Like Cats and Dogs: Contesting the Mu Koan in Zen Buddhism

Front Cover
OUP USA, 2014 - Philosophy - 266 pages
Koans are dialogues that stand at the center of Zen Buddhist literature and are often used to provoke the "great doubt" in testing a trainee's progress. The Mu Koan consists of a brief conversation in which a monk asks Master Zhaozhou whether or not a dog has Buddha-nature. According to the main version, the reply is "Mu" literally, "No," but implying the philosophical notion of nothingness. This case is widely considered to be the single best- known and most widely circulated koan record of the Zen school that offers existential release from anxiety to attain spiritual illumination.

In a careful analysis of the historical and rhetorical basis of the literature, Steven Heine demonstrates that the Mu version of the case, preferred by advocates of the key-phrase approach, does not by any means constitute the final word concerning the meaning and significance of the Mu Koan. He shows that another canonical version, which gives both "Yes" and "No" responses, must be taken into account. Like Cats and Dogs offers critical insight and a new theoretical perspective on "the koan of koans."

 

Contents

1 More Cats Than Dogs? A Tale of Two Versions
1
2 Would a Dog Lick a Pot of Hot Oil? Reconstructing the Ur Version
37
Methodological Reflections on Deconstructing the Emphatic Mu
74
Textual and Historical Deconstruction of the Ur Version
110
Reconstructing the
148
6 When Is a Dog Not Really a Dog? Or Yes We Have No BuddhaNature
188
Notes
213
SinoJapanese Glossary
239
Bibliography
251
Index
261
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

About the author (2014)

Steven Heine is Professor of Religion and History and Director of the Institute for Asian Studies at Florida International University.

Bibliographic information