Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T06:57:14.130Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reconstituting the Subject: Feminism, Modernism, and Postmodernism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Abstract

Political agency is vital to the formulation of a feminist politics so feminists have attempted to create a subject that eschews the sexism of the Cartesian subject while at the same time retaining agency. This paper examines some of the principal feminist attempts to reconstitute the subject along these lines. It assesses the success of these attempts in light of the question of whether the subject is a necessary component of feminist theory and practice.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alcoff, Linda. 1988. Cultural feminism versus post‐structuralism: The identity crisis in feminist theory. Signs 13(3): 405–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. 1981. The dialogic imagination. Emerson, Caryl and Holquist, Michael, trans. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
de Beauvoir, Simone. 1948. The ethics of ambiguity. New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
de Beauvoir, Simone. 1972. The second sex. Hammondsworth, England: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla. 1986. The generalized and the concrete other: The Kohlberg‐Gilligan controversy and feminist theory. Praxis International 5: 402–24.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Jessica. 1986. A desire of one's own: Psychoanalytic feminism and intersub‐jective space. In Feminist studies/critical studies. de Lauretis, Teresa, ed. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Braidotti, Rosi. 1987. Envy: Or with your brains and my looks. In Men in feminism. Jardine, Alice and Smith, Paul, eds. New York: Methuen.Google Scholar
Brown, Wendy. 1987. Where is the sex in political theory? Women and Politics 7(1): 323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Coward, Rosalind, and Ellis, John. 1977. Language and materialism: Developments in semiology and the theory of the subject. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Dallmayr, Fred. 1981. The twilight of subjectivity. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
De Lauretis, Teresa. 1984. Alice doesn't: Feminism, semiotics, cinema. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Lauretis, Teresa. 1986. Feminist studies/critical studies: Issues, terms and contexts. In Feminist studies/critical studies. de Lauretis, Teresa, ed. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, Page. 1988. Sowing the body: Psychoanalysis and ancient representations of women. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feral, Josette. 1978. Antigone, or the irony of the tribe. Diacritics 8(3): 214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flax, Jane. 1987. Postmodernism and gender relations in feminist theory. Signs 12(4): 621–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1978. The history of sexuality. Hurley, Robert, trans. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1980. Power/knowledge. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Gallop, Jane. 1985. Reading Lacan. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1979. Central problems in social theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimshaw, Jean. 1988. Autonomy and identity in feminist thinking. In Feminist perspectives in philosophy. Griffiths, Morwenna and Whitford, Margaret, eds. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Hartsock, Nancy. 1987. Rethinking modernism: Minority vs. majority theories. Cultural Critique 7: 187206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hekman, Susan. 1990. Gender and knowledge: Elements of a postmodern feminism. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Jardine, Alice. 1985. Gynesis: Configurations of woman and modernity. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Keller, Catherine. 1986. From a broken web: Separation, sexism and self. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 1977. Of Chinese women. Barrows, Anita, trans. New York: Urizen Books.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 1980a. Desire in language: A semiotic approach to literature and art. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 1980b. Oscillation between power and denial. In New French feminisms. Marks, Elaine and de Courtivron, Isabelle, eds. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 1984. Revolution in poetic language, Waller, Margaret, trans. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 1987. In the beginning was love: Psychoanalysis and faith. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kruks, Sonia. 1987. Simone de Beauvoir and the limits to freedom. Social Text 17:111–22.Google Scholar
Lydon, Mary. 1988. Foucault and feminism: A romance of many dimensions. In Feminism and Foucault: Reflections on resistance. Diamond, Irene and Quinby, Lee, eds. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Nancy. 1986. Changing the subject: Authorship, writing and the reader. In Feminist studies/critical studies. de Lauretis, Teresa, ed. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Moi, Toril. 1986. Introduction. In The Kristeva reader. Moi, Toril, ed. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Nye, Andrea. 1987. The woman clothed with the sun: Julia Kristeva and the escape from/to language. Signs 12(4): 661–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Paul. 1988. Discerning the subject. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1984. Foucault on freedom and truth. Political Theory 12(2): 152–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar