Skip to main content
Log in

Should we presume moral turpitude in our children? – Small children and consent to medical research

  • Published:
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When children are too young to make their ownautonomous decisions, decisions have to be madefor them. In certain contexts we allow parentsand others to make these decisions, and do notinterfere unless the decision clearly violatesthe best interest of the child. In othercontexts we put a priori limits on whatkind of decisions parents can make, and/or whatkinds of considerations they have to take intoaccount. Consent to medical research currentlyfalls into the second group mentioned here. Wewant to consider and ultimately reject one ofthe arguments put forward for putting medicalresearch into the second category. We willargue that some objections to children'sparticipation in research are either based onan implausibly restrictive conception of whatis in fact in the child's best interests orthat there is an implicit and false premisehidden in this argument; i.e., the premise thatour children have so deeply fallen into moralturpitude that we must assume that they wouldnot want to fulfill their moral obligations,or, that they will grow up to be morallydeficient and will then wish not to have actedwell while a child.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Buchanan, A.E., Brock, D.W. Deciding for Others: The Ethics of Surrogate Decision Making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. “Consent and End of Life Decisions.” The Journal of Medical Ethics 2003, in press.

  • Harris, J. “Ethical Genetic Research.” Jurimetrics: The Journal of Law, Science, and Policy 40 (1999): 77–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. “Research on Human Subjects, Exploitation and Global Principles of Ethics.” In: Lewis, A.D.E., Freeman, M., eds. Law and Medicine: Current Legal Issues. Oxford University Press, 2000, pp. 379–399.

  • Hart, H.L.A. “Are There any Natural Rights?” The Philosophical Review 64 (1955): 175–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holm, S. “Autonomy, Authenticity, or Best Interest: Everyday Decision-making and Persons with Dementia.” Medicine Health Care and Philosophy 4 (2001): 153–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holm, S. “Conducting Research in the Alzheimer Population: Balancing Individual, Group, Family and Societal Interests.” In: Purtillo, R., ten Have H., eds. Ethical Foundations for Palliative Care Approaches in Alzheimer's Disease. Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonas, H. “Philosophical Reflections on Experimenting with Human Subjects.” In: Freund, P. A., ed. Experimentation with Human Subjects. London: Allen and Unwin, 1972, pp. 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurtines, W.M., Gewirtz, J.L. Handbook of Moral Behavior and Development, 3 vols. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R. Anarchy, State and Utopia. Oxford: Blackwell, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, P. “Children as Research Subjects: A Reply.” Hastings Center Report 7 (1977): 40–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, P. “The Enforcement of Morals: Non-therapeutic Research on Children.” Hastings Center Report 6 (1976): 21–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, P. The Patient as Person. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, L.F. Children, Families and Health Care Decision Making. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Medical Association (W.M.A.). Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. As adopted by the 18th W.M.A., Helsinki, Finland, 1964. The declaration has been amended multiple times: by the 29th W.M.A., Tokyo, Japan, 1975, the 35th W.M.A., Venice, Italy, 1983, the 41st W.M.A., Hong Kong, China, 1989, the 48th W.M.A. Somerset West, Republic of South Africa, 1996, the 52nd W.M.A., Edinburgh, Scotland, 2000. Note of Clarification on Paragraph 29 added by the WMA General Assembly, Washington 2002. Can be found on the web at: <http://www.wma.net/e/policy/17cnote.pdf>.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harris, J., Holm, S. Should we presume moral turpitude in our children? – Small children and consent to medical research. Theor Med Bioeth 24, 121–129 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024651013837

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024651013837

Navigation