Abstract.
Part C of this three part series is the presentation from the Oxford style debate held at the Tenth Annual International Conference Promoting Business Ethics between Laura Hartman, J.D., and Dr. Moses Pava on topics related to the EverQuest® v. EverCrack case (Part B). In a traditional Oxford style debate, two debaters take opposing viewpoints and the third debater argues the neutral position. At the Conference, the modified format featured the two debaters presenting diametrically opposing views – corporate responsibility versus personal responsibility. This modified format was also used during the Ethics Awareness Week (Part A), with University professors presenting the debate before the student body. Ms. Hartman’s position focused on the personal responsibility by Mr Woolley while Dr. Pava opined that Sony Online Entertainment had corporate responsibility toward Mr. Woolley and all other individuals similarly situated.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
‘Addicted to the Tube’.: 2002, February 1. CBSNews.com. Retrieved from http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/02/01/uttm/printable 327869.shtml.
American Amusement Machine Ass’n v. Kendrick, 244 F.2nd 575 (7th Cir. 2001), cert. den., 122 S.Ct. 462 (2001) (reversing the federal district court and enjoining a city ordinance aimed at preventing children from playing video games perceived as violent).
Brandenberg v. (1969). Ohio, 395 U.S. 444.
Coleman D. (1990). October 16. ‘How Viewers Get Addicted to Television’, New York Times.
Compendium of ICC Rules on Children and Young People and Marketing, (2003, April 19). International Chamber of Commerce, Commission on Marketing and Advertising Retrieved from http://www.iccwbo. org/home/statements_rules/rules/2003.
DeFilippo v. National Broadcasting Co., Inc., 446 A.2d 1036 (R.I. 1982).
Henderson, P. (Producer).: 2002, October 18. Addicted [Television series episode], in 48 Hours. CBS Broadcasting Company.
G. Keighley (2002) ArticleTitleAugust. ’The Sorcerer of Sony’ Business 20 49–53
Miller, S.: 2002, March 30. ‘Death of a game addict’, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. Retrieved May 1, 2003 from http://www.sjoline/com/new/State/mar02/31536.asp.
Olivia v. National Broadcasting Co., Inc., 178 Cal.Rptr. 888 (1981).
Patrizio, A.: 2002, April 3. ‘Did Game Play Role in Suicide?’ Wired News. Retrieved May 1, 2003 from http://www.wired.com/news/games/0,2101,51490,00.html.
Pearce, C.: 2002. ‘Addictive Technologies’, in M.A. Mose (ed.), Flesh Eating Technologies.
Stasiof v. Chicago Hoist and Body Co., 200 N.E.2d 88,99 (1st Dist. 1964). (‘the act of suicide is viewed as an independent intervening act which the original tortfeasor could not have reasonably been expected to foresee’).
Walt Disney Productions, Inc. v. Shannon, 276 S.E.2d 580 (Ga. 1981).
Watters v. TSR, Inc., 904 F.2d 378 (1990).
Yee, N.: 2001. ‘The Norrahian Scrolls: A Study of EverQuest®’, Retrieved May 1, 2003 from http://www.nickyee.com/eqt/report.html.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hartman, L.P., Pava, M.L. Sony Online Entertainment: EverQuest® or EverCrack? Oxford Style Debate Presented at Tenth Annual International Conference Promoting Business Ethics. J Bus Ethics 58, 17–26 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-1379-6
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-1379-6