Abstract
Based on the empirical data, I describe some changes and stabilities in the views of students in secondary schools in Germany on the origins of the world and of humans. In these views, religious as well as scientific perspectives interact: the belief in God as creator on the one hand and the trust in the theories of big bang and evolution on the other. The longitudinal study presents different ways in which two students, Nico and Lena, combine these two perspectives and examines how their combinations changed across the ages of 12, 14, and 16. The comparison of these two cases brings up the problem of explaining the shown differences which will have to be researched further.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
In the Federal Republic of Germany, each of the 16 states decides on its own educational system. This has led to a very complex overall situation. In 14 federal states, pupils attend primary schools for 4 years (in Berlin and Brandenburg for 6 years). Then the students have to choose between three (or two) different types of secondary schools: They attend secondary modern schools in order to graduate after the 9th form. Otherwise, they go to junior high schools and graduate after the 10th form. (In some states, secondary modern and junior high schools have merged.) Or they attend grammar schools/high schools until graduating after the 12th or 13th form. In several federal states, students also attend comprehensive schools.
Religious Education (RE) normally takes place in every state school and form in conformity with the German Constitution (article 7,3). About 60% of German students belong to a Christian church, in Eastern Germany; however, undenominational students often are in the majority. In most states in Germany, the religious communities work together with the state which has to organize RE. This results in schools in diverse offers of confessional RE, e.g. of the Protestant, Roman Catholic and meanwhile in some places of the Islamic type (about 5% of the students are Muslim). Most students have to attend RE in their own religion and confession with a teacher of the same confession or choose the subjects ethics or philosophy as a neutral alternative. In some regions, Roman Catholic and Protestant RE cooperate (from time to time). In three federal states (Berlin, Brandenburg, Bremen), RE is substituted by a neutral subject. An interreligious RE for all the students is offered by Protestant teachers in Hamburg.
- 2.
References
Altmeyer, S., Englert, R., Kohler-Spiegel, H., Naurath, E., Schroeder, B., & Schweitzer, F. (Eds.). (2018). Schoepfung. Goettingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht (Jahrbuch der Religionspaedagogik, 34).
Barbour, I. G. (1997). Religion and science. San Francisco: HarperOne.
Barnes, M., Elser, J., & Brownell, S. (2017). Impact of a short evolution module on students’ perceived conflict between religion and evolution. The American Biology Teacher, 79(2), 104–111.
Basel, N., Harms, U., Prechtl, H., Weiss, T., & Rothgangel, M. (2014). Students’ arguments on the science and religion issue: The example of evolutionary theory and genesis. Journal of Biological Education, 48(4), 179–187.
Behe, M. J. (1996). Darwin’s black box: The biochemical challenge to evolution. New York/London/Toronto/Sydney: Free Press.
Benk, A., & Erb, R. (2008). Religionsdidaktik und Physikdidaktik. Theo-Web, 7(1), 321–343.
Billingsley, B., Taber, K., Riga, F., & Newdick, H. (2013). Secondary school students’ epistemic insight into the relationships between science and religion – A preliminary enquiry. Research in Science Education, 43(4), 1715–1732.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research. Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. London: Sage Publishing.
Dawkins, R. (2006). The god delusion. London: Bantam Books.
Dieterich, V.-J., & Imkampe, M. (2013). “Es koennte doch sein, dass Gott der Natur geholfen hat, sich zu entwickeln” – Komplementaeres oder/und hybrides Denken? In V.-J. Dieterich, B. Roebben, & M. Rothgangel (Eds.), Der Urknall ist immerhin, wuerde ich sagen, auch nur eine Theorie (pp. 132–143). Stuttgart: Calwer.
Doering, N., & Bortz, J. (2016). Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation in den Sozial- und Humanwissenschaften. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
EARSandEYES. (2009). Umfrage zur Entstehung des Menschen. http://de.statista.com/statsistik/daten/studie/5983/umfrage/beste-erklaerung-fuer-dieentstehung-des-heutigen-menschen/. Accessed 22 Mar 2017.
Eikermann, S.-L. (2012). Weltbilder von Grundschulkindern heute. Berlin/Muenster: Lit.
Englert, R. (1985). Glaubensgeschichte und Bildungsprozess. Muenchen: Koesel.
Evans, E. M. (2001). Cognitive and contextual factors in the emergence of diverse belief systems: Creation versus evolution. Cognitive Psychology, 42, 217–266.
Feige, A., & Gennerich, C. (2008). Lebensorientierungen Jugendlicher. Muenster: Waxmann.
Fetz, R. L., Reich, K. H., & Valentin, P. (2001). Weltbildentwicklung und Schoepfungsverstaendnis. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
Flick, U., Kardorff, E. V., & Steinke, I. (Eds.). (2017). Qualitative Forschung. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt.
Francis, L., & Greer, J. (2001). Shaping adolescents’ attitudes towards science and religion in Northern Ireland: The role of scientism, creationism and denominational schools. Research in Science & Technological Education, 19(1), 39–53.
Fulljames, P., & Francis, L. (1988). The influence of creationism and scientism on attitudes towards christianity among Kenyan secondary school students. Educational Studies, 14(1), 77–96.
Gensicke, T. (2006). Jugend und Religiositaet. In Shell Deutschland Holding (Ed.), Jugend 2006 (pp. 203–239). Frankfurt a.M.: Fischer.
Hammann, M., & Asshoff, R. (2015). Schuelervorstellungen im Biologieunterricht. Seelze: Klett & Kallmeyer.
Hawking, S. (1998). A brief history of time. New York: Bantam.
Hawking, S., & Mlodinow, L. (2010). The grand design. New York: Bantam.
Hoeger, C. (2008). Abschied vom Schoepfergott? Berlin: Lit.
Hoeger, C. (2011). Kein Pauschalabschied vom Schoepfergott: Welterklaerungen von Abiturientinnen und Abiturienten. In H.-G. Ziebertz (Ed.), Praktische Theologie – empirisch (pp. 99–126). Berlin: Lit.
Hoeger, C. (2012). Analyse von sieben Kinderbildern zur Weltentstehung bzw. Welterschaffung. In I. R. P. der Erzdioezese Freiburg (Ed.), Umgang mit Bildern im Religionsunterricht (pp. 39–58). IRP der Erzdioezese Freiburg: Freiburg.
Hoeger, C. (2013a). Schoepfungstheologie der Jugendlichen und deren Konsequenzen fuer den Religionsunterricht. In V.-J. Dieterich, B. Roebben, & M. Rothgangel (Eds.), Der Urknall ist immerhin, wuerde ich sagen, auch nur eine Theorie (pp. 91–104). Stuttgart: Calwer.
Hoeger, C. (2013b). “Kaeseglocke” oder “blauer Planet”? In H.J. Riedl & R. Wunderlich (Eds.), “Erwerbt euch Weisheit, …” (Sir 51,25) (pp. 335–372). Frankfurt a. M.: Lang.
Hoeger, C. (2014). Was Kinder und Jugendliche vom Kosmos wissen und wie es sich wandeln kann. In V.-J. Dieterich & G. Buettner (Eds.), Weisst du wieviel Sternlein stehen? (pp. 121–136). Kassel: Kassel University Press.
Hoeger, C. (2015a). Lehrkraft, gib uns passende Inhalte zur rechten Zeit! In S. Pemsel-Maier & M. Schambeck (Eds.), Keine Angst vor Inhalten! (pp. 171–190). Freiburg: Herder.
Hoeger, C. (2015b). Einstellungen zum Ursprung von Welt und Mensch. In T. Faix & U. Riegel & T. Kuenkler (Eds.), Theologien von Jugendlichen (pp. 207–224). Berlin: Lit.
Hoeger, C. (2016). Schuelerwissen und -einstellungen zu Schoepfung, Urknall und Evolution in der Entwicklung. In C. Hoeger & S. Arzt (Eds.), Empirische Religionspaedagogik und Praktische Theologie (pp. 250–270). Freiburg: Salzburg. http://phfr.bszbw.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/566. Accessed 22 Mar 2017.
Hoeger, C. (2018). Schachmatt für die Schoepfung? Empirische Befunde und religionspaedagogische Herausforderungen. In S. Altmeyer, R. Englert, H. Kohler-Spiegel, E. Naurath, B. Schroeder, & F. Schweitzer (Eds.), Schoepfung (pp. 30–44). Goettingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht (Jahrbuch der Religionspaedagogik, 34).
IfD Allensbach. (2009). Glauben an Schoepfungsgeschichte oder Evolution des Menschen. http://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/5171/umfrage/glauben-an-schoepfungsgeschichteoder-evolution/. Accessed 22 Mar 2017.
Johannsen, M., & Krueger, D. (2005). Schuelervorstellungen zur Evolution – eine quantitative Studie. Berichte des Instituts fuer Didaktik der Biologie, 14, 23–48.
Junker, R. (2010). Spuren Gottes in der Schoepfung? Holzgerlingen: SCM Haenssler.
Junker, R., & Scherer, S. (2013). Evolution – ein kritisches Lehrbuch. Giessen: Weyel.
Kattmann, U. (2013). Glaube an die Evolution? In H. P. Weber & R. Langthaler (Eds.), Evolutionstheorie und Schoepfungsglaube (pp. 201–227). Goettingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht unipress.
Kelle, U., & Kluge, S. (2010). Vom Einzelfall zum Typus. Wiesbaden: VS Verl. fuer Sozialwissenschaften.
Klose, B. (2009). Kreationismus und Wissenschaftsglaeubigkeit – empirisch erfasst!? Theo-Web, 8(1), 75–79.
Klose, B. (2011). Kreationismus, Wissenschaftsglaeubigkeit und Werthaltung Jugendlicher. In H. Bayrhuber, A. Faber, & R. Leinfelder (Eds.), Darwin und kein Ende? (pp. 145–151). Seelze: Kallmeyer.
Konnemann, C., Oberleitner, E., Asshoff, R., Hammann, M., & Rothgangel, M. (2013). Einstellungen Jugendlicher zu Schoepfung und Evolution. In V.-J. Dieterich, B. Roebben, & M. Rothgangel (Eds.), Der Urknall ist immerhin, wuerde ich sagen, auch nur eine Theorie (pp. 49–62). Stuttgart: Calwer.
Konnemann, C., Asshoff, R., & Hammann, M. (2016). Insights into the diversity of attitudes concerning evolution and creation: A multidimensional approach. Science Education, 100(4), 673–705.
Konnemann, C., Hoeger, C., Asshoff, R., Hammann, M., & Riess, W. (2018). A role for epistemic insight in attitude and belief change? Lessons from a cross-curricular course on evolution and creation. Research Science Education, 48(6), 1187–1204.
Kutschera, U. (2008). Creationism in Germany and its possible cause. Evolution: Education & Outreach, 1, 84–86.
Lueke, U. (2016). Ergaenzung oder Widerspruch? Urknall, Evolution und Schoepfung. Welt und Umwelt der Bibel, 21(80), 10–17.
Piaget, J. (1971). The Child’s conception of the world. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul LTD. https://ia800501.us.archive.org/30/items/childsconception01piag/childsconception01piag.pdf. Accessed 22 Mar 2017.
Rauch, T., & Hoeger, C. (2016). Naturdeutungen von GrundschuelerInnen. In C. Hoeger & S. Arzt (Eds.), Empirische Religionspaedagogik und Praktische Theologie (pp. 250–270). Salzburg: Freiburg. http://phfr.bsz-bw.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/566. Accessed 22 Mar 2017.
Reich, K. H. (2002). Developing the horizons of the mind. Relational and contextual reasoning and the resolution of cognitive conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Reich, K. H. (2003). Developing the horizons of the mind. Reich’s response to the commentators. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science, 38(2), 459–466.
Reich, K. H. (2004). The role of cognition in religious development. http://dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/1874/1164/19/index.htm. Accessed 22 Mar 2017.
Reich, K. H., Oser, F., & Valentin, P. (1994). Knowing why i now know better: Children’s and Youth’s explanations of their worldview changes. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 4(1), 151–173.
Reiss, M. (2008). Should science educators deal with the science/religion issue? Studies in Science Education, 44(2), 157–186.
Retzlaff-Fuerst, C., & Urhahne, D. (2009). Evolutionstheorie, Religiositaet und Kreationismus und wie Schueler darueber denken. Der mathematische und naturwissenschaftliche Unterricht, 62(3), 173–183.
Robbins, J., & Roy, P. (2007). The natural selection. The American Biology Teacher, 69(8), 460–466.
Rothgangel, M. (1999). Naturwissenschaft und Theologie. Goettingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Rothgangel, M. (2011). Kreationismus und Szientismus: Didaktische Herausforderungen. In H. Bayrhuber, A. Faber, & R. Leinfelder (Eds.), Darwin und kein Ende? (pp. 154–169). Seelze: Kallmeyer.
Schick, H. (2012). Entwicklungspsychologie der Kindheit und Jugend. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
Schoenborn, C. (2005, July 7). Finding design in nature. New York Times.
Schreiner, M. (2012). Das Verhaeltnis des Religionsunterrichts zu anderen Faechern. In M. Rothgangel, G. Adam, & R. Lachmann (Eds.), Religionspaedagogisches Kompendium (pp. 191–206). Goettingen/Bristol: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Schweitzer, F. (1999). Kinder und Jugendliche als Exegeten? In D. Bell, H. Lipski-Melchior, J. von Luepke, & B. Ventur (Eds.), Menschen suchen – Zugaenge finden (pp. 238–244). Wuppertal: Foedus.
Schweitzer, F., Hardecker, G., Maaß, C. H., Ilg, W., & Lißmann, K. (2016). Jugendliche nach der Konfirmation: Glaube, Kirche und eigenes Engagement – eine Laengsschnittstudie. Guetersloh: Guetersloher Verlagshaus.
Shane, J., Binns, I., Meadows, L., Hermann, R., & Benus, M. (2016). Beyond evolution: Addressing broad interactions between science and religion in science teacher education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 27(2), 165–181.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1996). Grounded theory: Grundlagen qualitativer Sozialforschung. Weinheim: Psychologie-Verl.-Union.
Valsiner, J. (2000). Culture and human development. London: Sage.
Weiss, T. (2016). Fachspezifische und fachuebergreifende Argumentation am Beispiel von Schoepfung und Evolution. Goettingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht unipress.
Worsley, H. J. (2013). Seven years on: Insights from children’s developing perspectives in interpreting the wisdom of the biblical creation narrative. British Journal of Religious Education, 35(1), 55–71.
Ziebertz, H.-G., & Riegel, U. (2008). Letzte Sicherheiten. Guetersloh, Freiburg: Guetersloher Verl.-Haus & Herder.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hoeger, C. (2019). Changes and Stabilities in the Views of German Secondary School Students on the Origin of the World and of Humans from the Ages of 12 to 14 and 16: First Results of a Qualitative Empirical Longitudinal Study. In: Billingsley, B., Chappell, K., Reiss, M.J. (eds) Science and Religion in Education. Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education, vol 48. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17234-3_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17234-3_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-17233-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-17234-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)