Abstract
Concern with material equality as the central form of distributive justice is a very modern idea. Distributive justice for Aristotle and many other writers for millennia after him was a matter of distributing what each ought to get from merit or desert in some sense. Many, such as Hume, thought material equality a pernicious idea. In the medieval village life of Bodo, villagers knew enough about each other to govern relations through norms, including, when necessary, a norm of charity. In more complex modern societies, economic destitution cannot so well be handled by individual charity, but now it can be handled by states. Hence, we begin to conceive of the idea of distributive justice as driven essentially by concern for material equality. The difference in state capacities is largely epistemological: states today can know much more about their citizens.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Banfield, E.C., The Moral Basis of a Backward Society. New York: Free Press, 1958.
Barry, B., Theories of Justice. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1989.
Edgeworth, F.Y., Mathematical Psychics: An Essay on the Application of Mathematics to the Moral Sciences. London: C. Kegan Paul, 1881.
Green, T.A., Verdict According to Conscience: Perspectives on the English Criminal Trial Jury, 1200-1800. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985.
Hardin, R., Morality within the Limits of Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988.
-, My University's Yacht: Morality and the Rule of Law, in Ian Shapiro (ed.), NOMOS 36, The Rule of Law. New York: New York University Press, 1994, pp. 205–227.
Hart, H.L.A., Between Utility and Rights, Columbia Law Review 79 (1979), pp. 828–846. (Reprinted in Hart, Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press1983, pp. 198-222.)
Hume, D., An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals, in Hume, Enquiries. Oxford: Oxford University Press [1751] 1975, pp. 167–323, ed. L. A. Selby-Bigge and P. H. Nidditch, 3rd edition.
-, A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, [1739-40] 1978, ed. L.A. Selby-Bigge and P.H. Nidditch, 2nd edition.
Leijonhufvud, A., The Individual, the Market and the Industrial Division of Labor, in Carlo Mongardini (ed.), L'Individuo e il mercato. Rome: Bulzoi, 1995, pp. 61–78.
Nozick, R., Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books, 1974.
Okun, A.M., Equality and Efficiency: The Big Tradeoff. Washington: Brookings Institution, 1975.
Rawls, J., A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971.
-, The Law of Peoples, in Stephen Shute and Susan Hurley (eds.), On Human Rights: The Oxford Amnesty Lectures 1993. New York: Basic Books, 1993.
-, Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press, [1993] 1996.
Schneewind, J.B., The Misfortunes of Virtue, Ethics 101 (1990), pp. 42–63.
Townsend, J., A Dissertation on the Poor Laws, By a Well-Wisher to Mankind. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, [1786] 1971.
Winstanley, G., The Law of Freedom in a Platform or, True Magistracy Restored. New York: Schocken Books, [1652] 1973, ed. R.W. Kenny.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hardin, R. From Bodo Ethics to Distributive Justice. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 2, 399–413 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009988031329
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009988031329