Abstract
Research in psychopathology is booming in an unprecedented way, at least, in terms of increasing number of publications. Yet, a few questions arise: Does quantity also give us quality? Are the collected data generally of sound quality? How are data typically collected in psychopathology? Are the applied methods of data collection appropriate for this particular field of study? This article explores three different methods of data collection in psychopathology, namely self-rating scales, structured interviews, and semi-structured, phenomenological interviews. To identify the most adequate methodological approach, we first establish the nature of the object of psychopathology and then we critically assess each method’s appropriateness to this field of study. We emphasize fundamental issues that make self-rating scales and structured interviews unfit for the task of adequately examining psychopathology. By contrast, we propose that a semi-structured, phenomenological interview presents a more appropriate method. Finally, we describe two types of semi-structured, phenomenological interviews that can be applied to assess and explore psychopathology, respectively.
Change history
15 September 2021
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-021-09776-5
Notes
In this context, “reliability” refers to different interviewers allocating the same diagnosis to the same patient.
The shift from a prototypical to a criteria-based definition of mental disorders was later adopted in The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders (WHO 1992).
“Information variance” refers to differences in what a patient discloses to an interviewer, whereas “criterion variance” refers to differences in interviewers’ assessment of whether the disclosed information fulfills certain diagnostic criteria or not (Jansson and Nordgaard 2016, 30).
SCID was not the first structured diagnostic interview in psychiatry (Spitzer 1983).
In this context, “validity” refers to the extent to which the diagnoses correspond to the “reality” of the diagnostic categories. For example, does the diagnosis of borderline personality disorder successfully “capture” persons with borderline personality disorder and discriminate them from individuals with other disorders?
References
American Psychiatric Association (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, third edition (DSM-III). Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Association.
Andreasen, N. C. (2007). DSM and the death of phenomenology in America: an example of unintended consequences. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 33(1), 108–112.
APA: American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, fourth edition, text revision. Washington: APA.
APA: American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (fifth ed.). Arlington: APA.
Beck, S. M., & Perry, J. C. (2008). The definition and function of interview structure in psychiatric and psychotherapeutic interviews. Psychiatry, 71(1), 1–12.
Berrios, G. E. (2002). Conceptual issues. In H. D’haenen, J. A. den Boer, & P. Willner (Eds.), Biological psychiatry (pp. 3–24). New York: Wiley.
Cooper, J., Kendell, R., Gurland, B., Sharpe, L., & Copeland, J. (1972). Psychiatric Diagnosis in New York and London. London: Oxford University Press.
Csordas, T. J. (2015). Cultural phenomenology and psychiatric illness. In L. J. Kirmayer, R. Lemelson, & C. A. Cummings (Eds.), Re-Visioning Psychiatry (pp. 117–140). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Davidson, L. (2003). Living outside mental illness. New York: New York University Press.
Durand, C. (1909). L’écho de la pensée. Paris: Doin & Cie.
Englander, M. (2012). The interview: Data collection in descriptive phenomenological human scientific research. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 43, 13–35.
Englander, M. (2014). Empathy training from a phenomenological perspective. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 45(1), 5–26.
Englander, M. (2018). Empathy in a social psychiatry. In M. Englander (Ed.), Phenomenology and the social context of psychiatry: social relations, psychopathology, and Husserl's Philosophy (pp. 49–64). Bloomsbury Academic.
Englander, M. (2019). The practice of phenomenological empathy training. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 50(1), 42–59.
Englander, M. (2020). Phenomenological psychological interviewing. The Humanistic Psychologist, 48(1), 54–73.
First, M. B., Gibbon, M., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. W. (2002). User’s guide for the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR axis I disorders – research version – (SCID-I for DSM-IV-TR, November revision). Biometrics Research Department, New York State Psychiatric Institute.
Fisher, R., Geiselman, R., & Raymond, D. (1987). Critical analysis of police interview techniques. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 15(3), 177–185.
Gadamer, H.-G. (1998). Praise of theory, trans. by Chris Dawson. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Giorgi, A. (2009). The descriptive phenomenological method in psychology: a modified Husserlian approach. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
Henriksen, M. G. (2013). On incomprehensibility in schizophrenia. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 12, 105–129.
Henriksen, M. G., & Nordgaard, J. (2014). Schizophrenia as a disorder of the self. Journal of Psychopathology, 20, 435–441.
Henriksen, M. G., Raballo, A., & Parnas, J. (2015). The pathogenesis of auditory verbal hallucinations in schizophrenia: a clinical phenomenological account. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology, 22(3), 165–181.
Henriksen, M. G., Parnas, J., & Zahavi, D. (2019). Thought insertion and disturbed for-me-ness (minimal selfhood) in schizophrenia. Consciousness and Cognition, 74, 102770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2019.102770.
Høffding, S., & Martiny, K. (2016). Framing a phenomenological interview: what, why and how. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 15, 539–564.
Husserl, E. (2008). Logical investigations vol. II, trans. Findlay, J. N. London: Routledge.
Jakobsen, K. (2007). Politiets vidneafhøring set i et kognitionspsykologisk perspektiv. København: Politiskolen, Rigspolitiet.
Jansson, L., & Nordgaard, J. (2016). The psychiatric interview for differential diagnosis. Springer.
Jaspers, K. (1997). General psychopathology, trans. Hoenig, J., & Hamilton, M. W. London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Kebbell, M., & Wagstaff, G. (1999). Face value? Evaluating the accuracy of eyewitness information, Police Research Series Paper 102. London: Great Britain Home Office Research Development and Statistics Directorate.
Kinsey, A., Pomeroy, W., & Martin, C. (1948). Sexual behavior in the human male. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company.
Lazarsfeld, P. (1935). The art of asking WHY in marketing research: three principles underlying the formulation of questionnaires. National Marketing Review, 1(1), 26–38.
Leuret, F. (2007). Fragments psychologiques de la folie. Paris: Éditions Frison-Roche.
McHugh, P. R. (2012). Rendering mental disorders intelligible: addressing psychiatry’s urgent challenge. In K. S. Kendler & J. Parnas (Eds.), Philosophical Issues in Psychiatry II: Nosology (pp. 42–53). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McNemar, Q. (1946). Opinion-attitude methodology. Psychological Bulletin, 43, 289–374.
Mishler, E. (1986). Research interviewing. Context and narrative. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Mølstrøm, I.-M., Henriksen, M. G., & Nordgaard, J. (2020). Differential diagnostic confusion and non-specificity of affective symptoms and anxiety: An empirical study of first-admission patients. Psychiatry Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113302.
Murad, M. H., Asi, N., Alsawas, M., & Alahdab, F. (2016). New evidence pyramid. BMJ Evidence- Based Medicine, 21(4), 125–127. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmed-2016-110401.
Nordgaard, J., & Henriksen, M. G. (2019). Phenomenological psychopathology and quantitative research. In G. Stanghellini, M. Broome, A. Fernandez, P. Fusar Poli, A. Raballo, & R. Rosfort (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of phenomenological psychopathology (pp. 941–951). Oxford University Press.
Nordgaard, J., Revsbech, R., Sæbye, D., & Parnas, J. (2012). Assessing the diagnostic validity of a structured psychiatric interview in a first admission hospital sample. World Psychiatry, 11, 181–185.
Nordgaard, J., Sass, L., & Parnas, J. (2013). The psychiatric interview:validity, structure and subjectivity. European Archives of Psychiatry and Psychology, 263, 353–364.
Nordgaard, J., Jessen, K., Sæbye, D., & Parnas, J. (2016). Variability in clinical diagnoses during the ICD-8 and ICD-10 era. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 51(9), 1293–1299.
Nordgaard, J., Buch-Pedersen, M., Hastrup, L. H., Haahr, U. H., & Simonsen, E. (2019). Measuring psychotic-like experiences in the general population. Psychopathology, 52(4), 240–247.
Parnas, J. (2011). A disappearing heritage: the clinical core of schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 37(6), 1121–1130.
Parnas, J. (2015). Differential diagnosis and current polythetic classification. World Psychiatry, 14(3), 284–287.
Parnas, J., & Bovet, P. (2015). Psychiatry made easy: operation(al)ism and some of its consequences. In K. Kendler & J. Parnas (Eds.), Philosophical Issues in Psychiatry III: The Nature and Sources of historical change (pp. 190–212). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Parnas, J., & Zahavi, D. (2002). The role of phenomenology in psychiatric classification and diagnosis. In M. Maj, W. Gaebel, J. J. Lopez-Ibor, & N. Sartorius (Eds.), Psychiatric diagnosis and classification (pp. 137–162). Wiley.
Parnas, J., & Henriksen, M. G. (2016). Schizophrenia and mysticism: A phenomenological exploration of the structure of consciousness in the schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Consciousness and Cognition, 43, 75–88.
Parnas, J., Møller, P., Kircher, T., Thalbitzer, J., Jansson, L., Handest, P., & Zahavi, D. (2005). EASE: examination of anomalous self-experience. Psychopathology, 38, 236–258.
Rasmussen, A. R., Nordgaard, J., & Parnas, J. (2020). Schizophrenia spectrum psychopathology in obsessive-compulsive disorder: an empirical study. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 270(8), 993–1002.
Ratcliffe, M. (2012). Phenomenology as a form of empathy. Inquiry, 55(5), 473–495.
Rogers, C. R. (1961). On becoming a person. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Sass, L. A. (2019). Three dangers: phenomenological reflections on the psychotherapy of psychosis. Psychopathology, 52, 126–134.
Sass, L. A., & Parnas, J. (2003). Schizophrenia, consciousness, and the self. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 29, 427–444.
Schultze-Lutter, F., Renner, F., Paruch, J., Julkowski, D., Klosterkötter, J., & Ruhrmann, S. (2014). Self-reported psychotic-like experiences are a poor estimate of clinician-rated attenuated and frank delusions and hallucinations. Psychopathology, 47(3), 194–201.
Smith, J. A., & Osborn, M. (2008). Interpretive phenomenological analysis. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods (2nd ed., pp. 53–80). London: Sage Publications.
Spitzer, R. L. (1983). Psychiatric diagnosis: are clinicians still necessary? Comprehensive Psychiatry, 24(5), 399–411.
Spitzer, R. L., Endicott, J., & Robins, E. (1975). Clinical criteria for psychiatric diagnosis and DSM-III. American Journal of Psychiatry, 132, 1187–1192.
Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B. W., Gibbon, M., & First, M. B. (1992). The structured clinical interview for DSM-III-R (SCID). Archives of General Psychiatry, 49, 624–629.
Stanghellini, G. (2013). Philosophical resources for the psychiatric interview. In K. W. M. Fulford, M. Davis, R. G. T. Gipps, G. Graham, J. Z. Sadler, G. Stanghellini, & T. Thornton (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Psychiatry (pp. 321–356). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stanghellini, G., Langer, A. I., Ambrosini, A., & Cangas, A. J. (2012). Quality of hallucinatory experiences: differences between a clinical and a non-clinical sample. World Psychiatry, 11(2), 110–113.
van Manen. (1990). Researching lived experience. Albany: State University of New York Press (SUNY).
Ventura, J., Liberman, R. P., Green, M. F., Shaner, A., & Mintz, J. (1998). Training and quality assurance with the structured clinical interview for DSM-IV (SCID-I/P). Psychiatry Research, 79(2), 163–173.
WHO: World Health Organization. (1992). The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Willig, C. (2008). Introducing qualitative research in psychology: adventures in theory and method. Open University Press.
Zahavi, D. (2014). Empathy and other-directed intentionality. Topoi, 33, 129–142.
Zandersen, M., & Parnas, J. (2019). Borderline personality disorder or a disorder within the schizophrenia spectrum? A psychopathological study. World Psychiatry, 18(1), 109–110.
Zandersen, M., Henriksen, M. G., & Parnas, J. (2019). A recurrent question: what is borderline? Journal of Personality Disorders, 33, 341–369.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The original version of this article was revised: The original version of this article unfortunately contained missing Abstract.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Henriksen, M.G., Englander, M. & Nordgaard, J. Methods of data collection in psychopathology: the role of semi-structured, phenomenological interviews. Phenom Cogn Sci 21, 9–30 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-021-09730-5
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-021-09730-5