Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Relationship Between Declarations of Conflict of Interests and Reporting Positive Outcomes in Iranian Dental Journals

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Conflict of interests is a situation when someone is in need of other people’s trust on one the hand and has personal or general interests on the other hand, resulting in conflict with the given responsibility. In this research work, an attempt was made to find the relation between declarations of conflict of interests and reporting positive outcomes in the dental journals in Iran (2000–2016). In this analytical/cross-sectional study, first Health and Biomedical Information was searched and all the Persian and English dental journals published in Iran were collected. Then, all the papers published in the journals from December 2000 to December 2016 were collected and categorized in terms of the year of publication, author or authors’ affiliations, Persian and English journal, type of the substance or the drug used (including the manufacturing company), declarations of conflict of interests and the positive or negative conclusion of the report. Data were analyzed with the Fisher’s exact test and Chi squared test, using the program SPSS 18. In numerical analysis, the significance was set at P < 0.05. Seventeen dental journals in Persian and English were analyzed: 10 in English and 7 in Persian. Reviewing these studies showed that of 1021 articles in Persian, in 128 cases there was no mention of a declaration of conflict of interests and in 11 cases, the COI had been stated. In addition, from 1220 articles in English, in 825 cases there was no mention of declarations of conflict of interests and in 45 cases, the declarations of COI had been mentioned. There was no significant relation between the COI and ‘no’ COI and the reporting of positive outcomes in papers in Iranian dental journals in terms of the journal type, year of publication and the journals’ guarantee form (P = 0.25, P = 0.41 and P = 0.09). A total of 83% of studies with declarations of COI had one positive outcome, with a significant relationship in this field; however, in 73% of studies with no COI, there was one positive outcome, too. In general, the society expects that doctors would not consider any incentives except the health of the patients in the efforts made by them. The severity of the consequences of COI is of higher value when the patients’ health is endangered due to it. In addition, COI might change the attitude and approach of other doctors and peers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ancker, J. S., & Flanagin, A. (2007). A comparison of conflict of interest policies at peer-reviewed journals in different scientific disciplines. Science and Engineering Ethics, 13, 147–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baethge, C. (2008). Transparent texts. Deutsches Arzteblatt International, 105, 675–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baethge, C. (2013). Production and recognition of psychiatric original articles published in languages other than english. BMC Psychiatry, 13, 102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, D. E., & Bero, L. A. (1997). Scientific quality of original research articles on environmental tobacco smoke. Tobacco Control, 6, 19–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, D. E., & Bero, L. A. (1998). Why review articles on the health effects of passive smoking reach different conclusions. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 279, 1566–1570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bekelman, J. E., Li, Y., & Gross, C. P. (2003). Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: A systematic review. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 289, 454–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bes-Rastrollo, M., Schulze, M. B., Ruiz-Canela, M., & Martinez-Gonzalez, M. A. (2013). Financial conflicts of interest and reporting bias regarding the association between sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain: A systematic review of systematic reviews. PLoS Medicine, 10, e1001578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brignardello-Petersen, R., Carrasco-Labra, A., Yanine, N., Ulloa, C., Araya, I., et al. (2013). Positive association between conflicts of interest and reporting of positive results in randomized clinical trials in dentistry. Journal of the American Dental Association, 144, 1165–1170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cain, D. M., Loewenstein, G., & Moore, D. A. (2005). The dirt on coming clean: Possible effects of disclosing conflicts of interest. The Journal of Legal Studies, 34, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chimonas, S., Frosch, Z., & Rothman, D. J. (2011). From disclosure to transparency: The use of company payment data. Archives of Internal Medicine, 171, 81–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, M. K., & Bero, L. A. (1996). The quality of drug studies published in symposium proceedings. Annals of Internal Medicine, 124, 485–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, T. J., Barrowman, N. J., & Moher, D. (2002). Funding source, trial outcome and reporting quality: Are they related? Results of a pilot study. BioMed Central Health Services Research, 2, 18.

  • Davidson, R. A. (1986). Source of funding and outcome of clinical trials. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 1, 155–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djulbegovic, B., Lacevic, M., Cantor, A., Fields, K. K., Bennett, C. L., Adams, J. R., et al. (2000). The uncertainty principle and industry- sponsored research. Lancet, 356, 635–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drazen, J. M., de Leeuw, P. W., Laine, C., Mulrow, C. D., De Angelis, C. D., Frizelle, F. A., et al. (2007). Toward more uniform conflict disclosures: The updated ICMJE conflict of interest reporting form. Annals of Internal Medicine, 153, 268–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drazen, J. M., de Leeuw, P. W., Laine, C., Mulrow, C. D., DeAngelis, C. D., Frizelle, F. A., et al. (2010). Toward more uniform conflict disclosures: The updated ICMJE conflict of interest reporting form. Annals of Internal Medicine, 153, 268–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, M. (2015). Two-thirds of studies on ‘psychosocial’ treatments fail to declare conflicts of interest. Available in http://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/two-thirds-of-studies-on-psychosocial-treatments-fail-to-declare-conflicts-of-interest. Accessed November 26, 2015.

  • Eisner, M., Humphreys, D. K., Wilson, P., & Gardner, F. (2015). Disclosure of financial conflicts of interests in interventions to improve child psychosocial health: A cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE, 10, e0142803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Every-Palmer, S., & Howick, J. (2014). How evidence-based medicine is failing due to biased trials and selective publication. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 20, 908–914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedberg, M., Saffran, B., & Stinson, T. J. (1999). Evaluation of conflict of interest in economic analyses of new drugs used in oncology. JAMA, 282, 1453–1457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann, L. S., & Richter, E. D. (2004). Relationship between conflicts of interest and research results. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 19, 51–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, D. M. (2016). Can we trust positive findings of intervention research? The role of conflict of interest. Prevention science, 3, 1–11.

  • Hakoum, M. B., Jouni, N., Abou-Jaoude, E. A., Hasbani, D. J., Abou-Jaoude, E. A., Lopes, L. C., et al. (2017). Authors of clinical trials reported individual and financial conflicts of interest more frequently than institutional and nonfinancial ones: A methodological survey. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, S0895–4356, 30618-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICMJE. (2010). ICMJE form for disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. Available at http://www.icmje.org/coidisclosure.pdf. Accessed June 17, 2013.

  • Juni, P., Holenstein, F., Sterne, J., Bartlett, C., & Egger, M. (2002). Direction and impact of language bias in meta-analyses of controlled trials: Empirical study. International Journal of Epidemiology, 31, 115–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kesselheim, A. S., Wang, B., Studdert, D. M., & Avorn, J. (2012a). Conflict of interest reporting by authors involved in promotion of off-label drug use: An analysis of journal disclosures. PLoS ONE, 9, e1001280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kesselheim, A. S., Wang, B., Studdert, D. M., & Avorn, J. (2012b). Conflict of interest reporting by authors involved in promotion of off-label drug use: An analysis of journal disclosures. PLoS Medicine, 9, 100–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kjaergard, L. L., & Als-Nieslen, B. (2002). Association between competing interests and authors’ conclusions: Epidemiological study of randomized clinical trials published in the BMJ. BMJ, 325, 249–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kjaergard, L. L., Nikolova, D., & Gluud, C. (1999). Randomized clinical trials in hepatology: Predictors of quality. Hepatology, 30, 1134–1138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lexchin, J., Bero, L. A., Djulbegovic, B., & Clark, O. (2003). Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: Systematic review. British Medical Journal, 326, 1167–1170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieb, K., Klemperer, D., Koch, K., Baethge, C., Ollenschläger, G., & Ludwig, W. D. (2011). Mit Transparenz Vertrauen särken. Deutsches Ärzteblatt, 108, 256–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, R., & Rogers, W. (2015). Potential conflict of interest and bias in the RACGP’s smoking cessation guidelines: Are GPs provided with the best advice on smoking cessation for their patients? Public Health Ethics, 8, 319–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansorian, Y. (2012). Critical consideration of ethics in scientific publication book. Ketab-Mah-Koliat J, 15, 48–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nosek, B. A., Spies, J. R., & Motyl, M. (2012). Scientific utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 615–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okike, K., Kocher, M. S., Wei, E. X., Mehlman, C. T., & Bhandari, M. (2009). Accuracy of conflict-of-interest disclosures reported by physicians. The New England Journal of Medicine, 361, 1466–1474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panagiotou, O. A., & Ioannidis, J. P. (2012). Primary study authors of significant studies are more likely to believe that a strong association exists in a heterogeneous meta-analysis compared with methodologists. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 65, 740–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pang, W. K., Yeter, K. C., Torralba, K. D., Spencer, H. J., & Khan, N. A. (2015). Financial conflicts of interest and their association with outcome and quality of fibromyalgia drug therapy randomized controlled trials. International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases, 18, 606–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papageorgiou, S. N., Kloukos, D., Petridis, H., & Pandis, N. (2015). Publication of statistically significant research findings in prosthodontics & implant dentistry in the context of other dental specialties. Journal of Dentistry, 43, 1195–1202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piper, B. J., Telku, H. M., & Lambert, D. A. (2015). A quantitative analysis of undisclosed conflicts of interest in pharmacology textbooks. PLoS ONE, 10, e0133261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rezaeian, M. (2011). The management of reviewing, publishing and dissemination of health articles. Health Information Management, 8, 412–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochon, P. A., Gurwitz, J. H., Simms, R. W., Fortin, P. R., Felson, D. T., Minaker, K. L., et al. (1994). A Study of manufacturer-supported trials of Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the treatment of arthritis. Archives of Internal Medicine, 154, 157–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruff, K. (2015). Scientific journals and conflict of interest disclosure: What progress has been made? Environmental Health, 30(14), 45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schott, G., Pachl, H., Limbach, U., Gundert-Remy, U., Lieb, K., & Ludwig, W. D. (2010a). The financing of drug trials by pharmaceutical companies and its consequences: Part 2: A qualitative, systematic review of the literature on possible influences on authorship, access to trial data, and trial registration and publication. Deutsches Arzteblatt International, 107, 295–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schott, G., Pachl, H., Limbach, U., Gundert-Remy, U., Ludwig, W. D., & Lieb, K. (2010b). The financing of drug trials by pharmaceutical companies and its consequences. Part 1: A qualitative, systematic review of the literature on possible influences on the findings, protocols, and quality of drug trials. Deutsches Arzteblatt International, 107, 279–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, B., Banting, D., & Stitt, L. (2007). Perceptions about conflicts of interest: An Ontario survey of dentists’ opinions. Journal of Dental Education, 71, 1540–1548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaebani, A. (2007). Ethics in scientific articles. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology, 13, 78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stelfox, H. A. T., Chua, G., O’Rourke, K., & Detsky, A. S. (1998). Conflict of interest in the debate over calcium-channel antagonists. The New England Journal of Medicine, 338, 101–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tammy, J., & Nicholas, J. (2002). DavidM. Funding source, trial outcome and reporting quality: Are they related? Results of a pilot study. BMC Health Services Research, 2, 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, D. F. (1993). Understanding financial conflicts of interest. New England Journal of Medicine, 329, 573–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Association of Medical Editors. (2015). Conflict of interest in peer-reviewed medical journals. http://www.wame.org/about/conflict-of-interest-in-peerreviewed-medical. Accessed January 15, 2015.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to appreciate the continued support of the Research Council of Kerman University of Medical Sciences.

Funding

This study was self-funded.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Kerman Oral and Dental Diseases Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

    Maryam Alsadat Hashemipour & Nader Navabi

  2. Department of Oral Medicine, Dental School, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

    Maryam Alsadat Hashemipour & Nader Navabi

  3. Dental School, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

    Sepehr Pourmonajemzadeh & Shahrzad Zoghitavana

Authors
  1. Maryam Alsadat Hashemipour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sepehr Pourmonajemzadeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shahrzad Zoghitavana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nader Navabi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maryam Alsadat Hashemipour.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no competing interests to declare with regards to authorship and/or publication of this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hashemipour, M.A., Pourmonajemzadeh, S., Zoghitavana, S. et al. Relationship Between Declarations of Conflict of Interests and Reporting Positive Outcomes in Iranian Dental Journals. Sci Eng Ethics 25, 1057–1067 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-018-0022-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-018-0022-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation