Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 384))

Abstract

Husserl and Cantor were colleagues and close friends during the last 14 years of the nineteenth century, when Cantor was at the height of his creative powers and Husserl in the throes of an intellectual struggle during which he drew apart from people and writings to whom he owed most of his intellectual training and drew closer to the ideas of thinkers whose writings he had not been able to evaluate properly and had consulted too little. I study ways in which Husserl and Cantor might be said to have been alike, while pointing to dissimilarities between them. In particular, I discuss how their ideas overlapped and crisscrossed with regard to mathematics and philosophy, Platonic idealism, abstraction, empiricism, psychologism, actual consciousness and pure logic, Frege’s reviews of their works, metaphysics and mysticism, sets, arithmetization, strange and imaginary numbers and manifolds. I conclude that Cantor was among those of his mentors from whose ideas Husserl drew away and Lotze and Bolzano were among those to whose ideas he drew closer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Über den Begriff der Zahl is published in Husserl, Philosophie der Arithmetik. Mit ergänzenden Texten (1890–1901), Husserliana vol. XII, henceforth cited as PdA, 289–338, and in English as “On the Concept of Number: Psychological Analyses” in Philosophy of Arithmetic, Psychological and Logical Investigations with Supplementary Texts from 1887–1901, henceforth cited as PoA, 305–357.

  2. 2.

    Hereto cp. Hill & da Silva 2013, 368.

  3. 3.

    Husserl’s time in Halle is studied in Gerlach and Sepp 1994.

  4. 4.

    PdA 1–283; PoA 1–299.

  5. 5.

    Many of the articles and reviews were published in Aufsätze und Rezensionen (1890–1910), Husserliana vol. XXII. They are translated and published Husserl’s Early Writings in the Philosophy of Logic and Mathematics, vol. V of Husserl’s Collected Works, which also includes translations of short works published in PdA and Einleitung in die Logik und Erkenntnistheorie, Vorlesungen 1906/07, Husserliana vol. XXIV.

  6. 6.

    Husserl, Logische Untersuchungen, Bd I: Prolegomena zur reinen Logik, Max Niemeyer, Halle, 1900 (21913), henceforth cited as PRe. Bd II: Untersuchungen zur Phänomenologie und Theorie der Erkenntnis, Max Niemeyer, Halle a.d.S., 1901 (21913–1921). English translation: Logical Investigations (J. N. Findlay, translator), Routledge and Kegan Paul, New York 1970, henceforth cited as LI.

  7. 7.

    See Cantor letter’s 240, 264, 291 as translated and published in Hill & da Silva 2013, specifically pages 367–369, 374–375, 377.

  8. 8.

    See M. Husserl 1988, §E.

  9. 9.

    Husserl’s training in mathematics is discussed at length in my essay “On Husserl’s Mathematical Apprenticeship and Philosophy of Mathematics” in Hill 2002a.

  10. 10.

    See Hill 1998.

  11. 11.

    See PdA 294; PoA 310.

  12. 12.

    Quotes after Hallett 1984, 7.

  13. 13.

    Dauben 1979, 120.

  14. 14.

    See Dauben 1979, Chapter 6, 120–148, “Cantor’s Philosophy of the Infinite” for an in depth discussion.

  15. 15.

    Cantor 1887/8.

  16. 16.

    See Dauben 1979, 139, 336 n. 29.

  17. 17.

    See his letter of October 20 and 28, 1884 to Gösta Mittag-Leffler as published in Cantor 1991, 210 and 218 n. 3; Dauben 1979, 282, 337 n. 31.

  18. 18.

    See page 118 of his letter of March 3, 1883 to Gösta Mittag-Leffler as published in Cantor 1991, 118.

  19. 19.

    Op. cit., 244.

  20. 20.

    Cantor 1883, 181, 206 n. 6.

  21. 21.

    Op. cit., 204 n. 1.

  22. 22.

    See Cantor’s letter of September 21, 1895 to Giuseppe Peano as published in Cantor 1991, 365.

