Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ordinary Devices: Reply to Bringsjord's `Clarifying the Logic of Anti-Computationalism: Reply to Hauser'1

  • Published:
Minds and Machines Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bringsjord, S. 1992 What Robots Can and Can't Be. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bringsjord, S. 1994 ‘Précis of What Robots Can and Can't Be’, Psycholoquy 5.59 [http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/cgi/psyc/newpsy?].

  • Hauser, L. 1997 ‘Review of Selmer Bringsjord's What Robots Can abd Cannot Be,’ Minds and Machines 7, 433-438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, J. 1995 ‘Creating Computer Persons: More Likely Irrational than Impossible: Book Review of Bringsjord on robot-Consciousness’, Psycoloquy 6.14: Article 9 [http://cogsci.ecs.soton.ac.uk/cgi-bin/newpsy?robot-consciousness.9].

Download references

Authors
  1. Larry Hauser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hauser, L. Ordinary Devices: Reply to Bringsjord's `Clarifying the Logic of Anti-Computationalism: Reply to Hauser'1. Minds and Machines 10, 115–117 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008317632092

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008317632092

Keywords

Search

Navigation