Skip to main content

Philosophical Pragmatism in Poincare

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Reason and Argument ((REAR,volume 2))

Abstract

At the beginning Poincaré is using the terms ‘intuition’ and ‘analysis’ in order to describe two psychological attitudes invoived in the logic of invention: Riemann and Klein represent the attitude of intuition, Hermite and Weierstrass the attitude of analysis. Later on, but usually without explicit indication, these two terms stand likewise for two theories about the nature of mathematical activity: on the one hand you concentrate on investigations into the conditions governing the construction (intuition) of mathematical objects, on the other hand you try to describe (analyze) domains of already existing objects.

This paper, written originally in French, was delivered as a lecture at the University of Aix-en-Provence in October 1985; it derives from an attempt to improve on chapter II of my book: Entre intuition et analyse. Poincaré et le concept de prédicativité, Paris 1985.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cf. Poincaré (1905/1906) and Poincaré (1906).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Poincaré (1905/1906) p.817.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Poincaré (1905/1906) p.829. s Poincaré (1906) p.316.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Poincaré (1912) p.5.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ibid., p.4.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ibid, p.2.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Poincaré (1902), p.44.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Loc. cit., ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Poincaré (1908), p.29.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Poincaré (1902), p.44/45.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Poincaré (1906), p.317.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cf. Poincaré (1912), p.5.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Poincaré (1912), p.7.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ibid., p.5.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cf. Poincaré (1909b), p.479.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wey! (1976), p.71.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Poincaré (1909b), p.477.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cf. quotation above at footnote 15.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cf. Poincaré (1909b), p.469.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cf. Kreisel (1960) and Feferman (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cf. Poincaré (1909b), p.482 and Poincaré (1912), p. 9/10.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cf. Heyting (1934), p.4.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Poincaré (1909a), p.195/196.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Poincaré (1909a), p. 196.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Borel (1908), p.446/447.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Vuillemin (1981), p.27.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Heinzmann, G. (1987). Philosophical Pragmatism in Poincare. In: Srzednicki, J. (eds) Initiatives in Logic. Reason and Argument, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3673-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3673-7_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8144-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-3673-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics