intervention for People with Severe Psychiatric Diagnoses’, The Journal of Mental Health Training, Education and Practice, 7:2 (2012), 8994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalathil, Jayasree and Jones, Nev, ‘Unsettling Disciplines: Madness, Identity, Research, Knowledge’, Philosophy, Psychiatry & Psychology, 23:3–4 (2016), 183–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NHS Mental Health Taskforce, The Five Year Forward View for Mental Health (2016), accessed 7 July 2023: https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Mental-Health-Taskforce-FYFV-final.pdf.Google Scholar
Needham, Catherine, Co-Production: An Emerging Evidence Base for Adult Social Care Transformation (London: SCIE, 2009).Google Scholar
NHS, Five Year Forward View (2014), accessed 7 July 2023: https://www.england.nhs.uk/five-year-forward-view/.Google Scholar
NHS, The NHS Long Term Plan (2019), accessed 7 July 2023: https://www.longtermplan.nhs.uk/.Google Scholar
Novak, Chloe, Packer, Emma, Paterson, Alastair, Roshi, Ambrina, Locke, Rosie, Keown, Patrick, Watson, Stuart, and Anderson, Kirstie N., ‘Feasibility and Utility of Enhanced Sleep Management on In-Patient Psychiatry Wards’, BJPsych Bulletin, 44:6 (2020), 255–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Repper, Julie and Carter, Tim, ‘A Review of the Literature on Peer Support in Mental Health Services’, Journal of Mental Health, 20:4 (2011), 392411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roelandt, J.L., Daumerie, N., Defromont, L., Caria, A., Bastow, P., and Kishore, J., ‘Community Mental Health Service: An Experience from the East Lille, France’, Journal of Mental Health and Human Behaviour, 19 (2014), 1018.Google Scholar
Voronka, Jijian, ‘The Politics of “People with Lived Experience”’, Philosophy, Psychiatry & Psychology, 23:3–4 (2016), 189201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wessely, Simon, Gilbert, Steve, Hedley, Mark, and Neuberger, Julia, Modernising the Mental Health Act – Increasing Choice, Reducing Compulsion: Final Report of the Independent Review of the Mental Health Act 1983 (London, 2018).Google Scholar