Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Trust, inequality and the market

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article examines, experimentally, whether inequality affects the social capital of trust in non-market and market settings. We consider three experimental treatments, one with equality, one with inequality but no knowledge of the income of other agents, and one with inequality and knowledge. Inequality, particularly when it is known, has a corrosive effect on trusting behaviours in this experiment. Agents appear to be less sensitive to known relative income differentials in markets than they are in the non-market settings, but trust in markets appears generally more vulnerable to the introduction of inequality than in the non-market setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alesina A., La Ferrara E. (2002) Who trusts others?. Journal of Public Economics 85: 207–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson L., Mellor J., Milyo J. (2006) Induced heterogeneity in trust experiments. Experimental Economics 9: 223–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball S., Eckel C., Grossman P., Zame W. (2001) Status in markets. Quarterly Journal of Economics 16: 161–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker G. S. (1971) The economics of discrimination. Chicago University Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg J., Dickaut J., McCabe K. (1995) Trust, reciprocity and social history. Games and Economic Behaviour 10: 122–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beugelsdijk S., deGroot H., van Schaik A. (2004) Trust and economic growth: Robustness analysis. Oxford Economic Papers 56: 118–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camerer C. (2003) Behavioural game theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk A., Fischbacher U. (2001) Distributional consequences and intentions in a model of reciprocity. Annales d’Economie et de Statistique 63-64: 39–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr E., Kirchsteiger G., Riedl A. (1993) Does fairness prevent market clearing? An experimental investigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics 108: 437–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr E., Schmidt K. (1999) A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Economics 114: 817–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folbre N., Nelson J. (2000) For Love or money—Or both?. Journal of Economic Perspectives 14: 123–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser E., Laibson D., Scheinkman J., Soutter C. (2000) Measuring trust. Quarterly Journal of Economics 115: 811–846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guala F. (2005) The methodology of experimental economics. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Guerra G., Zizzo D. J. (2004) Trust responsiveness and beliefs. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization 55: 25–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves Heap S., Zizzo D. J. (2009) The value of groups. American Economic Review 99: 295–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch F. (1977) The social limits to growth. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman A. (1982) Rival interpretations of market society: Civilizing, destructive, or feeble?. Journal of Economic Literature 20: 1463–1484

    Google Scholar 

  • Knack S., Keefer P. (1997) Does social capital have and economic pay-off? Cross-country investigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics 112: 1251–1288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane R. (1991) The market experience. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lei V., Vesely F. (2010) In-group versus out-group trust: The impact of income inequality. Southern Economic Journal 76: 1049–1063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macours K. (2011) Increasing inequality and civil conflict in Nepal. Oxford Economic Papers 63: 1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam R., Leonardi R., Nanetti R.Y. (1993) Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabe-Hesketh, S., Skrondal, A., & Pickles, A. (2004). GLLAMM Manual. U.C. Berkeley Division of Biostatistics Working Paper 160, Berkeley.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel John Zizzo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hargreaves Heap, S.P., Tan, J.H.W. & Zizzo, D.J. Trust, inequality and the market. Theory Decis 74, 311–333 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-011-9287-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-011-9287-y

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation