Skip to main content

Two Varieties of “Better-For” Judgements

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine ((LIME,volume 35))

Abstract

This paper argues against Julian Savulescu’s principle of procreative beneficence. It maintains that prospective parents have no obligation at all to choose the child, out of a range of possible children, who is likely to lead the best life. This is because a standpoint that the author labels “the internal perspective” is a perfectly appropriate one for parents to adopt when thinking about their own future children. It is only policy makers who are obliged to take up an opposing standpoint—“the external perspective”—and to be motivated by the sorts of “better for” judgements that that perspective delivers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aristotle. 1984. Nicomachean ethics. In The complete works of Aristotle, volume two, ed. J. Barnes. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glover, J. 2006. Choosing children: The ethical dimensions of genetic intervention. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herissone-Kelly, P. 2006. Procreative beneficence and the prospective parent. Journal of Medical Ethics 32(3): 166–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parfit, D. 1976. Rights, interests and possible people. In Moral problems in medicine, ed. S. Gorovitz, 373–74. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parfit, D. 1984. Reasons and persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, M. 2007. The best possible child. Journal of Medical Ethics 33(5): 279–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savulescu, J. 2001. Procreative beneficence: Why we should select the best children. Bioethics 15(5/6): 413–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savulescu, J. 2007. In defence of procreative beneficence. Journal of Medical Ethics 33(5): 284–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern-Gillet, S. 1995. Aristotle’s philosophy of friendship. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vehmas, S. 2001. Assent and selective abortion: A response to Rhodes and Häyry. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 10(4): 433–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Herissone-Kelly .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Herissone-Kelly, P. (2009). Two Varieties of “Better-For” Judgements. In: Roberts, M.A., Wasserman, D.T. (eds) Harming Future Persons. International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine, vol 35. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5697-0_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics