Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Thinking “difference” differently: Cassirer versus Derrida on symbolic mediation

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cassirer’s approach to symbolic mediation differs in some important ways from currently prevailing approaches to meaning and signification such as semiology and its more recent poststructuralist varieties. Cassirer’s philosophy of symbolic forms offers a theory of symbols that does not amount to a sign theory or semiology. It sketches out, rather, a dynamic and nonrepresentational framework in which an alternative notion of difference takes centre stage. In order to make the original features of Cassirer’s approach stand out, I will compare it with the approach of the perhaps most influential differential thinker of our day, Jacques Derrida. The philosophy of symbolic forms explicitly prefigures a great many of the insights and concerns of poststructuralism. Yet, there are some critical differences. Rather than rejecting the concepts of objectivity, identity, and truth on the premises established by traditional metaphysics, Cassirer chooses to redefine these concepts through a radical conceptual reframing. The result is a doctrine that—in Derridean parlance—neither jumps beyond the oppositions of metaphysics, nor tries to resolve them in a Hegelian synthesis—a doctrine, that is, that even though it appeals to origins, cannot so easily be dismissed as yet another instantiation of the metaphysics of presence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bennington G. (1993) Jacques Derrida. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassirer E. (1944) An essay of man: An introduction to a philosophy of human culture. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassirer, E. (1949). ‘Life’ and ‘Spirit’ in contemporary philosophy, In: P. A. Schilpp (Ed.), The Philosophy of Ernst Cassirer, Vol. 6 of Library of Living Philosophers, Open Court, LaSalle, Ill., (pp. 855–880). Translated by Robert Walter Bretall and Paul Arthur Schilpp. Originally published in German 1930.

  • Cassirer, E. (1955). The philosophy of symbolic forms, Vol. 1: Language (R. Manheim, Trans.). New Haven: Yale University Press. (Originally published in German 1923).

  • Cassirer, E. (1956). Der Begriff der symbolischen Form im Aufbau der Geisteswissenschaften, Wesen und Wirkung des Symbolbegriffs (pp. 169–200). Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. (Originally published 1923).

  • Cassirer, E. (1957). The philosophy of symbolic forms, Vol. 3: The phenomenology of knowledge (R. Manheim, Trans.). New Haven: Yale University Press. (Originally published in German 1929).

  • Cassirer, E. (1985). Form und Technik. In: E. W. Orth & J. M. Krois (Eds.), Symbol, Technik, Sprache: Aufsätze aus den Jahren 1927–1933 (pp. 39–91). Hamburg: Felix Meiner. (Originally published 1930).

  • Cassirer, E. (1996). The philosophy of symbolic forms. Vol. 4: The metaphysics of symbolic forms. New Haven: Yale University Press. (Originally published in German 1995).

  • Cassirer E. (2004). Das Symbolproblem und seine Stellung im System der Philosophie. In: B. Recki (Ed.), Aufsätze und Kleine Schriften (1927–1931), Vol. 17 of Gesammelte Werke, Hamburger Ausgabe (pp. 253–282). Hamburg: Felix Meiner. (Originally published 1927).

  • Caws P. (1988) Structuralism: The art of the intelligible. Humanities Press, Atlantic Highlands, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1978). Writing and difference (A. Bass, Trans). London: Routledge. (Originally published in French 1967).

  • Derrida, J. (1982). Différance, Margins of philosophy (A. Bass, Trans. pp. 1–27). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Originally published in French 1968).

  • Derrida, J. (1997). Of grammatology (G. C. Spivak, Trans.). Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press. (Originally published in French 1967).

  • Derrida, J. (2004). Positions (A. Bass, Trans.). London: Continuum. (Originally published in French 1972).

  • Dillon M.C. (1995) Semiological reductionism: A critique of the deconstructionist movement in postmodern thought. State University of New York, Albany, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1929). Critique of Pure Reason (N. K. Smith, Trans.). Hong Kong: Macmillan. (Originally published in German 1781).

  • Kant, I. (1987). Critique of judgment (W. S. Pluhar, Trans.). Indianapolis: Hackett. (Originally published in German 1790).

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans.). London: Routledge. (Originally published in French 1945).

  • Rorty R. (1980) Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Saussure, F. d. (1959). Course in general linguistics (W. Baskin, Trans.). New York: McGraw-Hill. (Originally published in French 1916).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway

    Aud Sissel Hoel

Authors
  1. Aud Sissel Hoel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aud Sissel Hoel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hoel, A.S. Thinking “difference” differently: Cassirer versus Derrida on symbolic mediation. Synthese 179, 75–91 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9629-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9629-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation