Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sex Discrimination and the Affirmative Action Remedy: The Role of Sex Stereotypes

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper explores the psychological phenomena of sex stereotypes and their consequences for the occurrence of sex discrimination in work settings. Differential conceptions of the attributes of women and men are shown to extend to women and men managers, and the lack of fit model is used to explain how stereotypes about women can detrimentally affect their career progress. Commonly-occurring organizational conditions which facilitate the use of stereotypes in personnel decision making are identified and, lastly, data are provided demonstrating the way in which affirmative action programs and practices can act to promote the stereotyping of women suggesting, that rather than being a remedy for sex discrimination, such programs might in fact be another contributor to the problem. Conclusions focus on the importance of attending to the role sex stereotypes play in hindering women's career progress when procedures to combat sex discrimination in organizations are designed and implemented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arvey, R. D. and J. E. Campion: 1982, ‘The Employment Interview: A Summary and Review of Recent Research’, Personnel Psychology 35, 281–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broverman, I. K., S. K. Vogel, D. M. Broverman, F. E. Clarkson and P. S. Rosenkrantz: 1972, ‘Sex-role Stereotypes: A Current Reappraisal’, Journal of Social Issues 28, 59–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darley, S.: 1976, ‘Big-time Careers for the Little Woman: A Dual-role Dilemma’, Journal of Social Issues 32, 85–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaux, K.: 1976, ‘A Perspective on the Attribution Process’, in J. Harvey, W. J. Ickes and R. F. Kidd (eds.), New Directions in Attribution Research (Vol. 1) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaux, K., W. Winton, H. Crowley and L. L. Lewis: 1985, ‘Level of Categorization and Content of Gender Stereotypes’, Social Cognition 3, 145–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaux, K. and T. Emswiller: 1974, ‘Explanation of Successful Performance on Sexlinked Tasks: What Is Skill for the Male Is Luck for the Female’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 29, 80–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dipboye, R. L.: 1987, ‘Problems and Progress of Women in Management’, in K. S. Koziara, M. H. Moskow and L. D. Tanner (eds.), Working Women: Past, Present, Future (BNA Books, Washington, DC), pp. 118–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbins, G. H. and S. J. Platz: 1986, ‘Sex Differences in Leadership: How Real Are They?’, Academy of Management Review 11, 118–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnell, S. M. and J. Hall: 1980, ‘Men and Woman as Managers: A Significant Case of No Significant Difference’, Organizational Dynamics 8 (Spring), 60–76.

  • Eagley, A. H. and B. T. Johnson: 1990, ‘Gender and Leadership Style: A Meta-analysis’, Psychological Bulletin 108, 233–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagley, A. H. and V. J. Steffon: 1984, ‘Gender Stereotypes Stem from the Distribution of Women and Men into Social Roles’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46, 735–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman-Summers, S. and S. Kiesler: 1974, ‘Those Who Are Number Two Try Harder: The Effect of Sex on Attributions of Causality’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 30, 846–855.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feminist Majority Foundation: 1991, Empowering Women in Business (Washington, DC).

  • Feuer, D.: 1988, ‘How Women Manage’, Training 25 (August), 23–31.

  • Fierman, J.: 1990, ‘Why Women Still Don't Hit the Top’, Fortune, July 30, 40–62.

  • Forbes, J. B., J. E. Piercy and T. L. Hayes: 1988, ‘Women Executives: Breaking Down the Barriers?’, Business Horizons, November–December, 6–9.

  • Garcia, L. T., N. Erskine, K. Hawn and S. R. Casmay: 1981, ‘The Effect of Affirmative Action on Attributions about Minority Group Members’, Journal of Personality 49, 427–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlan, A. and C. L. Weiss: 1982, ‘Sex Differences in Factors Affecting Managerial Career Advancement’, in P. A. Wallace (ed.), Women in the Workplace (Auburn House, Boston).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harragan, B. L.: 1977, Games Mother Never Taught You: Corporate Gamemanship for Women (Warner Books, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilman, M. E.: 1980, ‘The Impact of Situational Factors on Personnel Decisions Concerning Women: Varying the Sex Composition of the Applicant Pool’, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 26, 386–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heilman, M. E.: 1983, ‘Sex Bias in Work Settings: The Lack of Fit Model’, in B. M. Staw and L. L. Cummings (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 5) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilman, M. E.: 1984, ‘Information as a Deterrent against Sex Discrimination: The Effects of Applicant Sex and Information Type on Preliminary Employment Decisions’, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 33, 174–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heilman, M. E., C. J. Block, R. F. Martell: 1995, ‘Sex Stereotypes: Do They Influence Perceptions of Managers?’, Journal of Personality and Social Behavior 10(6), 237–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilman, M. E., C. J. Block, R. F. Martell and M. C. Simon: 1989, ‘Has Anything Changed?: Current Characterizations of Males, Females and Managers’, Journal of Applied Psychology 74, 935–942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heilman, M. E. and J. M. Herlihy: 1984, ‘Affirmative Action, Negative Reaction? Some Moderating Conditions’, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 33, 204–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heilman, M. E. and R. A. Guzzo: 1978, ‘The Perceived Cause of Work Success as a Mediator of Sex Discrimination in Organizations’, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 21, 346–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heilman, M. E., R. F. Martell and M. Simon: 1988, ‘The Vagaries of Bias: Conditions Regulating the Undervaluation, Equivaluation and Overvaluation of Female Job Applicants’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 41, 98–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heilman, M. E., C. J. Block and J. A. Lucas: 1992, ‘Presumed Incompetent?: Stigmatization and Affirmative Action Efforts’, Journal of Applied Psychology 77, 536–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Himmelfarb, G.: 1988, ‘Universities Creating Second-class Faculties. Letter to the Editor’, New York Times, May 15.

  • Holloway, F.: 1989, ‘What Is Affirmative Action?’, in F. Blanchard and F. Crosby (eds.), Affirmative Action in Perspective (Springer-Verlag, New York), pp. 9–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, S. A.: 1995, ‘Programs Based on Sex and Race Are Challenged’, New York Times, March 16, first section, pp. 1, 22.

  • Howard, A. and D. W. Bray: 1988, Managerial Lives in Transition (Guilford, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymnowitz, C. and T. D. Schellhardt: 1986, ‘The Glass Ceiling: Why Women Can't Seem to Break through the Invisible Barrier That Blocks Them from the Top Jobs’, Wall Street Journal, March 24, pp. 1D–5D.

  • Jacobson, M. B. and W. Koch: 1977, ‘Women as Leaders: Performance Evaluation as a Function of Method of Leader Selection’, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 20, 149–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jardim, A. and M. Hennig: 1990, ‘The Last Barrier: Breaking into the Boys' Club at the Top’, Working Woman, November, 130–134.

  • Kanter, R. M.: 1977, Men and Women of the Corporation (Basic Books, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, H. H.: 1972, ‘Attribution in Social Interaction’, in E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nibett, S. Valins and B. Weiner (eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior (General Learning Press, Morristown, New Jersey).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, H. H. and J. L. Michela: 1980, ‘Attribution Theory and Research’, in M. Rosenzweig and L. Pater (eds.), Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 31 (Annual Reviews Inc., Palo Alto).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kravitz, D. and J. Platania: 1993, ‘Attitudes and Beliefs about Affirmative Action: Effects of Target and or Respondent Sex and Ethnicity’, Journal of Applied Psychology.

  • London, M. and S. A. Stumpf: 1983, ‘Effects of Candidate Characteristics on Management Promotion Decisions: An Experimental Study’, Personnel Psychology 36, 241–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, E. E. and C. N. Jacklin: 1974, The Psychology of Sex Differences (Stanford University Press).

  • Miner, John: 1977, ‘Motivational Potential for Upgrading among Minority and Female Managers’, Journal of Applied Psychology 62, 691–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, A. M., R. P. White and E. Van Velsor: 1987, Breaking the Glass Ceiling: Can Women Reach the Top of America's Largest Corporations? (Addison-Wesley, Reading).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nacoste, R. W.: 1990, ‘Sources of Stigma: Analyzing the Psychology of Affirmative Action’, Law and Policy 12, 175–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieva, V. F. and B. A. Gutek: 1980, ‘Sex Effects on Evaluation’, Academy of Management Review 5, 267–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noseworthy, C. M. and A. J. Lott: 1984, ‘The Cognitive Organization of Gender-Stereotypic Categories’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 10, 474–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, G. N. and D. A. Butterfield: 1989, ‘The “Good Manager”: Masculine or Androgynous?’, Academy of Management Journal 22, 395–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, G. N.: 1988, Women and Men in Management (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmons, S.: 1987, ‘Top Tiers Still Elude Women’, New York Times, August 17, B4.

  • Schein, V. E.: 1975, ‘Relations between Sex-role Stereotypes and Requisite Management Characteristics among Female Managers’, Journal of Applied Psychology 60, 340–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, V. E.: 1973, ‘The Relationship between Sex-role Stereotypes and Requisite Management Characteristics’, Journal of Applied Psychology 57, 95–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele, S.: 1990, ‘A Negative Vote on Affirmative Action’, New York Times Magazine, May 13, p. 46.

  • Stumpf, S. A. and M. London: 1981, ‘Management Promotions: Individual and Organizational Factors Influencing the Decision Process’, Academy of Management Review 6, 539–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. E.: 1981, ‘A Categorization Approach to Stereotyping’, in D. Hamilton (ed.), Cognitive Processes in Stereotyping and Intergroup Behavior (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ), pp. 83–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. E., S. T. Fiske, N. L. Etcoff and A. J. Ruderman: 1978, ‘Categorial and Contextual Bases of Person Memory and Stereotyping’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36, 778–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tosi, H. L. and S. W. Einbinder: 1985, ‘The Effects of the Type and Amount of Information in Sex Discrimination Research: A Meta-analysis’, Academy of Management Journal 28, 712–723.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkerson, I.: 1991, ‘A Remedy for Old Racism Has a New Kind of Shackles’, The New York Times, September 15, First Section, p. 1.

  • Wycliff, D.: 1990, ‘Blacks Debate the Costs of Affirmative Action’, The New York Times, June 10, News of the Week Section, p. 3.

  • Zellman, G.: 1976, ‘The Role of Structural Factors in Limiting Women's Institutional Participation’, Journal of Social Issues 32, 33–46.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Psychology Department, New York University, New York, NY, 10003-6634, U.S.A

    Madeline E. Heilman

Authors
  1. Madeline E. Heilman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heilman, M.E. Sex Discrimination and the Affirmative Action Remedy: The Role of Sex Stereotypes. Journal of Business Ethics 16, 877–889 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017927002761

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017927002761

Keywords

Search

Navigation