  23. 23.

    Cantor 1883, 207 n. 6, 7, 8; Cantor 1887/8, 418 n. 1.

  24. 24.

    Cantor 1887/8, 406, 420.

  25. 25.

    Op. cit., 418.

  26. 26.

    See Cantor’s letters of September 14 and 21, 1895 to Giuseppe Peano as published in Cantor 1991, 363, 365 respectively; Cantor 1887/8, 380, 411.

  27. 27.

    Cantor 1887/8, 379, 387, 411, 418 n. 1.

  28. 28.

    Cantor 1887/8, 379–380; Cantor 1883, 180–181; also see Cantor’s letters of November 13 and 17, 1890 to Giuseppe Veronese as published in Cantor 1991, 329, 330 respectively.

  29. 29.

    Cantor 1883, 191–192; Cantor 1887/8, 380–381 n. 1, 411; see Cantor’s letters of September 14 and 21, 1895 to Giuseppe Peano as published in Cantor 1991, 363, 365, respectively. Hereto cp. Hill 1999.

  30. 30.

    Cantor 1885, 440.

  31. 31.

    “On the Concept of Number: Psychological Analyses” as published in PdA 303–304; PoA 320–321.

  32. 32.

    Husserl 1906/07 §§11, 13b, 23.

  33. 33.

    Cantor 1887/8, 418 n. 1; PdA 116 n.; PoA 121 n. 3.

  34. 34.

    PdA 294, 337; PoA 310, 354–355.

  35. 35.

    PdA 86; PoA 89–90. Hereto cp. Hill 1999.

  36. 36.

    PdA 116 n. (see above); PoA 121 n. 3

  37. 37.

    Cantor 1887/8, 387; also see Cantor’s letter of February 15, 1884 to Kurd Lasswitz, as published in Cantor 1991, 178.

  38. 38.

    Ex. Cantor 1883, 168, 170, 201.

  39. 39.

    Cantor 1887/8, 418 n. 1.

  40. 40.

    Cantor 1883, 207 n. 6.

  41. 41.

    Husserl 1919, 344–345. Hereto cp. Hill 1998.

  42. 42.

    PdA 295, PoA 311.

  43. 43.

    Husserl 1913, 33.

  44. 44.

    Husserl 1913, 16–17; 34–35.

  45. 45.

    Husserl 1919, 344–345.

  46. 46.

    PRe 185.

  47. 47.

    Husserl 1919, 345.

  48. 48.

    Husserl 1913, 20.

  49. 49.

    Op. cit., 29.

  50. 50.

    Husserl 1905, 37.

  51. 51.

    Husserl 1913, 42.

  52. 52.

    Husserl 1903b, ‘Review of Melchior Palágyi’s Der Streit der Psychologisten und Formalisten in der Modernen Logik’, as translated in Husserl 1994, 201–302; Husserl 1913, 36–38, 46–49.

  53. 53.

    Husserl 1906, ‘Personal Notes’, as translated in Husserl 1994, 491–492.

  54. 54.

    Husserl 1913, 21–22.

  55. 55.

    See Hallett 1984, 16–18, 34–35, 121, 128–133, 146–158.

  56. 56.

    Cantor 1887/8, 416.

  57. 57.

    Op. cit., 418 n. 1.

  58. 58.

    Cantor 1883, 207 n. 6; Hallett 1984, 15.

  59. 59.

    Cantor 1883, 168, 170, 201.

  60. 60.

    Frege 1884, §86.

  61. 61.

    Husserl 1894, ‘Psychological Studies in the Elements of Logic’, as translated in Husserl 1994, 167.

  62. 62.

    Husserl 1913, 35, 222.

  63. 63.

    Husserl 1890b, ‘On the Logic of Signs (Semiotic)’ as translated in Husserl 1994, 50; Husserl 1894, ‘Psychological Studies in the Elements of Logic’ as translated in Husserl 1994, 167.

  64. 64.

