Abstract
Hermeneutics is useful in science and science education by emphasizing the process of understanding. The purpose of this study was to construct a workshop based upon hermeneutical principles and to interpret students’ learning in the workshop through a hermeneutical perspective. When considering the history of Newtonian mechanics, it could be considered that there are two methods of approaching Newtonian mechanics. One method is called the ‘prediction approach’, and the other is called the ‘explanation approach’. The ‘prediction approach’ refers to the application of the principles of Newtonian mechanics. We commonly use the prediction approach because its logical process is natural to us. However, its use is correct only when a force, such as gravitation, is exactly known. On the other hand, the ‘explanation approach’ could be used when the nature of a force is not exactly known. In the workshop, students read a short text offering contradicting ideas about whether to analyze a friction situation using the explanation approach or the prediction approach. Twenty-two college students taking an upper-level mechanics course wrote their ideas about the text. The participants then discussed their ideas within six groups, each composed of three or four students. Through the group discussion, students were able to clarify their preconceptions about friction, and they responded to the group discussion positively. Students started to think about their learning from a holistic perspective. As students thought and discussed the friction problems in the manner of hermeneutical circles, they moved toward a better understanding of friction.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arons, A. B. (1997). Teaching introductory physics. New York: Wiley.
Bernsen, N. O. (1986). Beyond objectivism and relativism. Science, hermeneutics, and praxis. Noûs, 20(4), 574–576.
Bernstein, R. J. (1983). Beyond objectivism and relativism: Science, hermeneutics, and praxis. Philadelphia, PA: Univ of Pennsylvania Press.
Besson, U., Borghi, L., De Ambrosis, A., & Mascheretti, P. (2007). How to teach friction: Experiments and models. American Journal of Physics, 75(12), 1106–1113.
Bevilacqua, F., & Giannetto, E. (1995). Hermeneutics and science education: The role of history of science. Science & Education, 4(2), 115–126.
Borda, E. (2007). Applying Gadamer’s concept of disposition to science and science education. Science & Education, 16(9), 1027–1041.
Carvalho, P. S., & Sousa, A. S. E. (2005). Rotation in secondary school: Teaching the effects of frictional force. Physics Education, 40(3), 257–265.
Cheong, Y. W., Ha, S., Byun, T., & Lee, G. (2011). Student understanding of friction: How students’ reasoning affects problem-solving? Journal of Korean Physicical Society Submitted.
Develaki, M. (2007). The model-based view of scientific theories and the structuring of school science programmes. Science & Education, 16, 725–749.
Eger, M. (1992). Hermeneutics and science education: An introduction. Science & Education, 1(4), 337–348.
Eger, M. (1993). Hermeneutics as an approach to science: Part i. Science & Education, 2(1), 1–29.
Eger, M. (1997). Achievements of the hermeneutic-phenomenological approach to natural science a comparison with constructivist sociology. Man and World, 30(3), 343–367.
Feynman, R. P., Leighton, R. B., & Sands, M. L. (2006). The Feynman lectures on physics. Redwood City, Calif: Addison-Wesley.
Gadamer, H. G. (1975a). Truth and method (2nd ed.). New York: Continuum.
Gadamer, H. G. (1975b). Hermeneutics and social science. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 2(4), 307.
Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. New York: Basic Books.
Giere, R. N., Bickle, J., & Mauldin, R. F. (2006). Understanding scientific reasoning (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson/Wadsworth.
Gunstone, R. F. (1988). Two teaching strategies for considering children’s science. Yearbook of the International Council of the Association for Science Education, 2, pp 1–12.
Hake, R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74.
Halloun, I. A. (2007). Mediated modeling in science education. Science & Education, 16, 653–697.
Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time. (trans: Macquarrie, J., & Robinson, E.). New York: Harper.
Hestenes, D. (1987). Toward a modeling theory of physics instruction. American Journal of Physics, 55(5), 440–454.
Hestenes, D. (1992). Modeling games in the Newtonian world. American Journal of Physics, 60(8), 732–748.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Kalman, C. S. (2008). Successful science and engineering teaching: Theoretical and learning perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.
Kalman, C. S. (2011). Enhancing students’ conceptual understanding by engaging science text with reflective writing as a hermeneutical circle. Science & Education, 20(2), 159–172.
Kalman, C. S., Morris, S., Cottin, C., & Gordon, R. (1999). Promoting conceptual change using collaborative groups in quantitative gateway courses, physics educational research supplement. American Journal of Physics, 67, S45–S51.
Kalman, C. S., Rohar, S., & Wells, D. (2004). Enhancing conceptual change using argumentative essays. American Journal of Physics, 72, 715–717.
Kockelmans, J. J. (1997). On the hermeneutical nature of modern natural science. Man and World, 30(3), 299–313.
Krim, J. (2002). Resource letter: Fmmls-1: Friction at macroscopic and microscopic length scales. American Journal of Physics, 70(9), 890–897.
Mazur, E. (1997). Peer instruction: A user’s manual. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Mazur, E. (2009). Farewell, lecture? Science, 323, 50–51.
McDermott, L. C., Heron, P. R. L., Shaffer, P. S., & Stetzer, M. R. (2006). Improving the preparation of K-12 teachers through physics education research. American Journal of Physics, 74(9), 763–767.
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Palmer, R. E. (1969). Hermeneutics: Interpretation theory in Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Heidegger, and Gadamer. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Reichertz, J. (2002). Objective hermeneutics and hermeneutic sociology of knowledge. In Flick, U., Kardorff, E. V., Steinke, I (Eds). Qualitative Research: A Handbook. London: Sage Publications.
Slavin, R. E. (1980). Cooperative learning. Review of Educational Research, 50(2), 315–342.
Vygotsky, L. S., Carton, A. S., & Rieber, R. W. (1987). The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky. Volume 1 (including the volume thinking and speech). New York: Plenum Press.
Warnke, G. (1987). Gadamer: Hermeneutics, tradition and reason. Cambridge: Polity.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ha, S., Lee, G. & Kalman, C.S. Workshop on Friction: Understanding and Addressing Students’ Difficulties in Learning Science Through a Hermeneutical Perspective. Sci & Educ 22, 1423–1441 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9465-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9465-5