Skip to main content
Log in

Intellectual Capital and Uncertainty of Knowledge: Control by Design of the Management System

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research, couched in the resource-based view of the firm, investigates the potential for reducing an organization’s decision uncertainty within its intellectual capital (IC) operating environment. Using structural equation modeling, we empirically test if organizational design can reduce the perceived uncertainty related to an IC context, which we refer to as knowledge uncertainty. We found evidence that decentralization and technology infrastructure support a results-based IC management control system which in turn is associated with reduced internal decision uncertainty. Finally, our statistics support a good overall fit for our model. Our findings suggest that if managers structure their organizational control systems appropriately for developing IC capabilities, these systems can lead to reduced internal uncertainty regarding human, structural, and relational capital.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alavi, M. and D.E. Leidner: 2001, ‘Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues’, MIS Quarterly 25(1), 107-136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T.A., S.G. Barsade, J.S. Mueller, and B.M. Staw: 2005, ‘Affect and Creativity At Work’, Administrative Science Quarterly 50, 367-403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, T. J.: 2004, ‘Integrating Decentralized Strategy Making and Strategic Planning Processes in Dynamic Environments’, Journal of Management Studies 41(8), 1271-1299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, W.R: 1960, Design for a Brain, (Chapman & Hall, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J.B.: 2001, ‘Resource-Based Theories of Competitive Advantage: A Ten-Year Retrospective on the Resource-Based View’, Journal of Management 27(6), 643-650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, M. C.: 2001, ‘Managing Dispersed Knowledge: Organizational Problems, Managerial Strategies, and Their Effectiveness’, Journal of Management Studies 38(7), 1037-1051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, M. C. and T. Knudsen: 2005, ‘The Role of Routines in Reducing Pervasive Uncertainty’, Journal of Business Research 58(6), 746-757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. A.: 1989, Structural Equations with Latent Variables, Wiley, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bontis, N., M.M. Crossan, and J. Hulland: 2002, ‘Managing an Organizational Learning System by Aligning Stocks and Flows’, Journal of Management Studies 39(4), 437-469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bontis, N. and J. Fitz-enz: 2002, ‘Intellectual Capital ROI: A Causal Map of Human Capital Antecedents and Consequents’, Journal of Intellectual Capital 3(3), 223-247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulton, R.E.S., B.D. Libert, and S.M. Samek: 2000, ‘A business Model for the New Economy’, Journal of Business Strategy 21(4), 29-35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, T. and G.M. Stalker: 1961, The Management of Innovation, Tavistock, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatzkel, J.: 2002, ‘A Conversation With Goran Roos’, Journal of Intellectual Capital 3(2), 96-117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • (COSO) Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission: 1991, ‘Internal Control—Integrated Framework, (The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • (COSO) Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission: 2004, Enterprise Risk Management—Integrated Framework, (The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossan, M.M., H.W. Lane, and R.E. White: 1999, ‘An Organizational Learning Framework: From Intuition to Institution’, Academy of Management Review 24(3), 522-537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, T. H. and L. Prusak: 1998, Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA).

  • Dreyer, B. and K. Grønhaug: 2004, ‘Uncertainty, Flexibility, and Sustained Competitive Advantage’, Journal of Business Research 57(5), 484-494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, R.B.: 1972, ‘Characteristics of Organizational Environments and Perceived Environmental Uncertainty’, Administrative Science Quarterly 17, 313-327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edvinsson, L. and M.S. Malone: 1997, Intellectual Capital, (HarperCollins Publishers Inc, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K.M. and J.A. Martin: 2000, ‘Dynamic Capabilities: What Are They?’, Strategic Management Journal 21(10/11), 1105-1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emery, F.E. and E.L. Trist: 1965, ‘The Causal Texture of Organizational Environments’, Human Relations 18, 21-32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, S.P.: 1989, ‘The Broken Wheel: The Inseparability of Autonomy and Control in Innovation within Organizations’, Journal of Management Studies 26(2), 83-102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R.M.: 1991, ‘The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation’, California Management Review 33(3), 114-134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, G. and C.K. Prahalad: 1994, ‘Competing for the Future’, Harvard Business Review 72(4), 122-128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasgall, A. and S. Shoham: 2008, ‘Knowledge Processes: From Managing People to Managing Processes’, Journal of Knowledge Management 12(1), 51–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Helfat, C. E. and M.A. Peteraf: 2003 ‘The Dynamic Resource-Based View: Capability Lifecycles’, Strategic Management Journal. 24(10): 997-1010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasper, H., J. Mühlbacher, and B. Müller: 2008, ‘Intra-Organizational Knowledge Sharing in MNCs Depending on the Degree of Decentralization and Communities of Practice’, Journal of Global Business and Technology 4(1), 59-67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, L. and Y. Schneider: 2004, ‘Intangibles: A Synthesis of Current Research’, Journal of Intellectual Capital 5(3), 366-388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leifer, R. and G.P. Huber: 1977, ‘Relations Among Perceived Environmental Uncertainty Organization Structure, and Boundary-Spanning behavior’, Administrative Science Quarterly 22(2), 235-247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard-Barton, D.: 1992, ‘Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities: A Paradox in Managing New Product Development’, Strategic Management Journal, Summer Special Issue 13, 111-125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinthal, D.A. and J.G. March: 1993, ‘The Myopia of Learning’, Strategic Management Journal 14, 95-112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macintosh, N. B: 1994, Management Accounting and Control Systems: An Organizational and Behavioral Approach (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, West Sussex, England).

    Google Scholar 

  • Makadok, R.: 2001, ‘Toward a Synthesis of the Resource-Based and Dynamic-Capability Views of Rent Creation’, Strategic Management Journal 22(5), 387-4001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, K. A. and W.A. Van der Stede: 2007, Management Control Systems: Performance Measurement, Evaluation and Incentives, (Pearson Education, Ltd, Essex, England).

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E.T.: 1980, The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, 2nd Edition, (Blackwell, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C.: 1967, ‘A Framework for the Comparative Analysis of Organizations’, American Sociological Review 32(2), 194-208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., S.B. MacKenzie, J.Y. Lee, and N.P. Podsakoff: 2003, ‘Common Method Biases in Behavioural Research: A critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies’, Journal of Applied Psychology 88(5), 879-903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C.K.and G. Hamel: 1990, ‘The Core Competence of the Corporation’, Harvard Business Review 68(3), 79-91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rastogi, P. N.: 2003, ‘The Nature and Role of IC—Rethinking the Process of Value Creation and Sustained Enterprise Growth’, Journal of Intellectual Capital 4(2), 227-248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, H. A., R.J. Vandenberg, T.C. Blum, and P.M. Roman: 2002, ‘Does Decentralization Make a Difference for the Organization? An Examination of the Boundary Conditions Circumbscribing Decentralized Decision-Making and Organizational Financial Performance’, Journal of Management 28(2), 217-244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, S.P.: 1990, Organization Theory: Structure, Design and Applications, (3rd Edition, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roos G., A. Bainbridge, K. Jacobsen: 2001, ‘Intellectual Capital Analysis as a Strategic Tool’, Strategy and Leadership 29(4), 21-26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roos J., G. Roos, N.C. Dragonetti, and L. Edvinsson: 1997, Intellectual Capital: Navigating the New Business Landscape, (Macmillan Press, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Selznick, P.: 1957, Leadership in Administration, (Row-peterson, Evanston, Il).

    Google Scholar 

  • Starbuck, W.H.: 1992, ‘Learning by Knowledge-Intensive Firms’, Journal of Management Studies 29(6), 713-740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, T.A.: 1997, Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organizations, (Currency Book Published by Doubleday, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sveiby, K. E.: 2002, ‘Methods for Measuring Intangible Assets’, http://www.sveiby.com/Portals/0/articles/IntangibleMethods.htm). Retrieved 29 June 2006.

  • Teece, D.J.: 1984, ‘Economic Analysis and Strategic Management’, California Management Review 26(3), 87-110.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Marrewijk, M. and J. Timmers: 2003, ‘Human Capital Management: New Possibilities in People Management’, Journal of Business Ethics 44(2-3), 171-184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volberda, H. W.: 1996, ‘Toward the Flexible Form: How to Remain Vital in Hypercompetitive Environments’, Organization Science 7(4): 359-374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt, B.: 1984, ‘A resource-Based View of the Firm’, Strategic Management Journal 5, 171-180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt, B.: 1995, ‘The Resource-Based View of the Firm: Ten Years After’, Strategic Management Journal 16, 171-174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter, S. G.: 2002, ‘The Satisficing Principle in Capability Learning’, Strategic Management Journal 21(10-11), 981-996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, S.G.: 2003, ‘Understanding Dynamic Capabilities’, Strategic Management Journal 24(10), 991-995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irene M. Herremans.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Herremans, I.M., Isaac, R.G., Kline, T.J.B. et al. Intellectual Capital and Uncertainty of Knowledge: Control by Design of the Management System. J Bus Ethics 98, 627–640 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0642-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0642-7

Key words

Navigation