Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T16:51:46.472Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Do Development and Democracy Positively Affect Gender Equality in Cabinets?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2015

JOHN HÖGSTRÖM
JOHN HÖGSTRÖM*
Affiliation:
Department of Social Sciences, Mid Sweden Universityjohn.hogstrom@miun.se
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It has been argued that economic development and democracy create new opportunities and resources for women to access political power, which should increase gender equality in politics. However, empirical evidence from previous research that supports this argument is mixed. The contribution of this study is to expand the research on gender equality in politics through an in-depth examination of the effect of development and democracy on gender equality in cabinets. This has been completed through separate analyses that include most of the countries in the world across three levels of development (least-developed, developing, and developed) and across different types of political regimes (democracies, royal dictatorships, military dictatorships, and civilian dictatorships). The results demonstrate that economic development and democracy only affect gender equality in cabinets positively in a few environments. Accordingly, the context is important and there seem to be thresholds before development and democracy have any effect. Development has a positive effect in developed countries and in democracies, but it has a negative effect in dictatorships, and the negative effect is strongest in military dictatorships. The level of democracy has a positive effect mainly in dictatorships, and the strongest effect is in civilian dictatorships. The article demonstrates the importance of dividing samples into subsets to increase understanding of what affects women's representation in cabinets in different environments, and I ask scholars to subset samples and run separate analyses more often in comparative studies.

Type
Research Article
Information
Japanese Journal of Political Science , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , September 2015 , pp. 332 - 356
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alvarez, Mike, Cheibub, José Antonio, Limongi, Fernando and Przeworski, Adam (1996), ‘Classifying political regimes’, Studies in Comparative International Development, 31 (2): 3–36.Google Scholar
Anckar, Carsten (2008), ‘Size, Islandness, and Democracy: A Global Comparison’, International Political Science Review, 29 (4): 433–59.Google Scholar
Arriola, Leonardo R. and Johnson, Martha C. (2014), ‘Ethnic Politics and Women's Empowerment in Africa: Ministerial Appointments to Executive Cabinets’, American Journal of Political Science, 58 (2): 495–510.Google Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel and Katz, Jonathan N. (1995), ‘What To Do (And Not To Do) With Time-Series Cross-Section Data’, American Political Science Review, 634–47.Google Scholar
Beer, Caroline (2009), ‘Democracy and Gender Equality’, Studies in Comparative International Development, 44 (3): 212–27.Google Scholar
Bego, Ingrid (2014), ‘Accessing Power in New Democracies: The Appointment of Female Ministers in Postcommunist Europe’, Political Research Quarterly, 67 (2): 347–60.Google Scholar
Caul, Miki (1999), ‘Women's Representation in Parliament: The Role of Political Parties’, Party politics, 5 (1): 79–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheibub, José Antonio, Gandhi, Jennifer and Vreeland, James Raymond (2010), ‘Democracy and Dictatorship Revisited’, Public Choice, 143 (1–2): 67–101.Google Scholar
Escobar Lemmon, Maria and Taylor Robinson, Michelle M. (2005), ‘Women Ministers in Latin American Government: When, Where, and Why?’, American Journal of Political Science, 49 (4): 829–44.Google Scholar
Fish, M. Steven (2002), ‘Islam and Authoritarianism’, World politics, 55 (1): 4–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geddes, Barbara (1999), ‘What Do We Know about Democratization after Twenty Years?’, Annual Review of Political Science, 2 (1), 115–44.Google Scholar
Geddes, B., Wright, J., and Frantz, E. (2012), ‘New Data on Autocratic Regimes. Available from: http://www.personal.psu.edu/jgw12/blogs/josephwright/GWFAutocraticRegimes1.pdf [accessed 1 March 2013].Google Scholar
Gray, Mark M, Miki Caul, Kittilson and Sandholtz, Wayne (2006), ‘Women and Globalization: A Study of 180 Countries, 1975–2000’, International Organization, 60 (02): 293–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadenius, Axel and Teorell, Jan (2007), ‘Pathways from Authoritarianism’, Journal of Democracy, 18 (1): 143–57.Google Scholar
Hughes, Melanie M. (2009), ‘Armed Conflict, International Linkages, and Women's Parliamentary Representation in Developing Nations’, Social Problems, 56 (1): 174–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Högström, John (2013), ‘Quality of Democracy Around the Globe: A Comparative Study’, doctoral thesis, Mid Sweden University, Östersund, Sweden.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald and Norris, Pippa (2003), Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change Around the World, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald, Norris, Pippa and Welzel, Christian (2002), ‘Gender Equality and Democracy’, Comparative Sociology, 1 (3–4): 3–4.Google Scholar
Kenworthy, Lane and Malami, Melissa (1999), ‘Gender Inequality in Political Representation: A Worldwide Comparative Analysis’, Social Forces, 78 (1): 235–68.Google Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena (2010), ‘Women's Representation in Parliament: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis’, Political Studies, 58 (5): 886–908.Google Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena and O'Brien, Diana Z. (2012), ‘All the President's Men? The Appointment of Female Cabinet Ministers Worldwide’, The Journal of Politics, 74 (3): 840–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend (1999), Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms And Performance In Thirty-Six Democracies, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Matland, Richard E. (1998), ‘Women's Representation in National Legislatures: Developed and Developing Countries’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 109–25.Google Scholar
Matland, Richard E. and Studlar, Donley T. (1996), ‘The Contagion of Women Candidates in Single-Member District and Proportional Representation Electoral Systems: Canada and Norway’, The Journal of Politics, 58 (3): 707–33.Google Scholar
Paxton, Pamela (1997), ‘Women in National Legislatures: A Cross-National Analysis’, Social Science Research, 26 (4): 442–64.Google Scholar
Paxton, Pamela, Hughes, Melanie M. and Painter, Matthew A. (2010), ‘Growth in Women's Political Representation: A Longitudinal Exploration of Democracy, Electoral System and Gender Quotas’, European Journal of Political Research, 49 (1): 25–52.Google Scholar
Paxton, Pamela and Kunovich, Sheri (2003), ‘Women's Political Representation: The Importance of Ideology’, Social Forces, 82 (1): 87–113.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, Alvarez, Michael, Antonio Cheibub, José and Limongi, Fernando (2000), Democracy and Development: Political Regimes and Economic Well-Being in the World, 1950–1990, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Andrew (1999), ‘Women in the Legislatures and Executives of the World: Knocking at the Highest Glass Ceiling’, World Politics, 51 (4): 547–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, David L. and Gelleny, Ronald (2007), ‘Women's Status and Economic Globalization’, International Studies Quarterly, 51 (4): 855–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rizzo, Helen, Abdel-Latif, Abdel-Hamid and Meyer, Katherine (2007), ‘The Relationship Between Gender Equality and Democracy: A Comparison of Arab versus non-Arab Muslim Societies’, Sociology, 41 (6): 1151–70.Google Scholar
Roller, Edeltraud (2013), ‘Comparing the Performance of Autocracies: Issues in Measuring Types of Autocratic Regimes and Performance’, Contemporary Politics, 19 (1): 35–54.Google Scholar
Rosen, Jennifer (2013), ‘The Effects of Political Institutions on Women's Political Representation: A Comparative Analysis of 168 Countries from 1992 to 2010’, Political Research Quarterly, 66 (2): 306–21.Google Scholar
Rule, Wilma (1981), ‘Why Women Don't Run: The Critical Contextual Factors in Women's Legislative Recruitment’, The Western Political Quarterly, 34 (1): 60–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semyonov, Moshe (1980), ‘The Social Context of Women's Labor Force Participation: A Comparative Analysis’, American Journal of Sociology, 534–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siaroff, Alan (2000), ‘Women's Representation in Legislatures and Cabinets in Industrial Democracies’, International Political Science Review/Revue internationale de science politique, 197–215.Google Scholar
Studlar, Donley T. and McAllister, Ian (2002), ‘Does a Critical Mass Exist? A Comparative Analysis of Women's Legislative Representation since 1950’, European Journal of Political Research, 41 (2): 233–53.Google Scholar
Wahman, Michael, Teorell, Jan and Hadenius, Axel (2013), ‘Authoritarian Regime Types Revisited: Updated Data in Comparative Perspective’, Contemporary Politics, 19 (1): 19–34.Google Scholar
Whitford, Andrew B, Wilkins, Vicky M. and Ball, Mercedes G. (2007), ‘Descriptive Representation and Policymaking Authority: Evidence from Women in Cabinets and Bureaucracies’, Governance, 20 (4): 559–80.Google Scholar
Wilson, Matthew C. (2014), ‘A Discreet Critique of Discrete Regime Type Data’, Comparative Political Studies, 47 (5): 689–714.Google Scholar
Viterna, Jocelyn, Fallon, Kathleen M. and Beckfield, Jason (2008), ‘How Development Matters: A Research Note on the Relationship between Development, Democracy and Women's Political Representation’, International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 49 (6): 455–77.Google Scholar
Yoon, Mi Yung (2001), ‘Democratization and Women's Legislative Representation in Sub-Saharan Africa’, Democratization, 8 (2): 169–90.Google Scholar
Yoon, Mi Yung (2004), ‘Explaining Women's Legislative Representation in Sub Saharan Africa’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 29 (3): 447–68.Google Scholar