Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Responsible Property Investing in Canada: Factoring Both Environmental and Social Impacts in the Canadian Real Estate Market

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Institutional investors and corporations increasingly recognize that extra-financial determinants of business performance can both create value and uncover significant risks within a business or investment portfolio. For companies that invest in, develop, own, or operate commercial real estate assets, this awareness of extra-financial impacts has led to a significant interest in what has been called “responsible property investment (RPI)”. Within the field of RPI, green real estate – real estate investment and management that seeks to reduce the environmental impacts of building construction and operations – has begun to receive attention. This attention has been extended over the past decade to community property development projects, where both social and environmental considerations related not only to the building, but also the project site and surrounding community are integrated into management and investment decisions. Some examples of these projects include affordable and workforce housing, urban revitalization and brownfield redevelopment. More social-focussed issues such as labour and workplace considerations are also key components of responsible property investing, yet to date labour issues have received little attention in the RPI literature and workplace considerations are reflected indirectly through environmental considerations in the green building literature. This paper explores responsible real estate investment in Canada by taking an integrated approach in examining both environmental and social factors and their potential impact on such investments. A series of semi-structured interviews are conducted with key stakeholders in Canada to gain insight into how using environmental and social factors may influence long-term risk and financial returns in real estate investment in Canada with particular emphasis on institutional investors engaged in these practices. Data is used to analyse the impact that ESG considerations have on financial performance of these assets. Jantzi-Sustainalytics ESG ratings are used along with the stock price changes of fourteen real estate companies and REITs to interrogate this question.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Apollo Alliance: 2008, The New Apollo Program, Clean Energy Good Jobs (Apollo Alliance), http://apolloalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/fullreportfinal.pdf.

  • Bernstein, H.: 2007, ‘Green Building: Trends Driving Change’, World GBC International Congress, July 9, Toronto, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloomberg Data Services: 2009, http://www.bloomberg.com, Terminal Accessed July 2009

  • Canadian Green Building Council (CaGBC): 2010, ‘LEED for Neighbourhood Development’ (LEED ND).

  • Carmichael, I.: 2005, Pension Power: Unions, Pension Plans and Socially Responsible Investment (Toronto, Canada, University of Toronto Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • City of Toronto: 2008, Toronto Green Standard, http://www.toronto.ca/planning/greendevelopment.htm.

  • Clark, G. L. and T. Hebb: 2005, ‘Why do they care? The Market for Corporate Global Responsibility and the Role of Institutional Investors’, Environment and Planning A 37, 2015-2031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costar: 2008, Commercial Real Estate and the Environment (Costar Green Study, United States), 61 pp.

  • Eichholtz, P. M. A., N. Kok and J. M. Quigley: 2009, ‘Doing Well by Doing Good: Green Office Buildings’, American Economic Review (forthcoming).

  • Eichholtz, Piet M.A., N. Kok and J.M Quigley: 2010, ‘Sustainability and the Dynamics of Green Buildings’, European Centre for Corporate Engagement, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, L., S. Sayce and J. Smith: 2007, ‘Socially Responsible Property Investment: Quantifying the Relationship Between Sustainability and Investment Property Worth’, Journal of Property Research, 24(3), 191 - 219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuerst, F. and P. McAllister: 2009, ‘New Evidence on the Green Building Rent and Price Premium’, Working Paper Series, Henley Business School, Reading University, UK.

  • Galley, L., J. Rogers and D. Wood: 2009, ‘Metrics for Responsible Property Investing: Developing and Maintaining a High Performance Portfolio’, Urban Land Institute Fall Council Forum, Los Angeles, CA.

  • Garland, B.: 2007, March/April, ‘The Unions are Here’, Sanitation Canada, pp. 13–94.

  • Gozan J. and M. Moye: 2000, Impacts of Quality Building Management and Services, Service Employees International Union, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagerman, L., G. Clark and T. Hebb: 2007, ‘Investment Intermediaries in Economic Development: Linking Public Pension Funds to Urban Revitalization’, Community Development Investment Review, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, 3(1), 45–65.

  • Hagerman, L. and T. Hebb: 2009, ‘Balancing Risk and Return in Urban Investing’, in G. L. Clark, A. D. Dixon and A. H. B. Monk (eds.), Managing Financial Risks: From Global to Local (Oxford University Press, Oxford).

  • Hamilton, A., T. Hebb and D. Wood: 2009, ‘Responsible Property Investing and Property Management: Exploring the Impacts of Good Labour Practices on Property Performance’, SHARE Report, Vancouver, Canada, 44 pp.

  • Harji, K.: 2008, ‘Investing in Housing: PSAC and Alterna Case Study’, Carleton Centre for Community Innovation, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebb, T.: 2005, ‘Pension Funds and Urban Revitalization California Case Study B: Real Estate CalPERS’ California Urban Real Estate Initiative’, Oxford University Centre for the Environment Working Paper 05-16, Oxford, UK.

  • Hebb, T.: 2007, ‘CalSTRS Case Study: Diversity as an Investment Framework: CalSTRS Targeted Investment’, Strategy, Working Paper, Oxford University Centre for the Environment.

  • Heerwagen, Judith H.: 2000, ‘Green Buildings, Organizational Success, and Occupant Productivity’, Journal of Building Research and Information, 28(5), 353-367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemphill, L., S. McGreal, J. Berry and S. Watson: 2006, ‘Leadership, Power and Multi-sector Urban Regeneration Partnerships’, Urban Studies, 43(1), 59- 80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt Associates: 2009, ‘2009 Best Employers in Canada’, Toronto, Canada, http://www.hewittassociates.com/Intl/NA/en-CA/AboutHewitt/Newsroom/PressReleaseDetail.aspx?cid=6350.

  • Institute for Responsible Investing: 2007, Handbook on Responsible Investing Across All Asset Classes, Boston College, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kats, G.: 2007, ‘Greener Buildings: “The New Normal?”’ Presented at the Green Real Estate Conference, April 18, Toronto.

  • Kats, G., et al.: 2003, ‘The Costs and Financial Benefits of Green Buildings: A Report to California’s Sustainable Building Task Force’, CA.

  • Kellert, S. R., J. Heerwagen and M. Mador: 2008, Biophilic Design: The Theory, Science and Practice of Bringing Buildings to Life (Wiley and Sons)

  • Kok, N.: 2008, Corporate Governance and Sustainability in Global Property Markets. Doctoral Dissertation, Maastricht University, the Netherlands.

  • Kryhul, A.: 2009, September 15, ‘Report on Business’, Globe and Mail, p. B8.

  • Kumar, Satish, & W. J. Fisk: 2002, ‘The Role of Energy-Efficient Technology in Promoting Workplace Productivity and Health: Final Report’, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Livermore, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamore R. T. Link, and T. Blackmond: 2006, ‘Renewing People and Places: Institutional Investment Policies That Enhance Social Capital and Improve the Built Environment of Distressed Communities’, Journal of Urban Affairs, 28 (5), 429–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucuik, M., W. Trusty, N. Larsson and R. Charette: 2005, A Business Case for Green Buildings in Canada (Industry Canada, Morrison Hershfield, Ottawa, Canada), 68 pp.

  • Matthiessen, L., P. Morris and D. Langdon: 2007, ‘The Cost of Green Revisited: Re-Examining the Feasibility and Cost Impact of Sustainable Design in the Light of Increased Market Adoption’, Boston, MA.

  • Miller, Norm, J. Spivey and A. Florance: 2007, ‘Does Green Pay Off?’ Burnham Moores Centre for Real Estate, San Diego, CA, 18p.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Roundtable on the Environment and the Economy (NRTEE): 2002, Annual Report of the National Roundtable on the Environment and the Economy (Government of Canada, Ottawa, Canada).

  • National Roundtable on the Environment and the Economy (NRTEE): 2009, Geared for Change, Energy Efficiency in Canada’s Commercial Building Sector, A Report of the National Roundtable on the Environment and the Economy (Government of Canada, Ottawa, Canada).

  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD): 2000, ‘The Partial Renaissance of Self-Employment’, in OECD Employment Outlook, 187 pp.

  • Pembina Institute: 2004, CANMET Energy Technology Sector and Buildings Group (Pembina Institute, Ottawa, Canada).

  • Persram, S., N. Larsson and M. Lucuik: 2007, ‘Marketing Green Buildings to Tenants of Leased Properties’, Working Paper, Ottawa, Canada.

  • Pivo, G. and J. Fisher: 2008, ‘Investment Returns from RPI: Energy Efficient, Transit-Oriented and Urban Regeneration Office Properties in the US from 1998–2008’, Working Paper WP-08-2, Responsible Property Investing Centre, Boston College and University of Arizona, US.

  • Rawlinson, S. and D. Landon: 2007, ‘Sustainability – Managing Water Consumption’, Building Magazine, Issue 26, pp. 2–6.

  • Romm, J. and W. Browning: 1998, ‘Greening the Building and the Bottom Line - Increasing Productivity through Energy-Efficient Design’, Rocky Mountain Institute, Colorado, US.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sass Rubin, J.: 2007, ‘Financing Low Income Communities: Models, Obstacles and Future Directions,’ Russell Sage Foundation, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seppanen O., W.J. Fisk and P. Wargocki: 2006, ‘Quantitative Estimates of the Influence of the Indoor Environment on Productivity in Offices, IAQ Applications, 8(1), 1-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN PRI: 2008, Building Responsible Property Portfolios – A Review of Current Practice by UNEP FI and PRI Signatories, http://www.unpri.org/property, Accessed 19 Aug 2010.

  • UNEP Finance Initiative’s Property Working Group: 2009, ‘Responsible Property Investment: Similar Aims, Different Manifestations’ UNEP FI, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Principles of Responsible Investment (UNPRI): 2010, ‘Principles for Responsible Investing,’ UNEP FI, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Government: 2009, February 17, ‘Economic Stimulus Bill’, US Government.

  • US Green Building Council (USGBC): 2009, LEED New Construction’, US Green Building Council, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel, M. and W. Rees: 1996, Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth (New Society Publishers, Gabriola, BC), 165 pp.

  • World Health Organization (WHO): 2008, ‘Closing the Gap in a Generation, Health Equity through Action on the Social Determinants of Health’, Commission on Social Determinants of Health: Final Report, World Health Organization, Geneva.

  • Wyon, D. P.: 2000, Enhancing Productivity While Reducing Energy Use in Buildings, E-Vision 2000, Key Issues that will Shape Our Energy Future: Analyses and Papers Prepared for the E-Vision 2000 Conference, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Washington, DC, pp. 233–257.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tessa Hebb.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hebb, T., Hamilton, A. & Hachigian, H. Responsible Property Investing in Canada: Factoring Both Environmental and Social Impacts in the Canadian Real Estate Market. J Bus Ethics 92 (Suppl 1), 99–115 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0636-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0636-5

Keywords

Navigation