Abstract
The terms ``objectivity'' and ``objective'' are among the mostused yet ill-defined terms in the philosophy of science and epistemology. Common to all thevarious usages is the rhetorical force of ``I endorse this and you should too'', orto put it more mildly, that one should trust the outcome of the objectivity-producing process.The persuasive endorsement and call to trust provide some conceptual coherenceto objectivity, but the reference to objectivity is hopefully not merely an attemptat persuasive endorsement. What, in addition to epistemological endorsement,does objectivity carry with it? Drawing on recent historical and philosophical work,I articulate eight operationally accessible and distinct senses of objectivity.While there are links among these senses, providing cohesion to the concept, I argue thatnone of the eight senses is strictly reducible to the others, giving objectivity itsirreducible complexity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Daston, Lorraine: 1992, 'Objectivity and the Escape from Perspective', Social Studies of Science 22, 597‐618.
Daston, Lorraine and Peter Gallison: 1992, 'The Image of Objectivity', Representations 81‐128.
Douglas, Heather: 2000, 'Inductive Risk and Values in Science', Philosophy of Science 67, 559‐579.
Fine, Arthur: 1998, 'The Viewpoint of No-One in Particular', Proceedings and Addresses of the APA 72, 9‐20.
Giere, Ronald: 1999, Science without Laws, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Hacking, Ian: 1983, Representing and Intervening, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Hull, David: 1988, Science as a Process, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Kitcher, Philip: 1993, The Advancement of Science, Oxford University Press, New York.
Kosso, Peter: 1989, 'Science and Objectivity', The Journal of Philosophy 86, 245‐257.
Lloyd, Elisabeth: 1995, 'Objectivity and the Double Standard for Feminist Epistemologies', Synthese 104, 351‐381.
Longino, Helen: 1990, Science as Social Knowledge, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Megill, Alan: 1994, 'Introduction: Four Senses of Objectivity', in Alan Megill (ed), Rethinking Objectivity, Duke University Press, Durham, pp. 1‐20.
Nagel, Thomas: 1986, The View from Nowhere, Oxford University Press, New York.
Nozick, Robert: 1998, 'Invariance and Objectivity', Proceedings and Addresses of the APA 72, 21‐48.
Nye, Mary Jo: 1972, Molecular Reality, American Elsevier, New York.
Porter, Theodore: 1995, Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Porter, Theodore: 1992, 'Quantification and the Accounting Ideal in Science', Social Studies of Science 22, 633‐652.
Quine, W. V. O.: 1992, The Pursuit of Truth, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Scientific Advisory Board (SAB): 2001, Dioxin Reassessment ‐ An SAB Review of the Office of Research and Development's Reassessment of Dioxin, EPA-SAB-EC-01-006, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Douglas, H. The Irreducible Complexity of Objectivity. Synthese 138, 453–473 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SYNT.0000016451.18182.91
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SYNT.0000016451.18182.91