Against Care: Abolition and the Progressive Jail Assemblage
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26522/ssj.v18i2.4295Keywords:
abolition, care, assemblage, jail, community orgaizing, sheriffAbstract
This article uses the concept of a progressive jail assemblage to think about the focus on jails as both a target of social justice organizing and a tool for advancing social justice goals. Drawing on ethnographic research conducted among formerly incarcerated organizers and their allies in Western Massachusetts (New England), I explore how the sheriffs who operate jails in this region, along with their collaborators, have increasingly sought to redefine the figure of the criminal as not just a danger to others but also a danger to themselves, someone in need of rehabilitative treatment and even care. In doing so, these sheriffs have attempted to reinvent their role, from the quintessentially American crime fighting figure, to one who is also a provider of care. Social justice activism has helped to expand the “caring” role of the jail, through increased addiction treatment, re-entry support, and community outreach – even to the extent of incarcerating individuals dealing with addiction who have not been charged with a crime. As progressive jails have been reconfigured as providers of care, abolitionists are confronted with the ongoing dilemma of how to remain a figure opposed to the use of prisons and jails without being seen as against care.
References
Alexander, M. (2010). The New Jim Crow: Mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness. The New Press.
Arutunyan, I. (2017). The progressive jail: An exploration of carceral living conditions and employment/educational life plans [Unpublished masters thesis]. San Jose State University.
Becker, D. (2022, May 31). Mass. is poised to spend millions on forced addiction treatment, reigniting debate over system. WBUR News. https://www.wbur.org/news/2022/05/24/massachusetts-section-35-drug-jail-money-debate
Beckett, K., & Murakawa, N. (2012). Mapping the shadow carceral state: Toward an institutionally capacious approach to punishment. Theoretical Criminology, 16(2), 221- 244. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480612442113
Ben-Moshe, L. (2020). Decarcerating disability: Deinstitutionalization and prison abolition. University of Minnesota Press.
Black Visions Collective. (2020). Minneapolis without policing. https://dataspace.princeton.edu/handle/88435/dsp0147429d357
Byrd, R. M. (2016). “Punishment's twin”: Theorizing prisoner reentry for a politics of abolition. Social Justice, 43(1), 1-22.
Crewe, B., & Ievins, A. (2020). The prison as a reinventive institution. Theoretical Criminology, 24(4), 568-589.
Critical Resistance. (2021). Reformist reforms vs. Abolitionist steps to end imprisonment. https://criticalresistance.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/CR_abolitioniststeps_antiexpansion_2021_eng.pdf
Critical Resistance. (n.d.). What is the PIC? What is abolition? https://criticalresistance.org/mission-vision/not-so-common-language/
Davis, A. Y. (2003). Are prisons obsolete? Seven Stories Press.
Donelan, C. J., Hayes, E., Potee, R. A., Schwartz, L., & Evans, E. A. (2021). COVID-19 and treating incarcerated populations for opioid use disorder. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 124, 108216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2020.108216
Evans, E. A., Harrington, C., Roose, R., Lemere, S., & Buchanan, D. (2020). Perceived benefits and harms of involuntary civil commitment for opioid use disorder. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 48(4), 718-734.
Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Vintage Books.
Garcia, A. (2015). Serenity: Violence, inequality, and recovery on the edge of Mexico City. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 29(4), 455-472.
Garver, B. (2020, October 19). Different crop of inmates: At Berkshire jail, aquaponics program offers food for thought. The Berkshire Eagle. https://www.berkshireeagle.com/news/local/different-crop-of-inmates-at-berkshire-jail-aquaponics-program-offers-food-for-thought/article_b72af8da-0fbc-11eb-aa18-1f038736eb6b.html
Gilmore, R. W. (2007). Golden gulag: Prisons, surplus, crisis, and opposition in globalizing California. University of California Press.
Gilmore, R. W. (2022). Abolition geography: Essays towards liberation. Verso Books.
Hackett, C. (2013). Transformative visions: Governing through alternative practices and therapeutic interventions at a women’s reentry center. Feminist Criminology, 8(3), 221–242.
Horowitz, V., & Gowan, T. (2023). Feminized need and racialized danger: Punitive therapeutics and historical addict tropes in a Midwestern drug court. Theoretical Criminology, 27(1), 23-47.
Hwang, R. (2019). Deviant care for deviant futures: QTBIPoC radical relationalism as mutual aid against carceral care. Transgender Studies Quarterly, 6(4), 559-578.
Irwin, J. (1985). The jail: Managing the underclass in American society. University of California Press.
Kaba, M., & Ritchie, A. J. (2022). No more police: A case for abolition. The New Press.
Kushner, R. (2019, April 17). Is prison necessary? Ruth Wilson Gilmore might change your mind. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/17/magazine/prison-abolition-ruth-wilson-gilmore.html
Lancione, M. (2014). Assemblages of care and the analysis of public policies on homelessness in Turin, Italy. City, 18(1), 25-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2014.868163
Law, V. (2021, February 9). Victoria law’s ‘prisons make us safer’ looks at resistance behind bars. Teen Vogue. https://www.teenvogue.com/story/prisons-make-us-safer-victoria-law-women#:~:text=Politics,Victoria%20Law's%20'Prisons%20Make%20Us%20Safer'%20Looks%20At%20Resistance%20Behind,dismantles%20myths%20about%20mass%20incarceration.&text=The%20United%20States%20incarcerates%20more,of%20the%20world's%20prison%20population
Levenson, J., Textor, L., Bluthenthal, R., Darby, A., Wahbi, R., & Clayton-Johnson, M. A. (2023). Abolition and harm reduction in the struggle for “Care, Not Cages”. International Journal of Drug Policy, 121, 104163.
Li, T. M. (2007). Practices of assemblage and community forest management. Economy and Society, 36(2), 263–293.
Lopez, A. M. (2020). Necropolitics in the “compassionate” city: care/brutality in San Francisco. Medical Anthropology, 39(8), 751-764.
Maher, G. (2021). A world without police: How strong communities make cops obsolete. Verso Books.
Manion, J. (2015). Liberty's prisoners: Carceral culture in early America. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Martin, L. (2021). Halfway house: Prisoner reentry and the shadow of carceral care. New York University Press.
Massachusetts General Law - Part I, Title XVII, Chapter 123, § 35. (1986). https://malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartI/TitleXVII/Chapter123/Section35
Mofford, J. H. (2011). The devil made me do it!: Crime and punishment in early New England. Rowman & Littlefield.
Murakawa, N. (2014). The first civil right: How liberals built prison America. Oxford University Press.
Panzarella, R. (2002). Theory and practice of probation on bail in the report of John Augustus. Federal Probation, 66(3), 38-42.
Pioneer Valley Project. (2020). Our successes. https://www.pioneervalleyproject.org/our-impact
Pishko, J. (2019, November 19). The re-purposing of the American jail. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2019/11/going-jail-substance-abuse-treatment/602206/
Purnell, D. (2021). Becoming abolitionists: Police, protests, and the pursuit of freedom. Astra Publishing House.
Rothman, D. J. (1980). For the good of all: The progressive tradition in prison reform. In Workshop Papers: Historical approaches to Studying Crime (pp. 271-284). National Institute of Justice. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/good-all-progressive-tradition-prison-reform-historical-approaches
Routon, E. (2021). Legal care and friction in family detention. Cultural Anthropology, 36(2), 312-339.
Schept, J. (2013). ‘A lockdown facility… with the feel of a small, private college’: Liberal politics, jail expansion, and the carceral habitus. Theoretical Criminology, 17(1), 71-88.
Schept, J. (2015). Progressive punishment: Job Loss, jail growth, and the neoliberal logic of carceral expansion. NYU Press.
Shange, S. (2019). Progressive dystopia: Abolition, antiblackness, and schooling in San Francisco. Duke University Press.
Spade, D. (2020). Mutual aid: Building solidarity during this crisis (and the next). Verso Books.
Sufrin, C. (2017). Jailcare: Finding the safety net for women behind bars. University of California Press.
Thuma, E. L. (2019). All our trials: Prisons, policing, and the feminist fight to end violence. University of Illinois Press.
Turner, K., Wallace, D., Miles-Langaigne, D., & Deras, E. (2023). Toward Black abolition theory within radical abolition studies: Upending practices, structures, and epistemes of domination. Journal for Multicultural Education. https://doi.org/10.1108/JME-01-2023-0002
Tsing, A. L. (2015). The mushroom at the end of the world: On the possibility of life in capitalist ruins. Princeton University Press.
UCLA Law. 2021. Covid behind bars data project. https://uclacovidbehindbars.org/
Wacquant, L. (2009). Punishing the poor: The neoliberal government of social insecurity. Duke University Press.
Woodfox, A. (2019). Solitary: Unbroken by four decades in solitary confinement. My story of transformation and hope. Grove Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Justin Helepololei
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles are published in Studies in Social Justice under the Creative Commons "Attribution/Non-Commercial/No Derivative Works" Canada licence.
The copyright for the articles published in this journal is retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles may be used, with proper attribution, in educational and other non-commercial settings. The submission of a manuscript to Studies in Social Justice will be taken to mean that the author understands and agrees to the following:
- the manuscript represents original work not previously published;
- the manuscript is not being considered elsewhere for publication in the same language (publication elsewhere in an alternate language does not preclude acceptance of submission to Studies in Social Justice);
- appropriate written copyright permissions have been secured for republication of any copyrighted material contained in the manuscript;
- copyright for this article is retained by the author, with first publication rights granted to Studies in Social Justice;
- by virtue of its appearance in this open access journal, it is understood that the article is freely available for use, with proper attribution, for educational and other non-commercial purposes;
- reuse of the article for commercial purposes by anyone other than the author requires permission of the author;
- the author agrees to cite Studies in Social Justice as a source whenever h/she later republishes or reuses the article in other platforms.
