Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Making Visible the Invisible Act of Doping

  • Published:
International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes the construction of the visual space of surveillance by the global anti-doping apparatus, it is a space inhabited daily by professional cyclists. Two principal mechanisms of this apparatus will be discussed—the Whereabouts System and the Biological Passport; in order to illustrate how this space is constructed and how it visualises the invisible act of doping. These mechanisms act to supervise and govern the professional cyclist and work to classify them as either clean or dirty in terms of the use of prohibited doping substances or methods. Contrary to the analysis of liberal anti-doping scholars such as Hanstad, Loland and Møller this paper argues that Foucault’s Panopticon paradigm is a useful tool for the analysis of this apparatus. The Whereabouts System and Biological Passport are the instruments by which the anti-doping apparatus intensifies the construction of the space of surveillance in professional sport. This space of surveillance not only locates and makes visible the physical location of each individual cyclist, but it also makes visible their internal bodily functions, in this case the composition and the fluctuations of the composition of their blood. In making the cyclist visible the instruments do not allow the cause of doping, or the event of doping to be known or observed. Rather what they do is cast the body in terms of abnormalities of time, place or blood. In the case of an abnormality of the cyclist’s blood, the cause itself cannot be identified with any certainty, all that is made visible is a suggestion, or a probability, that doping may have occurred. The ultimate effects are twofold—an internalisation and continual monitoring of one’s self as well as by the authorities, and a radical change in the nature and the definition of the offence of doping. No longer is it positive evidence of doping that is punishable, but what becomes punishable is an abnormality, in the cyclist’s location, or their body, which suggests a probability that the invisible act of doping may have occurred. In the course of this process accepted manners of proving an offence by the use of scientific evidence and expert commentary are transformed. The Whereabouts System and the Biological Passport open up a new manner in which the invisible can be visualised. Through the discourse and the attendant commentary of the expert a new alliance between doping and the law is constructed. The result is a redistribution of the way in which the law visualises and treats the symptoms (the signifier) and the signified act of doping. The Whereabouts System and Biological Passport are the instruments by which the anti-doping apparatus intensifies the construction of the space of surveillance in professional sport. This space of surveillance not only locates and makes visible the physical location of each individual cyclist, but it also makes visible their internal bodily functions, in this case the composition and the fluctuations of the composition of their blood. In making the cyclist visible the instruments do not allow the cause of doping, or the event of doping to be known or observed. Rather what they do is cast the body in terms of abnormalities of time, place or blood. In the case of an abnormality of the cyclists’s blood, the cause itself cannot be identified with any certainty, all that is made visible is a suggestion, or a probability, that doping may have occurred. The ultimate effects are twofold—an internalisation and continual monitoring of one’s self as well as by the authorities, and a radical change in the nature and the definition of the offence of doping. No longer is it positive evidence of doping that is punishable, but what becomes punishable is an abnormality, in the cyclist’s location, or their body, which suggests a probability that the invisible act of doping may have occurred. In the course of this process accepted manners of proving an offence by the use of scientific evidence and expert commentary are transformed. The Whereabouts System and the Biological Passport open up a new manner in which the invisible can be visualised. Through the discourse and the attendant commentary of the expert a new alliance between doping and the law is constructed. The result is a redistribution of the way in which the law visualises and treats the symptoms (the signifier) and the signified act of doping

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agamben, G. 1998. Homo Sacer sovereign power and bare life. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Agamben, G. 2002. Remnants of Auschwitz, the witness and the archive. New York: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Agamben, G. 2002b. What is a paradigm? Lecture at European Graduate School. August 2002. http://www.egs.edu/faculty/giorgio-agamben/articles/what-is-a-paradigm/ Accessed 31 Dec 2012.

  4. Agamben, G. 2009. The signature of all things, on method. New York: Zone Books.

  5. Agamben, G. 2011. The kingdom and the glory, for a theological genealogy of economy and government. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Andrews, D. 1993. Desperately seeking Michel: Foucault’s genealogy, the body, and critical sport sociology. Sociology of Sport Journal 10(2): 148.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bauman, Z. 1989. Modernity and the Holocaust. Ithaca, NewYork: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Berman, P. 2005. From international law to law and globalization. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 43: 485.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Boardley, I.D., and M. Kavussanu. 2008. The moral disengagement in sport scale-short. Journal of Sports Sciences 26(14): 1507–1517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Briginshaw v Briginshaw. 1938. 60 CLR 336.

  11. Brissoneau, C. 2010. Doping in France (1960–2000): American and Eastern bloc influences. Journal of Physical Education and Sport 27(2): P33.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Coleman, J.E., and J.M. Levine. 2011. The burden of proof in endongenous substance cases: A masking agent for junkscience. In Doping and anti-doping policy in sport: Ethical and legal perspectives, ed. M. McNamee, and V. Møller. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cyclingnews, Benson, D. 2009. Exclusive: Anne Gripper breaks silence on blood passport, Cyclingnews. http://www.cyclingnews.com/features/exclusive-anne-gripper-breaks-silence-on-blood-passport. Last Accessed 31 Dec 2012.

  14. Debord, G. 1995. The society of the spectacle. New York: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Deleuze, Gilles. 1992. “Postscript on the societies of control”, October 59, winter 1992, 3–7. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Deleuze, Gilles. 1998. Having an idea in cinema (trans: Kaufman, E., Deleuze, G.). In New mappings in politics, philosophy and culture, eds. E. Kaufman and K. J. Heller. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

  17. Dicey, A.V. 1920. Introduction to the study of the law of the constitution. London: MacMillan and Co Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dimeo, P. 2007. A history of drug use in sport, 1876–1976, beyond good and evil. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  19. El Mundo. 2011. Cronología del ‘caso Alberto Contador’. El Mundo Newspaper, http://www.elmundo.es/elmundodeporte/2011/02/15/ciclismo/1297794357.html. Accessed 31 Dec 2012.

  20. Faber, N., and B. Vandeginste. 2010. Flawed science ‘legalized’ in the fight against doping: The example of the biological passport. March: Accred Qual Assur.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Foucault, M. 1978. The will to knowledge, the history of sexuality: 1. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Foucault, M. 1991. Discipline and punishment, the birth of the prison. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Foucault, M. 2008. The birth of biopolitics, lectures at the College of France, 1978–1979. Hampshire: Palgrave Macillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Hacking, I. 1990. The taming of chance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hanstad, Dag Vidar and Loland, Sigmand. 2009. Elite Athletes’ duty to provide information on their whereabouts: Justifiable anti-doping work or an indefensible surveillance regime? European Journal of Sport Science 9(1): 3–10.

  26. Hardie, M. 2011. It’s not about the blood, Operacion Puerto and the end of Modernity. In Doping and anti-doping policy in sport: Ethical and legal perspectives, eds. McNamee, M. and Møller, V. Abingdon: Routledge. Originally published as No va sobre la sangre, Operación Puerto y el fin de la modernidad, NÓMADAS Revista Crítica de Ciencias Sociales y Jurídicas/Critical Review of Social and Juridical Sciences. 25, Enero-Junio. 2010 (I), Universidad de Compultense, Madrid, Spain.

  27. Hardie, M., D. Shilbury, C. Bozzi, and I. Ware. 2012. I wish I was twenty one now, beyond doping in the Australian Peloton. Geelong: Auskadi Samizdats.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hardt, M., and A. Negri. 1999. Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hardt, M., and A. Negri. 2009. Commonwealth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hoberman, J. 1992. Mortal engines: The science of performance and the dehumanization of sport. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Horstman, D.H., M. Gleser, D. Wolfe, T. Tryon, and J. Delehunt. 1974. Effects of hemoglobin reduction on VO2 max and related hemodynamics in exercising dogs. Journal of Applied Physiology 37(1): 97.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Horstman, D.H., M. Gleser, and J. Delehunt. 1976. Effects of altering O2 delivery on VO2 of isolated, working muscle. American Journal of Physiology 230(2): 327.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Houlihan, B. 1999. Dying to win: Doping in sport and the development of anti-doping. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kreft, L. 2009. The elite athlete: In a state of exception? Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 3(1): 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Landaluze. 2006. UCI v L and RFEC. CAS 2006/A/1119 19 Dec 2006.

  36. Lazzarato, M. 2004. From capital-labour to capital-life. Ephemera 4(3): 187.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Long, T., N. Pantaléon, G. Bruant, and F. d’Arripe-Longueville. 2006. A qualitative study of moral reasoning of young elite athletes. The Sport Psychologist 20: 330.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Lucidi, F., A. Zelli, L. Mallia, C. Grano, P. Russo, and C. Violani. 2008. The social-cognitive mechanisms regulating adolescents’ use of doping substances. Journal of Sports Sciences 26(5): 447–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Marazzi, C. 2011. Capital and affects, the politics of the language economy. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).

    Google Scholar 

  40. McLaren, R.H. 2006. CAS doping jurisprudence: What can we learn? 1 International Sports Law Review (1): 4.

  41. Møller, V. 2011. One step too far—About WADA’s whereabouts rule. International Journal of Sport, Policy and Politics 3(2): 177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Møller, V. 2011. The Scapegoat, about the expulsion of Michael Rasmussen from the 2007 Tour de France and beyond. Aarhus: Akaprint.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Neocleous, M. 2000. Fabrication of social order: A critical theory of police power. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Perth Now. 2011. http://www.perthnow.com.au/news/western-australia/dole-drug-tests-homeswest-reform-proposed-at-wa-liberal-conference/story-e6frg13u-1226447842448.

  45. Redmayne, M. 1996. Presenting probabilities in court: The DNA experience, 1996–1997. The International Journal of Evidence and Proof 1: 187.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Read, J. 2003. The micro-politics of capital, marx and the prehistory of the present. New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Soek, J. 2006. The strict liability principle and the human rights of athletes in doping cases. The Hague: Asser Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  48. Sottas, P.E., N. Robinson, and M. Saugy. 2010. The athlete’s biological passport and indirect markers of blood doping, doping in sports: Biochemical principles, effects and analysis. Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology 195: 305–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Straubel, M.S. 2009. Lessons from USADA v. Jenkins: You can’t win when you beat a monopoly. Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal 10(1): 119.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Thatcher, M. 1981. Interview for the Sunday Times—The first two years. The Sunday Times. http://www.margaretthatcher.org/document/104475. Accessed 31 Dec 2012.

  51. Turner, B.S. 1984. The body and society. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  52. UCI. Anti-Doping Rules of the UCI—Part 14 of the UCI Regulations http://www.uci.ch/includes/asp/getTarget.asp?type=FILE&id=NDc3MDk. Accessed 18 Feb 2013.

  53. UCI (2007). Information on the biological passport http://www.uci.ch/Modules/ENews/ENewsDetails.asp?MenuId=&id=NTQzOA&LangId=1. Accessed 31 Dec.

  54. UCI (2008). Whereabouts & location forms http://www.uci.ch/templates/UCI/UCI2/layout.asp?MenuId=MTI1Njk. Accessed 31 Dec 2012.

  55. Waddington, I. 2010. Surveillance and control in sport: A sociologist looks at the WADA whereabouts system. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics 2(3): 255–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. WADC. World Anti-Doping Code. http://www.wada-ama.org/en/world-anti-doping-program/sports-and-anti-doping-organizations/the-code/. Accessed 31 Dec 2012.

  57. WADA International Standards. http://www.wada-ama.org/en/World-Anti-Doping-Program/Sports-and-Anti-Doping-Organizations/International-Standards/. Accessed 31 Dec 2012.

  58. XZTT and Anti-Doping Rule Violation Panel. (2012). AATA 728. http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/AATA/2012/728.html. Accessed 31 Dec 2012.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Law, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia

    Martin Hardie

Authors
  1. Martin Hardie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Hardie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hardie, M. Making Visible the Invisible Act of Doping. Int J Semiot Law 27, 85–119 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-013-9311-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-013-9311-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation