Skip to main content
Log in

How Can SMEs in a Cluster Respond to Global Demands for Corporate Responsibility?

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article argues why and how a participatory approach to implement corporate social responsibility (CSR) in a cluster would be beneficial for small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) who are members of the NCE – Subsea cluster in Bergen, Norway. The political and strategic reasons as well as internal motivation for SMEs to incorporate CSR into their business strategies are discussed with support from relevant literature. Furthermore, we offer a discussion on the characteristics of different approaches to incorporating CSR as part of business strategy and provide examples from the Norwegian context. As part of this discussion, we look into some of the clusters in Europe which have adopted a systematic approach to implement CSR as part of their agenda. We propose a means to undertake CSR as part of the cluster through a network model to address the limitations faced by the SMEs when they try to implement CSR individually. A network model (cluster approach) to CSR will motivate the uptake of CSR among SMEs when the network (cluster) is characterized by close geographical proximity and operates in the same sector. The uptake of CSR as part of the network (cluster) agenda can also lead to innovation through cooperation and competition. The particular challenges faced by the SMEs in implementing and sustaining CSR can be also minimized by being part of a network (cluster).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersen, E.: 2009, `What is Technology Strategy?', http://www.espen.com/weblog/, Accessed on 01 October 2009.

  • Andersen, J. C., Narus, J. A.: (1998) Business Market Management: Understanding, Creating and Delivering Value. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, L. B., Kriger, M. P.: 1986 The Hidden Side of Organisational Leadership. MIT Sloan Management Review 28: 15-26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Business in the Community (BITC): 2002, Engaging SMEs in Community and Social Issues, (Business in the Community, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Campi, S.: 2008, A Cluster Approach for the promotion of CSR among SMEs, (Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Pisa, Italy).

    Google Scholar 

  • Capgemini: 2008, Contemporary Strategy in a changing world, The capgemini consulting CEO study 2008, Mastering the triple bottom line. (Oslo: Cap Gemini).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson, M. B.: 1995, ‘A StakeholderFramework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance’, The Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92-117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities: 2001, ‘COM(2001) 366 final: GREEN PAPER Promoting a European framework for Corporate Social Responsibility’, Presented by the Commission of the European Communities, Brussels.

  • Commission of the European Communities: 2006, ‘COM(2006) 136 Final: Implementing the Partnership for Growth and Jobs: Making Europe a Pole of Excellence’, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortright, J.: March 2006, Making sense of Clusters: Regional Competitiveness and Economic Development, (The Brookings Institution: Metropolitan Policy Program, Washington DC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirk Matten, J. M.: 2008, ‘Implicit’ and ‘Explicit’ CSR: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding CSR in Europe’, Academy of Management Review, 33: 404-424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T., Dunfee, T. W.: 1994, Towards a Unified Conception of Business Ethics: Integrative Social Contracts Theory. Academy of Management Review 19:252-284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drezner, D. W.: 2007, All Politics is global: Explaining international regulatory regimes, (Princeton University Press, Princeton).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission: Enterprise and Industry, Small Medium Sized Enterprises: 2005, The New SME Definition: User Guide and Model Declaration (European Commission: Enterprise and Industry Publication, Brussels).

  • European Expert Group on CSR and SMEs: March 2007. Opportunity and Responsibility: How to Help Small Business Help Integrate Social and Environmental Issues in What They Do, European Commission (European Commission’s Directorate General for Enterprise and Industry, Brussels).

  • Fisher, K., Geenen, J., Jurcevic, M., McClintock, K., and Davis, G.: 2009, ‘Applying asset-based community development as a strategy for CSR: a Canadian perspective on a win–win for stakeholders and SMEs’, Business Ethics: A European Review 18(1), 66-82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M.: 1970, ‘A Friedman Doctrine: The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits’, The New York Times Magazine, September 13, 1970.

  • Goodpaster, K. E.: 2002, Chapter 6: Teaching and Learning Ethics by Case Method. In: E. Bowie (ed) The Blackwell Guide to Business Ethics. Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 117–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grayson, D., and Hodges, A.: 2004. Corporate Social Opportunity! 7 steps to make CSR work for your business, (GreenLeaf, Sheffield).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargett, T. R., and Williams, M. F.: 2009, ‘Wilh. Wilhelmsen Shipping Company: Moving from CSR tradition to CSR leadership’, Emerald Journal, 9(1), 73-82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, D., Rogovsky, N., and Dunfee, T.: 2008, ‘The next wave of corporate community involvement: Corporate social initiative’, in A. Crane, D. Matten, and L. J. Spence, Corporate Social Responsibility, Readings and Cases in a global context, (Routledge, Oxon) pp. 270-285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hockerts, K., Mitdun, A., Halme, M., Sweet, S., Davidson, P., and Nurmi, P.: 2007, CSR Driven Innovation: Towards the Social Purpose Business, (Danish Center for Corporate Responsibility, Copenhagen).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoivik, H. v. W: 2002, ‘Accessing, managing and sustaining moral values in organisations: A case study’, in H. v. W. Hoivik (ed), Moral leadership in action, (Edward Elgar Cheltenham, UK), pp.107-125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoivik, H. v.: 2004, ‘The Orissa Case’, in L. Bomann-Larsen, and O. Wiggen, Responsibility in World Business: Managing Harmful Side-Effects of Corporate Activity, (United Nations University Press, New York), pp.221-245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoivik, H. v., Mele, D. (2009) Can a SME Become a Global Corporate Citizen? Evidence from a Case Study. Journal of Business Ethics 88(3): 551-562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer, L. T.: 2008, The Ethics of Management, (McGraw-Hill, Singapore).

    Google Scholar 

  • Huemer, L.: 2009, Corporate Social Responsibility and Multinational Corporation Identity: Norwegian Strategies in Chilean Agricultural Industry. Working Paper, BI Norwegian School of Management, Oslo.

  • Hunt, S. D., and Morgan, R. M.: 1995, ‘The Comparative Advantage Theory of Competition’, Journal of Marketing, 15, 1-15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H. (2009) A Business Opportunity Model. Business Ethics: A European Review 18: 21-36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kriger, M.: 2005, ‘Chapter 16: What Really Is Strategic Process?’ in S. W. Floyd, J. Roos, C. D. Jacob, and F. W. Kellermanns, Innovating Strategy Process, (Blackwell, Malden, Massachusetts), pp.165-175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepoure, J., and Heene, A.: 2006, ‘Investigating the Impact of Firm Size on Small Business Social Responsibilty: A Critical Review’, Journal of Business Ethics, 67, 257-273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midttun, A.: 2009, Strategic CSR innovation: Serving Societal and Individual Needs, (BI Norwegian School of Management: Department of Innovation and Organizational management Oslo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Norway: 2008–2009, Report No10 (2008–2009)to Stortinget, Corporate Social Responsibility in a global economy, (Ministry of Foriegn Affairs, Oslo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morsing, M., and Perrini, F.: 2009, ‘CSR in SMEs: Do SMEs matter for the CSR Agenda’, Business Ethics: A European Review, 18(1), 1-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murillo, D., and Lozano, J. M.: 2009, ‘Pushing forward SME CSR through a network: An account from the Catalan Model’, Business Ethics: European Review, 18(1), 7-20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perera, O.: September 2008, How Material is ISO 26000 to Small Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs), (International Institute for Sustainable Development, Winnipeg, Canada).

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E.: 1980. Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors, (Free Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E.: 1990, The Competitive Advantage of Nations, (Free Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbloom, R. S. and R. A. Burgelman: 1989, Technology Strategy: An Evolutionary Process Perspective. Research in Technological Innovation, Management and Policy (JAI Press Inc.), pp. 1–23.

  • Sas, W., and Liedekerke, L. V.: 2009, Driving Forces Behind CSR in a SME Context: Internally Driven CSR. Working Paper (European Business Ethics Network, Athens).

  • Sehic, D., and Sabanovic, J.: 2008, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility of BandH Companies in Globalization’, in 5th International Scientific Conference Business and Management 2008 (Vilnius Gediminas Technical University Vilnius, Lithuania), pp. 598–605.

  • Spence, L. J.: 1999, Does Size Matter? The State of Art in Small Business Ethics. Business Ethics: A European Review 8(3): 163-174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, A. A., Strickland, A. J., and Gamble, J. E.: 2008, Crafting and Executing Strategy, The Quest for Competitive Advantage, 17th edition, (McGraw-Hill, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall, C.: 2008, Buried Treasure: Discovering and Implementing the value of Corporate social Responsibilty, (GreenLeaf, Sheffield, UK).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wit, B. D., and Meyer, R.: 2004, ‘Chapter 4, Strategic Change’, in.B. D. Wit, and R. Meyer, Strategy: Process, Content, Context, An International Perspective, 3rd edition, (Thomson Learning, London), pp. 163-226.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heidi von Weltzien Høivik.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

von Weltzien Høivik, H., Shankar, D. How Can SMEs in a Cluster Respond to Global Demands for Corporate Responsibility?. J Bus Ethics 101, 175–195 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0708-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0708-6

Keywords

Navigation