    Husserl 1898/99, 232, 233, 252; Husserl 1906/07, §§ 20, 21.

  65. 65.

    Husserl 1902/03, 12–13.

  66. 66.

    Husserl 1906/07, §20.

  67. 67.

    Husserl 1898/99, 233.

  68. 68.

    Husserl 1906/07, §20; Husserl 1898/99, 233.

  69. 69.

    Husserl 1906/07, §21.

  70. 70.

    Husserl 1898/99, 225–255.

  71. 71.

    Husserl 1905, 39.

  72. 72.

    Husserl 1896, 5; Husserl, 1902/03b, 12–13; Hill 2008, 2009 and 2012.

  73. 73.

    See Cantor’s letter to Charles Hermite of January 24, 1894 as published in Cantor 1991, 350.

  74. 74.

    Cited in Hallett 1984, 10.

  75. 75.

    Loc. cit.

  76. 76.

    Dauben 1979, 125.

  77. 77.

    Cited in Hallett 1984, 149.

  78. 78.

    See Cantor’s letters of September 7, 1890 to Giuseppe Veronese, of November 3, 1886 to Axel Harnack, and of March 26, 1887 to Aloys Schmid as published in Cantor 1991, 326, 267, 282 respectively.

  79. 79.

    Cited in Hallett 1984, 36.

  80. 80.

    Cited in Dauben 1979, 298.

  81. 81.

    Dauben 1979, 290–291.

  82. 82.

    PRe 242.

  83. 83.

    See Dauben 1979, ch. 6, 236–239; Hallett 1984, 9–11, 35–36.

  84. 84.

    Cantor Briefbücher I (1884–1888), II (1890–1895), III (1895–1896); Hill 2008, 2009 and 2012.

  85. 85.

    Hill 1994.

  86. 86.

    Frege 1894, 196.

  87. 87.

    Op. cit., 197.

  88. 88.

    Op. cit., 197–198.

  89. 89.

    Op. cit., 204.

  90. 90.

    Op. cit., 205; Hill 1997c.

  91. 91.

    Frege 1894, 205.

  92. 92.

    Frege 1984, 180, 181.

  93. 93.

    Frege 1979, 69.

  94. 94.

    Op. cit., 70.

  95. 95.

    Op. cit., 71.

  96. 96.

    Frege 1894, 201–202.

  97. 97.

    Op. cit., 195.

  98. 98.

    Op. cit., 202.

  99. 99.

    Cantor 1885, 728–729.

  100. 100.

    Frege 1884, §96 note.

  101. 101.

    Frege 1984, 180–181; Dauben 1979, 220–228.

  102. 102.

    Frege 1894 (‘Review of Dr. E. Husserl’s Philosophy of Arithmetic’), 207; PdA 219; PoA 231.

  103. 103.

    Cantor 1883, 195. See Dauben 1979, 206.

  104. 104.

    Husserl 1929, §27a; also §24 and note.

  105. 105.

    PdA 14–15; PoA 15–16; also PdA 297; PoA 313–314.

  106. 106.

    PdA 11; PoA 12.

  107. 107.

    PdA 14–15; PoA 15–16; PdA 298; PoA 314–315.

  108. 108.

    Husserl 1913, 35.

  109. 109.

    Husserl 1903a, “A Report on German Writings in Logic from the Years 1895–1899, Third Article” as translated in Husserl 1994, 250; Husserl 1913, 28.

  110. 110.

    LI 41–43.

  111. 111.

    Husserl 1893, ‘A. Voigt’s “Elemental Logic,” in Relation to my Statements on the Logic of the Logical Calculus’, as translated in Husserl 1994, ex. 121.

  112. 112.

    Op. cit., 52–91, 421–441.

  113. 113.

    Ex. op. cit., 92–114, 115–120, 121–130, 135–138, 443–451.

  114. 114.

    Op. cit., 109, 123.

  115. 115.

    PdA 218–222; PoA 230–234.

  116. 116.

    Dauben 1979, 240–270.

  117. 117.

    Russell 1903, §§100, 344, 500; Russell 1959, 58–61. Hereto cp. Grattan-Guinness 1978, 1980, 2000.

  118. 118.

    Hilbert 1925, 375.

  119. 119.

    Frege 1980, 51.

  120. 120.

    Husserl 1902, ‘Memorandum of a Verbal Communication from Zermelo to Husserl’, as translated in Husserl 1994, 442. Cp. Rang & Thomas 1981.

  121. 121.

    Peckhaus & Kahle 2000/2001, 3–4. Also see Cantor 1991, “6. Die Phase des Gedankenaustausches mit Hilbert–Anerkennung der Mengenlehre und die Antinomien”, 387–485.

  122. 122.

    Dauben 1979, 241.

  123. 123.

    Op. cit., 165–168, 242.

  124. 124.

    Husserl 1906/07, 18d.

  125. 125.

    Husserl Ms. A 1 35.

  126. 126.

    Russell 1903, §489.

  127. 127.

    Hill 1997b.

  128. 128.

    Husserl 1929, §§ 23, 26.

  129. 129.

    Cantor 1883, 165–166.

  130. 130.

    Schuhmann 1977, 7.

  131. 131.

    Loc. cit.

  132. 132.

    Becker 1930, 40–42; Schuhmann 1977, 34.

  133. 133.

    PdA 294–95; PoA 310–11.

  134. 134.

    Husserl 1890a, “The Concept of General Arithmetic”, as translated in Husserl 1994, 2.

  135. 135.

    PdA 294; PoA 310.

  136. 136.

    PdA 12; PoA 13.

  137. 137.

    PdA 7; PoA 7.

  138. 138.

    Husserl 1891, “Letter from Edmund Husserl to Carl Stumpf”, as translated in Husserl 1994, 13.

  139. 139.

    LI 41–42; Husserl 1913, 35.

  140. 140.

    Husserl 1891, “Letter from Edmund Husserl to Carl Stumpf”, as translated in Husserl 1994, 13–16; Husserl 1913, 33; Husserl 1929, §31. Hereto cp. Hill 1991, 81–86.

  141. 141.

    PdA 221; PoA 233.

  142. 142.

    Grattan-Guinness 1971, 369.

  143. 143.

    Dauben, 158–59.

  144. 144.

    PRe §70.

  145. 145.

    Husserl 1906/07, §19; Husserl 1917/18, §§56–57; Husserl 1929, §31. Hereto cp. Centrone 2010.

  146. 146.

    Cantor 1883, 182.

  147. 147.

    Husserl 1906/07, §§18–19, 434–35; Husserl 1996, Chap. 11; Husserl 1929, §33.

  148. 148.

    PRe 242. Hereto cp. Hill 2000 and 2002b.

  149. 149.

    LI 43; Husserl 1913, 16–17.

  150. 150.

    Husserl 1890a, ‘The Concept of General Arithmetic’, as translated in Husserl 1994, 1.

  151. 151.

    PdA 294; PoA 310.

  152. 152.

    Frege 1984, 180; 181.

  153. 153.

    PRe 242.

  154. 154.

    LI 41–42; Husserl 1913, 35.

  155. 155.

    Husserl 1903b, Review of Melchior Palágyi’s Der Streit der Psychologisten und Formalisten in der Modernen Logik’, as translated in Husserl 1994, 201–202; Husserl 1913, 36–38, 46–49.

  156. 156.

    Cp. Hill 1998.

