Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Globalization and Poverty: Oxymoron or New Possibilities?

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The presentation and paper for this conference go to the heart of the relationship between globalization and poverty worldwide. Data from the United Nations reveal the dramatic increase in exports and imports from 1990 to 2004, along with the uneven economic performance/quality of life across development groupings and geographical regions. Thus, findings suggest the possibility that trade growth has failed expectations that developing countries would rise to greater levels of productivity and subsequently reduce abject poverty. Nonetheless, the situation is far from hopeless and real progress can occur with a continued movement by transnational corporations toward socially responsible human rights, proactive governmental strategies that support productive dynamism, and removal of public policies that unfairly restrict less developed nations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agenor, P.-R.: 2004, ‹Does Globalization Hurt the Poor?’, International Economics and Economic Policy 1(1), 21–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birdsall, N.: 2003, ‹Asymmetric Globalization: Global Markets Require Good Global Politics’, Brookings Review 21(2), 22–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Chossudovsky, M.: 1998 ‹Global Poverty in the Late 20th Century’, Journal of International Affairs 52(1), 293–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Dollar, D.: 2005, ‹Globalization, Poverty, and Inequality Since 1980’, The World Bank Research Observer 20(2), 145–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, W. C.: 1998, ‹Creatures, Corporations, Communities, Chaos, Complexity’, Business and Society 37(4), 358–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, W. C.: 2004, ‹A Biocultural Guide to Social Contract’, prepared for Contractarian Approaches to Business Ethics: The Evolution of Integrative Social Contracts Theory, November 12–13, University of Pennsylvania

  • Freeman, R. B. and J. Waldfogel: 2001, ‹The Occupational Wages Around the World Data File’, International Labor Review 36(Spring), 379–401

  • Harrison, A.: 2005, ‹Globalization and Poverty’, University of California at Berkeley and NBER (October), pp. 1–45

  • Hill, R. P. and B. Adrangi (1999), “Global Poverty and the United Nations,” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 18 (2), 135–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, R. P., T. Ainscough and T. Shank: 2007, ‹Corporate Social Responsibility and Socially Responsible Investing: A Global Perspective’, Journal of Business Ethics 70(2), 165–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, R. P. and K. Dhanda: 2003, ‹Technological Achievement and Human Development: A View from the United Nations Development Programme’, Human Rights Quarterly 25(4), 1020–1034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, R. P. and K. Dhanda: 2004, ‹Globalization and Technological Achievement: Implications for Macromarketing and the Digital Divide’, Journal of Macromarketing 24(2), 147–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, R. P., W. Felice and T. Ainscough: 2007, ‹International Human Rights and Consumer Quality of Life: An Ethical Perspective’, Journal of Macromarketing 27(4), 370–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinsch, W.: 2001, ‹Global Distributive Justice’, Metaphilosophy 32(1–2), 58–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milanovic, B.: 2007, ‹Global Income Inequality: What It is and Why It Matters’, in Jomo K. S. and J. Baudot (eds.) Flat World, Big Gaps: Economic Liberalization, Globalization, Poverty & Inequality (New York: ZED Books Ltd), pp. 1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John (1971), A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, Jeffrey D. (2005), The End of Poverty: Economic Possibilities For Our Time, New York: Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, G. E.: 2003, ‹Globalization and the Poorest of the Poor: Global Integration and the Development Process in Sub-Saharan Africa’, Journal of Economic Issues 37(2), 389–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrecker, Ted (2005) “Poverty.” Alternatives Journal, 31 (3), 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snider, J., R. P. Hill and D. Martin: 2003, ‹Corporate Social Responsibility in the 21st Century: A View from the World’s Most Successful Firms’, Journal of Business Ethics 48(2), 175–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN: 2006, Trade and Development Report, 2006. (New York: United Nations Publication)

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP: 2006, Human Development Report: Beyond Scarcity. (New York: Palgrave Macmillan)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ronald Paul Hill or Justine M. Rapp.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hill, R.P., Rapp, J.M. Globalization and Poverty: Oxymoron or New Possibilities?. J Bus Ethics 85 (Suppl 1), 39–47 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9945-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9945-3

Keywords

Navigation