Skip to main content
Log in

Ethical Responsibilities Towards Dogs: An Inquiry into the Dog–Human Relationship

  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The conditions of life of many companion animals and the rate at which they are surrendered to shelters raise many ethical issues. What duties do we have towards the dogs that live in our society? To suggest answers to these questions, I first give four possible ways of looking at the relationship between man and dog: master–slave, employer–worker, parent–child, and friend–friend. I argue that the morally acceptable relationships are of a different kind but bears family resemblances to the latter three. As dogs are beings with an interest in their wellbeing, society has certain duties towards the dogs, which can be translated in legislation. But human beings also have special responsibilities towards the dogs they take into their care. Such responsibilities entail caring for their emotional and physical welfare, but also ensuring a bond of trust, which should not easily be broken.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA). (2002). US Pet ownership and demographics Sourcebook. Schaumburg, IL: American Veterinary Medical Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovenkerk, B., Brom, F. W. A., & Bergh, B. J. (2002). Brave new birds. The use of animal integrity in animal ethics. Hastings Center Report, 32, 16–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budiansky, S. (1997). The Covenant of the wild. London: Phoenix.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess-Jackson, K. (1998). Doing right by our animal companions. The Journal of Ethics, 2, 159–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callicott, J. B. (1998). ‹Back together again’ again. Environmental values, 7, 461–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, S. R. L. (1995). Enlarging the community: Companion animals. In B. Almond (Ed.), Introducing applied ethics (pp. 318–330). Oxford, UK & Cambridge, USA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clothier, S. (2002). Bones would rain from the sky: Deepening our relationships with dogs. New York: Warner Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, J. (1995). Origins of the dog: Domestication and early history. In J. Serpell (Ed.), The domestic dog: Its evolution, behaviour and interactions with people (pp. 7–20). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, J. (1999). A natural history of domesticated mammals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coppinger, R., & Coppinger, L. (2001). Dogs: A new understanding of Canine origin, behaviour and evolution. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derr, M. (2004). Dog’s best friend: Annals of the dog–human relationship. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Despret, V. (2004). The body we care for: Figures of anthropo-zoo-genesis. Body & Society, 10(2–3), 111–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endenburg, N. (2001). Animals as companions: Demographic, motivational and ethical aspects of companion animal ownership. Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francione, G. (2000). Introduction to animal rights: Your child or the dog?. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruen, L. (1993). Re-valuing nature. In E. R. Winkler & J. R. Coombs (Eds.), Applied ethics. A reader (pp.␣293–312). Oxford, UK & Cambridge, USA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1991). A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century. In D. Haraway (Ed.), Simians, Cyborgs and women (pp. 149–181). London: Free Association Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (2003). The companion species manifesto: Dogs, people and significant otherness. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (2008). When species meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, J. (Ed.). (1991). The Harper’s forum book: What are we talking about. New York: Citadel Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, L. E. (1991). A morally deep world: An essay on moral significance and environmental ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koler-Matznick, J. (2002). The origin of the dog revisited. Anthrozoös, 15(2), 98–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, K. (1988). Man meets dog. New York: Penguin Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menache, S. (2001). Hunting and attachment to dogs in the Pre-Modern Period. In A. L. Podberscek, E. S. Paul, & J. Serpell (Eds.), Companion animals & us: Exploring the relationships between people & pets (pp. 42–60). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, M. (1984). Animals and why they matter. Athens: University of Georgia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podberscek, A. L., & Gosling, S. (2001). Personality research on pets and their owners: Conceptual issues and review. In A. L. Podberscek, E. S. Paul, & J. A. Serpell (Eds.), Companion animals & us: Exploring the relationships between people & pets (pp. 143–167). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolston, H, I. I. I. (1993). Environmental ethics: Values in and duties to the natural world. In E. R. Winkler, R. Earl, J. R. Coombs, & R. Jerrold (Eds.), Applied ethics. A Reader (pp. 271–292). Oxford, UK & Cambridge, USA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serpell, J., Coppinger, R., & Fine, A. H. (2003). The welfare of assistance and therapy animals: An ethical comment. In S. J. Armstrong & R. G. Botzler (Eds.), The animal ethics reader (pp. 524–529). London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, S., Decuypere, E., Aerts, S., & De Tavernier, J. (2006). History and ethics of keeping pets: Comparison with farm animals. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 19, 17–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stafford, K. (2007). The welfare of dogs. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuan, Y. F. (1984). Dominance and affection: The making of pets. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vilà, C., Savolainen, P., Maldonado, J. E., Amorim, I. R., Rice, J. E., Honeycutt, R. L., et al. (1997). Multiple and ancient origins of the domestic dog. Science, 276(5319), 1687–1689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristien Hens.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hens, K. Ethical Responsibilities Towards Dogs: An Inquiry into the Dog–Human Relationship. J Agric Environ Ethics 22, 3–14 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-008-9120-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-008-9120-y

Keywords

Navigation