References

  • O. Becker, The Philosophy of Edmund Husserl (1930), in The Phenomenology of Husserl, Selected Critical Readings ed. by R. O. Elveton, (Quadrangle Books, Chicago, 1970), pp. 40–72

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Cantor, Grundlagen einer allgemeinen Mannigfaltigkeitslehre. Ein mathematisch-philosophischer Versuch in der Lehre des Unendlichen (1883) (Teubner, Leipzig. in Cantor, 1932), pp. 165–246

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Cantor, Rezension von Freges Grundlagen der Arithmetik, Deutsche Literaturzeitung VI (20) (1885), pp. 728–729

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Cantor, Mitteilungen zur Lehre vom Transfiniten, Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 91 (1887), 81–125; 92 (1888), 240–265. in Cantor 1932, pp. 378–439

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Cantor, in Gesammelte Abhandlungen, ed. by E. Zermelo (Springer, Berlin, 1932)

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Cantor, in Briefe, ed. by H. Meschkowski, W. Nilson (Springer, Berlin, 1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Cantor, Briefbücher I (1884–1888), II (1890–1895), III (1895–1896) at the Niedersächsische Staats-und Universitätsbibliothek Göttingen, Abteilung Handschriften und Seltene Drucke (Cod. Ms. 18)

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Centrone, Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics in the Early Husserl (Springer, Dordrecht, 2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • J. Dauben, Georg Cantor: His Mathematics and Philosophy of the Infinite (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1979)

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Frege, The Foundations of Arithmetic (1884) (Blackwell, Oxford, 1986)

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Frege, Review of Dr. E. Husserl’s Philosophy of Arithmetic (1894), in Frege 1984, pp. 195–209

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Frege, in Philosophical and Mathematical Correspondence, ed. by B. McGuinness, G. Gabriel, et al. (Blackwell, Oxford, 1980)

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Frege, in Posthumous Writings, ed. by H. Hermes, et al. (Blackwell, Oxford, 1979)

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Frege, in Collected Papers on Mathematics, Logic und Philosophy, ed. by B. McGuinness (Blackwell, Oxford, 1984)

    Google Scholar 

  • H. M. Gerlach, H. R. Sepp (eds.), Es ist keine Seligkeit 13 Jahre lang Privadocent und Tit. ‘prof’. zu sein. Husserls hallesche Jahre 1887 bis 1901, Husserl in Halle, (Peter Lang, Bern, 1994), pp. 15–39

    Google Scholar 

  • I. Grattan-Guinness, Towards a biography of Georg Cantor. Ann. Sci. 27(4), 345–391 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • I. Grattan-Guinness, How Russell discovered his paradox. Hist. Math. 5, 127–137 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • I. Grattan-Guinness, Georg Cantor’s influence on Bertrand Russell. Hist. Philos. Logic 1, 61–93 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • I. Grattan-Guinness, The Search for Mathematical Roots, Logics, Set Theories and the Foundations of Mathematics from Cantor through Gödel (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Hallett, Cantorian Set Theory and Limitation of Size (Clarendon, Oxford, 1984)

    Google Scholar 

  • C.O. Hill, Word and Object in Husserl, Frege and Russell (Ohio University Press, Athens, 1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • C.O. Hill, Frege attacks Husserl and Cantor. Monist 77(3), 347–357 (1994). Also in Hill & Rosado Haddock 2000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C.O. Hill, Did Georg Cantor influence Edmund Husserl? Synthese 113, 145–170 (1997a). Also in Hill & Rosado Haddock 2000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C.O. Hill, Rethinking Identity and Metaphysics. On the Foundations of Analytic Philosophy (Yale University Press, New Haven, 1997b)

    Google Scholar 

  • C.O. Hill, The varied sorrows of logical abstraction. Axiomathes 8(1–3), 53–82 (1997c). Also in Hill & Rosado Haddock 2000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C. O. Hill, From empirical psychology to phenomenology: Husserl on the Brentano puzzle in The Brentano Puzzle, ed. by R. Poli (Ashgate, Aldershot, 1998), pp. 151–168

    Google Scholar 

  • C. O. Hill, Abstraction and idealization in Georg Cantor and Edmund Husserl, in Abstraction and Idealization. Historical and Systematic Studies, Poznan studies in the philosophy of the sciences and the humanities, ed. by F. Coniglione et al. (Rodopi, Amsterdam, 1999). Also in Hill & Rosado Haddock 2000

    Google Scholar 

  • C. O. Hill, Husserl’s Mannigfaltigkeitslehre, in Hill & Rosado Haddock 2000, pp. 161–177

    Google Scholar 

  • C. O. Hill, On Husserl’s mathematical apprenticeship and philosophy of mathematics, in Phenomenology World Wide, ed. by Anna-Teresa Tymieniecka (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 2002a), pp. 76–92. Also in Hill & da Silva 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • C.O. Hill, Tackling three of Frege’s problems: Edmund Husserl on sets and manifolds. Axiomathes 13, 79–104 (2002b). Also in Hill & da Silva 2013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C. O. Hill, Phenomenology from the Metaphysical Standpoint, Diálogos XLIII, 91, January (2008), pp. 19–35

    Google Scholar 

  • C.O. Hill, Husserl and phenomenology, experience and essence, in Phenomenology and Existentialism, (Springer, Dordrecht, 2009), pp. 9–22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • C. O. Hill, Cantor’s paradise, metaphysics and Husserlian logic, in Categories of Being, Essays on Metaphysics and Logic ed. by H. Koskinen (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2012), pp. 217–240. Also in Hill & da Silva 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • C.O. Hill, G.E. Rosado Haddock, Husserl or Frege? Meaning, Objectivity, and Mathematics (Open Court, La Salle, 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • C.O. Hill, J.J. da Silva, The Road Not Taken, On Husserl’s Philosophy of Logic and Mathematics (College Publications, London, 2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Husserl, [1890a] Begriff der allgemeinen Arithmetik, in HGW XII, 375–379. English translation: The Concept of General Arithmetic, in HCW 1994, pp. 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Husserl, [1890b] Zur Logik der Zeichen, in HGW XII, 340–373. English translation: On the Logic of Signs (Semiotic), in HCW 1994, pp. 20–51

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Husserl, Philosophie der Arithmetik, in HGW XII, pp. 1–283

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Husserl, Philosophy of Arithmetic, in HCW X, pp. 1–299

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Husserl, [1891] Brief an Stumpf, in HGW XXI, 244–251. English translation: Letter from Edmund Husserl to Carl Stumpf, in HCW 1994, pp. 12–19

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Husserl, [1893] A. Voigts “Elementare Logik”, in HGW XXII, 73–82. English translation: A. Voigt’s “Elemental Logic”, in HCW 1994, pp. 121–130

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Husserl, [1894] Psychologische Studien zur elementaren Logik, in HGW XXII, 92–123. English translation: Psychological Studies in the Elements of Logic, in HCW 1994, pp. 139–170

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Husserl, [1896] Logik Vorlesung 1896, Husserliana, Materialienbände vol. I, ed. by E. Schuhmann (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Husserl, [1898/99] Aus der Einleitung der Vorlesung Erkenntnistheorie und Hauptpunkte der Metaphysik 1898/99, in Husserliana, Materialienbände Vol III, ed. by E. Schuhmann (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Husserl, [HGW] Husserliana, Gesammelte Werke, I–XXVI: Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, 1950–; XXVII–XXXVII: Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1989–; XXXVIII–: Springer, New York, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Husserl, vol. XII: [PdA] Philosophie der Arithmetik. Mit ergänzenden Texten (1890–1901), ed. by L. Eley, 1970a

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Husserl, [Pre] Prolegomena to Pure Logic, translated by J. N. Findlay (Routledge & Kegan Paul, New York 1970b) (translation of HGW XVIII)

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Husserl, [LI] Logical Investigations, translated by J. N. Findlay (Routledge & Kegan Paul, New York 1970c) (translation of HGW XVIII-XIX)

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Husserl, vol. XVII: Formale und transzendentale Logik. Versuch einer Kritik der logischen Vernunft, ed. by P. Jannsen, 1974

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Husserl, vol. XVIII: Logische Untersuchungen, Erster Band: Prolegomena zur reinen Logik, ed. by E. Holenstein, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Husserl, vol. XXII: Aufsätze und Rezensionen (1890–1910), ed. by B. Rang, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Husserl, [HCW] Husserliana, Edmund Husserl Collected Works, I–XIII–: Kluwer/Springer, Dordrecht, 1980–

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Husserl, vol. XXIV: Einleitung in die Logik und Erkenntnistheorie, Vorlesungen 1906/07, ed. by U. Melle, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Husserl, Skizze eines Lebensbildes von E. Husserl. Husserl Stud. 5, 105–125 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. Husserl, vol. V: [1994] Early Writings in the Philosophy of Logic and Mathematics, translated by D. Willard (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1994a)

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Husserl, [1902] Notiz einer mündlichen Mitteilung Zermelos an Husserl, in HGW XXII, 399. English translation: Memorandum of a Verbal Communication from Zermelo to Husserl, HCW 1994b, p. 442

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Husserl, vol. XXX: [1917/18] Logik und allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie, Vorlesungen 1917/18, mit ergänzenden Texten aus der ersten Fassung 1910/11, ed. by U. Panzer, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Husserl, [1902/03] in Logik Vorlesung 1902/03, Husserliana, Materialienbände vol. II, ed. by E. Schuhmann, (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Husserl, vol. X: [PoA] Philosophy of Arithmetic, Psychological and Logical Investigations with Supplementary Texts from 1887–1901, translated by D. Willard (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Husserl, vol. XIII: [1906/07] Introduction to Logic and Theory of Knowledge, Lectures 1906/1907, translated by C. O. Hill (Springer, Dordrecht, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Husserl, [1903a] Bericht über deutsche Schriften zur Logik in den Jahren 1895–99. Dritter Artikel, in HGW XXII, 201–15. English translation: A Report on German Writings in Logic from the Years 1895–1899, Third Article, in HCW 1994, pp. 246–259

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Husserl, [1903b] Rezension von Palaygi, in HGW XXII, 152–61. English translation: Review of Melchior Palágyi’s Der Streit der Psychologisten und Formalisten in der Modernen Logik, in HCW 1994, pp. 197–206

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Husserl, [1905] Husserl an Brentano, 27. III. 1905, in Briefwechsel, Die Brentanoschule I (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Husserl, [1906] Persönliche Aufzeichnungen, in HGW XXIV, 442–449. English translation: Personal Notes, in HCW 1994, pp. 490–500

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Husserl, [1913] in Introduction to the Logical Investigations, A Draft of a Preface to the Logical Investigations, ed. by E. Fink. Translated by P. Bossert and C. Peters (Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, 1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Husserl, [1919] Recollections of Franz Brentano, in Husserl: Shorter Works eds. by P. McCormick and F. Elliston (University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, 1981), pp. 342–349

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Husserl, [1929] Formal and Transcendental Logic, translated by D. Cairns (Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, 1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Husserl, [Ms A 1 35] Manuscript on set theory available in the Husserl Archives in Leuven, Cologne and Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Ierna, La notion husserlienne de multiplicité: au-delà de Cantor et Riemann, Methodos, Savoirs et Textes 12, n. 23 (2012), http://methodos.revues.org/2943?lang=en#bibliography

  • V. Peckhaus, R. Kahle, Hilbert’s Paradox, Report No. 38 (2000/2001), Institut Mittag-Leffler, The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, https://www.mittag-leffler.se/preprints/files/IML-0001-38.pdf

  • B. Rang, W. Thomas, Zermelo’s discovery of Russell’s paradox. Hist. Math. 8, 16–22 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B. Russell, Principles of Mathematics (Norton, New York, 1903)

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Russell, My Philosophical Development (1959) (Allen and Unwin, London 1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Schuhmann, Husserl-Chronik (M. Nijhoff, The Hague, 1977)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claire Ortiz Hill .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hill, C.O. (2017). Husserl and Cantor. In: Centrone, S. (eds) Essays on Husserl's Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics. Synthese Library, vol 384. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1132-4_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics