Skip to main content

Entanglement, Upper Probabilities and Decoherence in Quantum Mechanics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Computation of decay time for entangled quantum systems is an important aspect of decoherence theories. Here we explore this topic from the standpoint of computing the decay time to the existence of a joint probability distribution of the entangled particles – atoms, in our case. We also analyze the problem from the viewpoint of the decay of an improper upper probability distribution, for the entangled particles and its continuous decay into a proper probability distribution. A standard quantum decoherence model and the upper-probability model have, it turns out, the same expected decay time for a familiar example of a system with a Bell state.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Clauser JF, Horne MA, Shimony A, Holt RA (1969) Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories. Phys Rev Lett 23:880–884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann S (2009) Quantum optical master equations for Z atoms: The use of superoperator methods. Unpublished manuscript, Tilburg University

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlosshauer M (2007) Decoherence and the quantum-to-classical transition. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppes P (1961) Probabilistic concepts in quantum mechanics. Philos Sci 28(4):378–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suppes P (1974) The measurement of belief. J Roy Stat Soc Ser B 36:160–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppes P, de Barros JA (2007) Quantum mechanics and the brain. Quantum interaction: Papers from the AAAI spring symposium, Technical Report SS-07–08. AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA, pp 75–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppes P, Zanotti M (1981) When are probabilistic explanations possible? Synthese 48:191–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suppes P, Zanotti M (1989) Conditions on upper and lower probabilities to imply probabilities. Erkenntnis 31:323–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suppes P, Zanotti M (1991) Existence of hidden variables having only upper probabilities. Found Phys 21:1479–1499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walley P (1991) Statistical reasoning with imprecise probabilities. Chapman & Hall, London/ New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeh HD (1973) Toward a quantum theory of observation. Found Phys 3:109–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephan Hartmann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hartmann, S., Suppes, P. (2010). Entanglement, Upper Probabilities and Decoherence in Quantum Mechanics. In: Suárez, M., Dorato, M., Rédei, M. (eds) EPSA Philosophical Issues in the Sciences. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3252-2_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics