Skip to main content
Log in

Constrained Monotonicity and the Measurement of Power

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we will discuss constraints on the number of (non-dummy) players and on the distribution of votes such that local monotonicity is satisfied for the Public Good Index. These results are compared to properties which are related to constraints on the redistribution of votes (such as implied by global monotonicity). The discussion shows that monotonicity is not a straightforward criterion of classification for power measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Banzhaf, J.F. III (1965),Weighted Voting Doesn't Work: A Mathematical Analysis, Rutgers Law Review 19: 317-343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, B. (1980), Is it Better to Be Powerful or Lucky: Part I and Part II, Political Studies 28: 183-194 and 338-352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brams, S.J. and Fishburn, P.C. (1995), When is Size a Liability? Bargaining Power in Minimal Winning Coalitions, Journal of Theoretical Politics 7: 301-316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplow, T. (1968), Two Against One: Coalitions in Triads, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deegan, J. Jr. and Packel, E.W. (1978), A New Index of Power for Simple n-Person Games, International Journal of Game Theory 7: 113-123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felsenthal, D. and Machover, M. (1998), The Measurement of Voting Power.Theory and Practice, Problems and Paradoxes, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenthal, D., Machover, M. and Zwicker, W. (1998), The Bicameral Postulates and Indices of a Priori Voting Power, Theory and Decision 44: 83-116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, D. and Schotter, A. (1978), The Inevitability of the Paradox of Redistribution in the Allocation of Voting Weights, Public Choice 33: 49-67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.C. and Brams, S.J. (1996), MinimalWinning Coalitions in Weighted-Majority Voting Games, Social Choice and Welfare 13: 397-417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freixas, J. and Gambarelli, G. (1997), Common Internal Properties Among Power Indices, Control and Cybernetics 26: 591-603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holler, M.J. (1982), Forming Coalitions and Measuring Voting Power, Political Studies 30: 262-271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holler, M.J. (1998), Two Stories, One Power Index, Journal of Theoretical Politics 10: 179-190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holler, M.J. and Packel, E.W. (1983), Power, Luck and the Right Index, Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie (Journal of Economics) 43: 21-29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinskì, R. and Silársky, P. (2000), Global Monotonicity of Values of Cooperative Games, in M.J. Holler and G. Owen (eds.), Power Indices and Coalition Formation (forthcoming).

  • Machover, M. (2000), Notions of A Priori Voting Power: Critique of Holler and Widgrén, Homo Oeconomicus 16: 415-425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Napel, S. (1999), The Holler-Packel Axiomatization of the Public Good Index Completed, Homo Oeconomicus 15: 513-520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Packel, E.W. and Deegan, J. Jr. (1982), An Axiomated Familiy of Power Indices for Simple n-Person Games, in M.J. Holler (ed.), Power, Voting, and Voting Power, Würzburg and Vienna: Physica-Verlag, 213-221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapley, L.S. and Shubik, M. (1954), A Method of Evaluating the distribution of Power in a Committee System, American Political Science Review 48: 787-792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turnovec, F. (1997), Power, Power Indices and Intuition, Control and Cybernetics 26: 613-615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnovec, F. (1998), Monotonicity and power indices, in: T.J. Stewart and R.C. van den Honert (eds.), Trends in Multicriteria Decision Making, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems 465, Berlin et al.: Springer-Verlag, 199-214.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Holler, M.J., Ono, R. & Steffen, F. Constrained Monotonicity and the Measurement of Power. Theory and Decision 50, 383–395 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010335410952

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010335410952

Navigation