Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Why a hermeneutical philosophy of the natural sciences?

  • Published:
Man and World Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Why a hermeneutical philosophy of the natural sciences? It is necessary to address the philosophic crisis of realism vs relativism in the natural sciences. This crisis is seen as a part of the cultural crisis that Husserl and Heidegger identified and attributed to the hegemonic role of theoretical and calculative thought in Western societies. The role of theory is addressed using the hermeneutical circle to probe the origin of theoretic meaning in scientific cultural praxes. This is studied in Galileo's discovery of the phases of Venus; the practice of measurement; the different theories and practices of space perception; the historicality and temporality of scientific research communities which ground paradigm change; and the process of discovery. The paper draws particularly from the work of Heidegger. Though envisaging all science and scholarship, the highlighted theme is research in the natural sciences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnheim, Rudolf. 1974. Art and Visual Perception. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babich, Babette E. 1994a. Nietzsche's Philosophy of Science. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babich, Babette E. 1994b. “Continental Philosophies of Science: Mach, Duhem, and Bachelard,” in Routledge History of Philosophy, Volume VIII, Continental Philosophy in the Twentieth-Century Philosophy. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 175–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mara. 1996. “The Rhetoric of Antirealism and the Copenhagen Spirit,” Philosophy of Science, 63, pp. 183–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bly, Robert. 1996. The Sibling Society. Addison-Wesley.

  • Braginsky, Vladimir B. and Khalili, Farid Ya. 1995. Quantum Measurement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (with corrections).

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, R. Philip. 1992. Husserl, Heidegger and the Crisis of Philosophical Responsibility. Dordrecht and Boston: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, John M. and Keutner, Thomas (Editors). 1988. Hermeneutics versus Science? Three German Views. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crease, Robert. 1995. The Play of Nature. Bloomington, IN: University of Indiana Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crombie, Alastair C. 1994. Styles of Scientific Thinking in the European Tradition: A History of Argument and Explanation in the Mathematical and Biomedical Sciences and the Arts. Vols. I–III. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilthey, Wilhelm. 1989. Introduction to the Human Sciences. Trans. by Rudolf Makkreel. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake, Stillman (ed. and trans.) 1957. Discoveries and Opinions of Galileo. New York: Doubleday Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, Hubert L. 1991. Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger's Being and Time. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duhem, Pierre. 1914/1954. The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earman, John (ed.). 1992. Inference, Explanation, and Other Frustrations: Essays in the Philosophy of Science. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • FehĂ©r, Martha. 1988. “The Role of Metaphor and Analogy in the Birth of the Principle of Least Action of Maupertuis (1698–1759),” Internat. Stud. in the Philosophy of Science, 2, pp. 175–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiumara, Gemma Corradi. 1995. The Metaphoric Process: Connections between Language and Life. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fjelland, Ragnar. 1991. “The Theory-ladenness of Observations, the Role of Scientific Instruments, and the Kantian A Priori,” Internat. Stud. in the Philosophy of Science, 5, pp. 269–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1975. Truth and Method. New York: Crossroads Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1981. Reason in the Age of Science. Trans. by Fred Lawrence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, Hans-Georg, Specht, E.K., and Stegmuller, W. 1988. Hermeneutics vs Science? Three German Views. Trans. by John M. Connolly and Thomas Keutner. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The Interpretation of Culture. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, Clifford. 1983. Local Knowledge. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, James J. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grondin, Jean. 1994. Introduction to Philosophical Hermeneutics. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guignon, Charles, B. 1983. Heidegger and the Problem of Knowledge. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, Norwood Russell. 1961. Patterns of Discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Heelan, Patrick A. 1965. Quantum Mechanics and Objectivity: The Physical Philosophy of Werner Heisenberg. The Hague: Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heelan, Patrick A. 1983/1988. Space-Perception and the Philosophy of Science. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heelan, Patrick A. 1983. “Natural science as a hermeneutic of instrumentation,” Philosophy of Science, 50, pp. 181–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heelan, Patrick A. 1987. “Husserl's Later Philosophy of Science,” Philosophy of Science, 54, pp. 368–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heelan, Patrick A. 1989. “After Experiment: Research and Reality,” Amer. Philos. Qrtly., 26, #4, pp. 297–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heelan, Patrick A. 1989. “Yes! There is a Hermeneutics of Natural Science: Rejoinder to Markus,” Science in Context, 3, pp. 477–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heelan, Patrick A. 1991. “Hermeneutical Phenomenology and the History of Science,” in Nature and Scientific Method: William A. Wallace Festschrift. Ed. by Daniel Dahlstrom. Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press, pp. 23–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heelan, Patrick A. 1994. “Galileo, Luther, and the Hermeneutics of Natural Science,” The Question of Hermeneutics: Festschrift for Joseph Kockelmans. Ed. by Timothy Stapleton. Dordrecht/Boston: Kluwer, pp. 363–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heelan, Patrick A. 1995. “An Anti-epistemological or Ontological Interpretation of the Quantum Theory and Theories Like it,” in Continental and Postmodern Perspectives in the Philosophy of Science. Ed. by B. Babich, D. Bergoffen, and S. Glynn. Aldershot/Brookfield, VT: Avebury Press, pp. 55–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heelan, Patrick A. 1996 (forthcoming). “HermĂ©neutique de la Science ExpĂ©rimentale: La MĂ©canique Quantique et les Sciences Sociales,” prĂ©parĂ© pour le SĂ©minaire de Cerisy-la-Salle, Paris, Septembre 1994, in Hermeneutique: sciences et textes. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, Martin. 1927/1962. Being and Time. Trans. from the German by John Macquarrie. Oxford: Blackwell 1962. Originally published as Sein und Zeit, 1927. In the notes abbreviated to BT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, Martin. 1966. Discourse on Thinking: Translation of Gelassenheit. Trans. by John Anderson and E. Hans Freund. New York: Harper and Row. In the notes abbreviated to DOT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, Martin. 1967. What is a Thing? Trans. by W.B. Barton, Jr. and Vera Deutsch. Chicago: Regnery.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, Martin. 1968. What is Called Thinking? Trans. by J.G. Gray. New York: Harper and Row. In the notes abbreviated to WCT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, Martin. 1972. On Time and Being. Trans. by Joan Stambaugh. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, Martin. 1973. The End of Philosophy. Trans. by Joan Stambaugh. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, Martin. 1977. Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays. Trans. by William Levitt. New York: Harper and Row. In the notes abbreviated to QCT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse, Mary, and Arbib, Michael. 1986. The Construction of Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horgan, John. 1996. The End of Science. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyningen-Huene, Paul. 1993. Reconstruaing Scientific Revolutions: Thomas S. Kuhn's Philosophy of Science. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, Edmund. 1970. The Crisis of European Science and Transcendental Philosophy. Trans. by David Carr. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, Edmund. 1900/1970. Logical Investigations, Vols. I and II. Trans. by J.N. Findlay. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, Edmund. 1948/1973. Experience and Judgment. Ed. by Ludwig Landgrebe. Trans. by J.S. Churchill and Karl Ameriks. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kisiel, Theodore. 1993. The Genesis of Heidegger's Being and Time. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kockelmans, Joseph J. 1993. Idea for a Hermeneutic of the Natural Sciences. Dordrecht/ Boston: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kockelmans, Joseph J. 1985. Heidegger and Science.Washington, D.C.: CARP and University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kockelmans, Joseph J. and Kisiel, Theodore. 1970. Phenomenology and the Natural Sciences:Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1962. The Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1968. The Visible and the Invisible. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1964. The Primacy of Perception. Ed. J. Edie. Evanston IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, Georgy. 1987. “Why is There No Hermeneutics of Natural Science? Some Preliminary Theses,” Science in Context, 1, pp. 5–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monroe, C., Meekhof, D.M., King, B.E. and Wineland, D.J. 1996. “A 'Schrödinger Cat' Superposition State of an Atom,” Science, vol. 272, 24 May 1996, pp. 1131–1136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, Scott. 1996. The Scientific Voice. New York and London: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Needham, Paul. 1996. “Macroscopic Objects: An Exercise in Duhemian Ontology,” Philosophy of Science, 63, pp. 205–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickles, Thomas. 1995. “Philosophy of Science and History of Science,” Osiris, Volume 10, Constructing Knowledge in the History of Science, pp. 139–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okrent, Mark. 1988. Heidegger's Pragmatism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, Andrew. 1995. TheMangle of Truth: Time, Agency, and Science.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pöggeler, Otto. 1987. Martin Heidegger's Path of Thinking. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, Michael. 1964. Personal Knowledge: Toward a Post-Critical Philosophy. New York: Harper and Row Torchbook Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, William J. 1963. Heidegger: Through Phenomenology to Thought. The Hague: Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, Paul. 1978. The Philosophy of Paul Ricoeur: An Anthology of His Work. Boston, MA: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, Paul. 1981. Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences: Essays on Language, Action and Interpretation. Ed. and Trans. by John B. Thompson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehkaemper, Felix. 1995. “Perspektive ist des Malers beste Kunst,” in Logos, pp. 122–146.

  • Rouse, Joseph. 1987. Knowledge and Power: Toward a Political Philosophy of Science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouse, Joseph. 1996. Engaging Seience. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharff, Robert. 1995. Comte After Positivism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, Alfred. 1973. The Problem of Social Reality. Vol. 1 of Collected Papers. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellars, Wilfred. 1963. Science, Perception, and Reality. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vattimo, Gianni. 1992. The Transparent Society. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Philosophy Department, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C., USA

    Patrick A. Heelan

Authors
  1. Patrick A. Heelan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heelan, P.A. Why a hermeneutical philosophy of the natural sciences?. Continental Philosophy Review 30, 271–298 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004203402228

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004203402228

Keywords

Search

Navigation