Skip to main content
Log in

Stakeholder Theory, Corporate Governance and Public Management: What can the History of State-Run Enterprises Teach us in the Post-Enron era?

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper raises a challenge for those who assume that corporate social responsibility and good corporate governance naturally go hand-in-hand. The recent spate of corporate scandals in the United States and elsewhere has dramatized, once again, the severity of the agency problems that may arise between managers and shareholders. These scandals remind us that even if we adopt an extremely narrow concept of managerial responsibility – such that we recognize no social responsibility beyond the obligation to maximize shareholder value – there may still be very serious difficulties associated with the effective institutionalization of this obligation. It also suggests that if we broaden managerial responsibility, in order to include extensive responsibilities to various other stakeholder groups, we may seriously exacerbate these agency problems, making it even more difficult to impose effective discipline upon managers. Hence, our central question: is a strong commitment to corporate social responsibility institutionally feasible? In searching for an answer, we revisit the history of public management, and in particular, the experience of social-democratic governments during the 1960s and 1970s, and their attempts to impose social responsibility upon the managers of nationalized industries. The results of this inquiry are less than encouraging for proponents of corporate social responsibility. In fact, the history of public-sector management presents a number of stark warnings, which we would do well to heed if we wish to reconcile robust social responsibility with effective corporate governance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bainbridge, S. M.: 2002, Corporation Law and Economics (Foundation Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boardman, A. E. and A. R. Vining: 1989, 'Ownership and Performance in Competitive Environments: A Comparison of the Performance of Private, Mixed, and State-Owned Enterprises', Journal of Law and Economics 32, 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boatright, J. R.: 1999, Ethics in Finance (Blackwell, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, A.: 1996, 'Toward a Theory of the Ethics of Bureaucratic Organizations', Business Ethics Quarterly 6, 419–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrough, B. and J. Heylar: 1992, Barbarians at the Gate (HarperCollins, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. E.: 1995, Incentives (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. M.: 1937, 'The Nature of the Firm', Economica, NS 4, 386–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A.: 1997, 'The Power of Incentives in Private versus Public Organizations,' American Economic Review 87, 378–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T. and L. Preston: 1995, 'A Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications,' Academy of Management Review 20/1.

  • Easterbrook, F. and D. Fischel: 1991, The Economic Structure of Corporate Law (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass).

    Google Scholar 

  • Feigenbaum, H.: 1982, 'Public Enterprises in Comparative Perspective', Comparative Politics 15, 101–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferner, A.: 1988, Governments, Managers and Industrial Relations (Basil Blackwell, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, E.: 1984, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (Pitnam, Boston).

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M.: 1970, 'The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits', New York Times Magazine (13 September).

  • Gibson, K.: 2000, 'The Moral Basis of Stakeholder Theory', Journal of Business Ethics 26, 245–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R.: 1998, Contemporary Strategy Analysis (Blackwell, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, D.: 2001, Misguided Virtue: False Notions of Corporate Social Responsibility (New Zealand Business Roundtable, Wellington).

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmström, B. and P. Milgrom: 1991, 'Multi-task Principal-Agent Analysis', Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 7, 24–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T., A. Wicks and R. E. Freeman: 2002, 'Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art', in N. Bowie (ed.), Blackwell Guide to Business Ethics (Blackwell, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Laffont, J.-J. and D. Martimort: 2002, The Theory of Incentives (Princeton University Press, Princeton).

    Google Scholar 

  • Langford, J. and K. Huffman: 1988, 'Air Canada', in A. Tupper and G. B. Doern (eds.).

  • Lewin, A. Y.: 1982, 'Public Enterprise, Purposes and Performance: A Survey of Western European Experience', in W. T. Stanbury and F. Thompson (ed.), Managing Public Enterprises (Prager, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcoux, A.: 2000, 'Business Ethics Gone Wrong', Cato Institute.

  • Nora, S.: 1967, Rapport sur les enterprises publiques (Paris, La documentation française).

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, W. and C. MacDonald: 2004, 'Getting to the Bottom of 'Triple Bottom Line', Business Ethics Quarterly 14, 243–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paine, L. S.: 2003, Value Shift: Why Companies Must Merge Social and Financial Imperatives to Achieve Superior Performance (McGraw-Hill, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, J., J. Quinn and R. Resendes: 1983, 'A Case Study of Public Enterprise: Gray Coach Lines Ltd', in R. Prichard (ed.), Crown Corporations in Canada (Burrerworth, Toronto).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramanadham, V. V.: 1991, The Economics of Public Enterprise (Routledge: London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmusen, E.: 1989, Games and Information. 2nd edition (Blackwell, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shankman, N. A.: 1999, 'Reframing the Debate Between Agency and Stakeholder Theories of the Firm,' Journal of Business Ethics 19, 319–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, G.: 1988, 'Canadian National Railways and Via Rail', in A. Tupper and G. B. Doern (eds.).

  • Stiglitz, J., et al.: 1989, The Economic Role of the State (Basil Blackwell, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J.: 1996, Whither Socialism? (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tupper, A. and G. B. Doern: 1988, Privatization, Public Policy and Public Corporations in Canada (Institute for Research on Public Policy, Montreal).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.: 1985, The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (Free Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heath, J., Norman, W. Stakeholder Theory, Corporate Governance and Public Management: What can the History of State-Run Enterprises Teach us in the Post-Enron era?. Journal of Business Ethics 53, 247–265 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000039418.75103.ed

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000039418.75103.ed

Navigation