Abstract
Subjects were presented a concept identification (CI) task in which stimuli were varied on four dimensions descriptive of people. Half of the stimuli contained names and pictures of well-known people exemplifying the descriptive dimensions. Upon completion of the CI problem, subjects were given a surprise recognition memory task for CI stimuli in which they had to discriminate between old and new stimuli differentiated only by the exemplars that accompanied verbal descriptions. Subjects were scored for the degree to which they accessed stimuli with pictorial exemplars faster than those without them in the recognition task. For subjects whose latencies were not influenced by the pictorial variable, efficiency in CI and accuracy of recognition were positively related to scores on the embedded figures test. It was concluded that field articulation was related to superior ability to process information in a working memory when an analytic processing strategy is used.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Davis, J. K., & Frank, B. M. Learning and memory of field independent-dependent individuals. Journal of Research in Personality, 1979, 13, 469–479.
Hartigan, J. Clustering algorithms. New York: Wiley, 1975.
Jackson, D. N., Messick, S., & Myers, C. T. Evaluation of group and individual forms of embedded-figures measures of field-independence. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1964, 24, 177–192.
MacLeod, C. M., Hunt, E. B., & Mathews, N. N. Individual differences in the verification of sentence-picture relationships. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1978, 17, 493–507.
Nahinsky, I. D., Morgan, M. S., & Oeschger, D. E. Cognitive strategies, field dependence, and the abstraction process. Journal of Research in Personality, 1979, 13, 490–504.
Nahinsky, I. D., Oeschger, D. E., & O’Leary, D. Stimulus memory and contextual cues in the abstraction process. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1977, 31, 102–112.
Pollack, I., Norman, D. A., & Galanter, E. An efficient nonparametric analysis of recognition memory. Psychonomic Science, 1964, 1, 327–328.
Witkin, H. A., Dyk, R. B., Faterson, H. F., Goodenough, D. R., & Karp, S. A. Psychological differentiation. New York: Wiley, 1962.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This investigation was supported in part by the U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Grant DAHC 19-74-G-0007 to the second author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hennessey, J.E., Nahinsky, I.D. Strategy choice and the effect of field independence on abstraction, storage, and retrieval. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 15, 121–124 (1980). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03334485
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03334485