Skip to main content
Log in

Toward a modal-structural interpretation of set theory

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Boolos, G.: 1971, ‘The Iterative Conception of Set’, reprinted in P. Benacerraf and H. Putnam (eds.), Philosophy of Mathematics, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, 1983), pp. 486–502, hereinafter cited as “B&P”.

  • Cocchiarella, N. B.: 1986, Logical Investigations of Predication Theory and the Problem of Universals, Bibliopolis, Naples.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cocchiarella, N. B.: 1989, ‘Philosophical Perspectives on Formal Theories of Predication’, in D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (es.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, vol. 4, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake, F. R.: 1974, Set Theory: An Introduction to Large Cardinals, North Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, M. A. E.: 1977, Elements of Intuitionism, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraenkel, A., Y. Bar-Hillel, and A. Lévy: 1973, Foundations of Set Theory, 2nd ed., North Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallen, D.: 1975, Intensional and Higher-Order Modal Logic, North Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gödel, K.: 1947, ‘What is Cantor's Continuum Problem?’, in B&P (op. cit. Boolos), pp. 470–85.

  • Goodman, N.: 1955, Fact, Fiction, and Forecast, Harvard University Press Cambridge.

  • Hallett, M.: 1984, Cantorian Set Theory and Limitation of Size, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellman, G.: 1989, Mathematics without Numbers, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jech, T.: 1978, Set Theory, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanamori and Magidor: 1978, ‘The Evolution of Large Cardinal Axioms in Set Theory’, in G. H. Muller and D. S. Scott (eds.), Higher Set Theory, Springer Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 669, Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreisel, G.: 1967, ‘Informal Rigour and Completeness Proofs’, in I. Lakatos (ed.), Problems in the Philosophy of Mathematics, North Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévy, A.: 1960, ‘Axiom Schemata of Strong Infinity in Axiomatic Set Theory’, Pacific Journal of Mathematics 10, 223–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddy, P.: 1983, ‘Proper Classes’, Journal of Symbolic Logic 48, 113–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzel, C.: 1986, ‘On the Iterative Explanation of the Paradoxes’, Philosophical Studies 49, 37–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. H.: 1980, ‘Beyond First-Order Logic: the Historical Interplay between Mathematical Logic and Axiomatic Set Theory’, History and Philosophy of Logic 1, 95–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H.: 1967, ‘Mathematics without Foundation’, reprinted in B&P (op. cit. Boolos), pp. 295–311.

  • Reinhardt, W.: 1974a, ‘Remarks on Reflection Principles, Large Cardinals and Elementary Embeddings, in T. Jech (ed.), Axiomatic Set Theory (Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, vol. 13, part 2), American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island, pp. 189–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhardt, W.: 1974b, ‘Set Existence Principles of Shoenfield, Ackermann, and Powell’, Fundamenta Mathematicae 84, 5–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, D.: 1974, ‘Axiomatizing Set Theory’, in T. Jech (ed.), op. cit. Reinhardt (1974a), pp. 207–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, S.: 1985, ‘Second Order Languages and Mathematical Practice’, Journal of Symbolic Logic 50, 714–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheperdson, J. C.: 1951–1953, ‘Inner Models for Set Theory’, Journal of Symbolic Logic 16, 161–90; 17, 225–37; 18, 145–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoenfield, J.: 1977, ‘Axioms of Set Theory’, in J. Barwise (ed.), Handbook of Mathematical Logic, North Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 321–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tait, W. W.: ‘The Iterative Concept of Set’, unpublished paper.

  • Weston, T.: 1976, ‘Kreisel, the Continuum Hypothesis, and Second Order Set Theory’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 5, 281–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zermelo, E.: 1930, ‘Über Grenzzahlen und Mengenbereiche: neue Untersuchungen über die Grundlagen der Mengenlehre’, Fundamenta Mathematica 16, 29–47.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hellman, G. Toward a modal-structural interpretation of set theory. Synthese 84, 409–443 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00485188

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00485188

Navigation